Shunhua Ou , Yonghua Yu , Nao Hu , Lei Hu , Jianguo Yang
{"title":"船用中速柴油机汽缸间燃烧均匀性控制策略研究","authors":"Shunhua Ou , Yonghua Yu , Nao Hu , Lei Hu , Jianguo Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Closed-loop combustion control (CLCC) is an efficient method for minimizing cylinder-to-cylinder combustion variation by adjusting individual cylinder fuel injection parameters. It is complementary to the closed-loop speed control, which precisely controls the engine speed by manipulating the global fuel injection parameters. However, the application of CLCC changed the conventional closed-loop speed control to a complex control structure. In addition, the selection of combustion control parameters will not only influence the combustion heat release control precisely, but also lead to increased calibration effort for the combustion controller. In this research, a triple closed-loop control strategy, in conjunction with a set-point online generation method, was proposed to improve the cylinder-to-cylinder combustion homogeneity, maintain the desired engine speed, and reduce the calibration effort simultaneously. A coefficient of variation in crank angle domain was utilized to analyze the cylinder-to-cylinder combustion homogeneity. The triple closed-loop control strategy was implemented on a marine medium-speed diesel engine. The experimental results indicated that the proposed control strategy, compared with the speed & IMEP (indicated mean effective pressure) cooperative control and speed & MFB50 (crank angle when 50 % fuel is consumed) cooperative control, has a better potential to alleviate cylinder-to-cylinder pressure variations at the same crankshaft angle. The cylinder-to-cylinder variation of IMEP and MFB50 decreased by 61 % and 38 % compared to the closed-loop speed control, respectively. The cylinder-to-cylinder combustion inhomogeneity, resulting from engine long-time operation and ambient conditions change, was significantly reduced as well. Therefore, the proposed strategy provides a multi-objective precise control method that allows the extension to low-carbon and zero-carbon marine engines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 106156"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of control strategy for cylinder-to-cylinder combustion homogeneity of marine medium-speed diesel engines\",\"authors\":\"Shunhua Ou , Yonghua Yu , Nao Hu , Lei Hu , Jianguo Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Closed-loop combustion control (CLCC) is an efficient method for minimizing cylinder-to-cylinder combustion variation by adjusting individual cylinder fuel injection parameters. It is complementary to the closed-loop speed control, which precisely controls the engine speed by manipulating the global fuel injection parameters. However, the application of CLCC changed the conventional closed-loop speed control to a complex control structure. In addition, the selection of combustion control parameters will not only influence the combustion heat release control precisely, but also lead to increased calibration effort for the combustion controller. In this research, a triple closed-loop control strategy, in conjunction with a set-point online generation method, was proposed to improve the cylinder-to-cylinder combustion homogeneity, maintain the desired engine speed, and reduce the calibration effort simultaneously. A coefficient of variation in crank angle domain was utilized to analyze the cylinder-to-cylinder combustion homogeneity. The triple closed-loop control strategy was implemented on a marine medium-speed diesel engine. The experimental results indicated that the proposed control strategy, compared with the speed & IMEP (indicated mean effective pressure) cooperative control and speed & MFB50 (crank angle when 50 % fuel is consumed) cooperative control, has a better potential to alleviate cylinder-to-cylinder pressure variations at the same crankshaft angle. The cylinder-to-cylinder variation of IMEP and MFB50 decreased by 61 % and 38 % compared to the closed-loop speed control, respectively. The cylinder-to-cylinder combustion inhomogeneity, resulting from engine long-time operation and ambient conditions change, was significantly reduced as well. Therefore, the proposed strategy provides a multi-objective precise control method that allows the extension to low-carbon and zero-carbon marine engines.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Control Engineering Practice\",\"volume\":\"154 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Control Engineering Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066124003150\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066124003150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Study of control strategy for cylinder-to-cylinder combustion homogeneity of marine medium-speed diesel engines
Closed-loop combustion control (CLCC) is an efficient method for minimizing cylinder-to-cylinder combustion variation by adjusting individual cylinder fuel injection parameters. It is complementary to the closed-loop speed control, which precisely controls the engine speed by manipulating the global fuel injection parameters. However, the application of CLCC changed the conventional closed-loop speed control to a complex control structure. In addition, the selection of combustion control parameters will not only influence the combustion heat release control precisely, but also lead to increased calibration effort for the combustion controller. In this research, a triple closed-loop control strategy, in conjunction with a set-point online generation method, was proposed to improve the cylinder-to-cylinder combustion homogeneity, maintain the desired engine speed, and reduce the calibration effort simultaneously. A coefficient of variation in crank angle domain was utilized to analyze the cylinder-to-cylinder combustion homogeneity. The triple closed-loop control strategy was implemented on a marine medium-speed diesel engine. The experimental results indicated that the proposed control strategy, compared with the speed & IMEP (indicated mean effective pressure) cooperative control and speed & MFB50 (crank angle when 50 % fuel is consumed) cooperative control, has a better potential to alleviate cylinder-to-cylinder pressure variations at the same crankshaft angle. The cylinder-to-cylinder variation of IMEP and MFB50 decreased by 61 % and 38 % compared to the closed-loop speed control, respectively. The cylinder-to-cylinder combustion inhomogeneity, resulting from engine long-time operation and ambient conditions change, was significantly reduced as well. Therefore, the proposed strategy provides a multi-objective precise control method that allows the extension to low-carbon and zero-carbon marine engines.
期刊介绍:
Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper.
The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC.
Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.