晚期妊娠引产:羊膜腔切开术加早期催产素灌注与羊膜腔切开术加延迟 24 小时的催产素灌注。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Pub Date : 2024-11-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102875
Maina Jan , Sonia Guérin , Marie-Alice Yanni , Antoine Robin , Linda Lassel , Sonia Bhandari Randhawa , Rémi Béranger , Maela Le Lous
{"title":"晚期妊娠引产:羊膜腔切开术加早期催产素灌注与羊膜腔切开术加延迟 24 小时的催产素灌注。","authors":"Maina Jan ,&nbsp;Sonia Guérin ,&nbsp;Marie-Alice Yanni ,&nbsp;Antoine Robin ,&nbsp;Linda Lassel ,&nbsp;Sonia Bhandari Randhawa ,&nbsp;Rémi Béranger ,&nbsp;Maela Le Lous","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the maternal and fetal benefits of delaying oxytocin perfusion by 24 h following labor induction by amniotomy after 41 weeks of gestation (WG).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective review including all women with a vertex presentation fetus who had an indication for labor induction by amniotomy with or without oxytocin after 41 WG between 2015 and 2022. Patients who underwent an IOL by amniotomy followed by oxytocin perfusion within 0 to 4 hours (early oxytocin group: EO group) were compared with patients who underwent an IOL by amniotomy alone or followed by an oxytocin perfusion after an expectant period for up to 24 hours in the absence of a spontaneous onset of labor (delayed oxytocin group: DO group). The primary outcome was the rate of vaginal delivery (natural or operative). The secondary outcomes were maternal and neonatal complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 363 patients: 103 patients in the EO group and 260 in the DO group. Only 47 of the women in the DO group (18 %) required oxytocin. The proportion of vaginal deliveries was significantly higher in the DO group (248 patients, 95.4 %) than in the EO group (85 patients, 82.55 %) (<em>p</em>&lt;0.01). Maternal morbidity did not differ significantly between groups. Fewer babies displayed severe newborn acidemia or required transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit in the DO group (<em>p</em>&lt;0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Delaying oxytocin administration by 24 hours after amniotomy was associated with a significantly higher rate of vaginal delivery. These results required confirmation in prospective randomized studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Induction of labor in late-term pregnancy: amniotomy plus early oxytocin perfusion versus amniotomy plus oxytocin perfusion delayed by 24 h\",\"authors\":\"Maina Jan ,&nbsp;Sonia Guérin ,&nbsp;Marie-Alice Yanni ,&nbsp;Antoine Robin ,&nbsp;Linda Lassel ,&nbsp;Sonia Bhandari Randhawa ,&nbsp;Rémi Béranger ,&nbsp;Maela Le Lous\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the maternal and fetal benefits of delaying oxytocin perfusion by 24 h following labor induction by amniotomy after 41 weeks of gestation (WG).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective review including all women with a vertex presentation fetus who had an indication for labor induction by amniotomy with or without oxytocin after 41 WG between 2015 and 2022. Patients who underwent an IOL by amniotomy followed by oxytocin perfusion within 0 to 4 hours (early oxytocin group: EO group) were compared with patients who underwent an IOL by amniotomy alone or followed by an oxytocin perfusion after an expectant period for up to 24 hours in the absence of a spontaneous onset of labor (delayed oxytocin group: DO group). The primary outcome was the rate of vaginal delivery (natural or operative). The secondary outcomes were maternal and neonatal complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 363 patients: 103 patients in the EO group and 260 in the DO group. Only 47 of the women in the DO group (18 %) required oxytocin. The proportion of vaginal deliveries was significantly higher in the DO group (248 patients, 95.4 %) than in the EO group (85 patients, 82.55 %) (<em>p</em>&lt;0.01). Maternal morbidity did not differ significantly between groups. Fewer babies displayed severe newborn acidemia or required transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit in the DO group (<em>p</em>&lt;0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Delaying oxytocin administration by 24 hours after amniotomy was associated with a significantly higher rate of vaginal delivery. These results required confirmation in prospective randomized studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724001545\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724001545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估妊娠 41 周(WG)后羊膜腔切开术引产后延迟 24 小时灌注催产素对母体和胎儿的益处:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2015 年至 2022 年间有指征在妊娠 41 周后通过羊膜腔切开术进行引产(无论是否使用催产素)的所有顶位胎儿妇女。将在0至4小时内接受羊膜腔切开术引产并随后进行催产素灌注的患者(早期催产素组:EO组)与在没有自然临产的情况下单独接受羊膜腔切开术引产或在待产期长达24小时后进行催产素灌注的患者(延迟催产素组:DO组)进行了比较。主要结果是阴道分娩率(自然分娩或手术分娩)。次要结果为产妇和新生儿并发症:我们纳入了 363 名患者:结果:我们共纳入了 363 名患者:环氧乙烷组 103 名,DO 组 260 名。顺产组中只有 47 名产妇(18%)需要使用催产素。经阴道分娩组(248 名患者,95.4%)的比例明显高于经产道分娩组(85 名患者,82.55%)(p 结论:经阴道分娩组的产妇需要使用催产素:羊膜腔切开术后延迟 24 小时使用催产素与阴道分娩率明显增加有关。这些结果需要在前瞻性随机研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Induction of labor in late-term pregnancy: amniotomy plus early oxytocin perfusion versus amniotomy plus oxytocin perfusion delayed by 24 h

Objective

To assess the maternal and fetal benefits of delaying oxytocin perfusion by 24 h following labor induction by amniotomy after 41 weeks of gestation (WG).

Methods

We performed a retrospective review including all women with a vertex presentation fetus who had an indication for labor induction by amniotomy with or without oxytocin after 41 WG between 2015 and 2022. Patients who underwent an IOL by amniotomy followed by oxytocin perfusion within 0 to 4 hours (early oxytocin group: EO group) were compared with patients who underwent an IOL by amniotomy alone or followed by an oxytocin perfusion after an expectant period for up to 24 hours in the absence of a spontaneous onset of labor (delayed oxytocin group: DO group). The primary outcome was the rate of vaginal delivery (natural or operative). The secondary outcomes were maternal and neonatal complications.

Results

We included 363 patients: 103 patients in the EO group and 260 in the DO group. Only 47 of the women in the DO group (18 %) required oxytocin. The proportion of vaginal deliveries was significantly higher in the DO group (248 patients, 95.4 %) than in the EO group (85 patients, 82.55 %) (p<0.01). Maternal morbidity did not differ significantly between groups. Fewer babies displayed severe newborn acidemia or required transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit in the DO group (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Delaying oxytocin administration by 24 hours after amniotomy was associated with a significantly higher rate of vaginal delivery. These results required confirmation in prospective randomized studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Caracteristics of women presenting with Chronic Histiocytic Intervillositis during pregnancy: a case-control study. Anti N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor encephalitis during pregnancy: a case report. Interobserver agreement in CTG classification and clinical decision during labour: a comparison between STAN2007 and STAN2022 classifications Induction of labor in late-term pregnancy: amniotomy plus early oxytocin perfusion versus amniotomy plus oxytocin perfusion delayed by 24 h
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1