利用机器学习对每小时室内空气温度进行长期预测

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Energy and Buildings Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114972
Anssi Laukkarinen, Juha Vinha
{"title":"利用机器学习对每小时室内空气温度进行长期预测","authors":"Anssi Laukkarinen,&nbsp;Juha Vinha","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Indoor air temperature is one of the key variables for indoor air quality, building energy consumption and moisture safety. Measurements are required to have accurate information on how well indoor air temperature during operation matches the target values set in the design phase. However, besides the information acquired during the measurements, we would also like to have a more comprehensive understanding on how the temperature conditions behave outside the measurement campaign, in different years and in future climatic conditions. The purpose of this paper is to compare machine learning (ML) methods for long-term prediction of hourly indoor air temperature, where the predictions are made based on outdoor climatic conditions only. According to results, the prediction accuracy (mean absolute error) was between 0.78 °C and 1.71 °C for the baseline method (arithmetic mean of training data) and between 0.5 °C and 0.8 °C for the best methods. Prediction methods should be evaluated using multiple datasets and with sufficiently long measurement periods. The most influential factor for prediction accuracy was the selection of the prediction method, whereas optimisation method, number of cross-validation splits and number of lagged values of the climatic variables were of secondary importance. The best combination of prediction accuracy, calculation time and robustness towards variation in measured data was found with decision-tree based methods, such as RandomForest, XGBoost, LightGBM and ExtraTreesRegressor. In the future common datasets and a benchmarking system should be defined for a better comparison of different ML methods for indoor air temperature prediction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term prediction of hourly indoor air temperature using machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Anssi Laukkarinen,&nbsp;Juha Vinha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Indoor air temperature is one of the key variables for indoor air quality, building energy consumption and moisture safety. Measurements are required to have accurate information on how well indoor air temperature during operation matches the target values set in the design phase. However, besides the information acquired during the measurements, we would also like to have a more comprehensive understanding on how the temperature conditions behave outside the measurement campaign, in different years and in future climatic conditions. The purpose of this paper is to compare machine learning (ML) methods for long-term prediction of hourly indoor air temperature, where the predictions are made based on outdoor climatic conditions only. According to results, the prediction accuracy (mean absolute error) was between 0.78 °C and 1.71 °C for the baseline method (arithmetic mean of training data) and between 0.5 °C and 0.8 °C for the best methods. Prediction methods should be evaluated using multiple datasets and with sufficiently long measurement periods. The most influential factor for prediction accuracy was the selection of the prediction method, whereas optimisation method, number of cross-validation splits and number of lagged values of the climatic variables were of secondary importance. The best combination of prediction accuracy, calculation time and robustness towards variation in measured data was found with decision-tree based methods, such as RandomForest, XGBoost, LightGBM and ExtraTreesRegressor. In the future common datasets and a benchmarking system should be defined for a better comparison of different ML methods for indoor air temperature prediction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778824010880\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778824010880","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

室内空气温度是影响室内空气质量、建筑能耗和防潮安全的关键变量之一。要准确了解室内空气温度在运行过程中与设计阶段设定的目标值的匹配程度,就必须进行测量。然而,除了测量期间获得的信息,我们还希望更全面地了解测量活动之外、不同年份和未来气候条件下的温度状况。本文旨在比较机器学习(ML)方法对每小时室内空气温度的长期预测,其中预测仅基于室外气候条件。结果显示,基准方法(训练数据的算术平均值)的预测精度(平均绝对误差)在 0.78 ℃ 至 1.71 ℃ 之间,最佳方法的预测精度(平均绝对误差)在 0.5 ℃ 至 0.8 ℃ 之间。应使用多个数据集和足够长的测量周期对预测方法进行评估。对预测精度影响最大的因素是预测方法的选择,而优化方法、交叉验证分割数和气候变量滞后值的数量则是次要因素。基于决策树的方法,如 RandomForest、XGBoost、LightGBM 和 ExtraTreesRegressor,是预测精度、计算时间和对测量数据变化的稳健性的最佳组合。未来应定义通用数据集和基准系统,以便更好地比较用于室内空气温度预测的不同 ML 方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term prediction of hourly indoor air temperature using machine learning
Indoor air temperature is one of the key variables for indoor air quality, building energy consumption and moisture safety. Measurements are required to have accurate information on how well indoor air temperature during operation matches the target values set in the design phase. However, besides the information acquired during the measurements, we would also like to have a more comprehensive understanding on how the temperature conditions behave outside the measurement campaign, in different years and in future climatic conditions. The purpose of this paper is to compare machine learning (ML) methods for long-term prediction of hourly indoor air temperature, where the predictions are made based on outdoor climatic conditions only. According to results, the prediction accuracy (mean absolute error) was between 0.78 °C and 1.71 °C for the baseline method (arithmetic mean of training data) and between 0.5 °C and 0.8 °C for the best methods. Prediction methods should be evaluated using multiple datasets and with sufficiently long measurement periods. The most influential factor for prediction accuracy was the selection of the prediction method, whereas optimisation method, number of cross-validation splits and number of lagged values of the climatic variables were of secondary importance. The best combination of prediction accuracy, calculation time and robustness towards variation in measured data was found with decision-tree based methods, such as RandomForest, XGBoost, LightGBM and ExtraTreesRegressor. In the future common datasets and a benchmarking system should be defined for a better comparison of different ML methods for indoor air temperature prediction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
期刊最新文献
Ten differences of seasonal borehole thermal energy storage system from ground-source heat pump system Enhancing commercial building resiliency through microgrids with distributed energy sources and battery energy storage systems Operational and embodied energy of residential buildings in the Andean region between 1980 and 2020 Development and validation of the motivation for electricity saving behaviour scale (MESBS) among residents living in energy-efficient buildings in Sweden Hourly temperature downscaling method based on clustering and linear transformation: Utilizing mean, maximum, and minimum temperatures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1