监测墨西哥奇瓦瓦大学人群对三种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的体液反应。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Infection in Developing Countries Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.3855/jidc.18707
Inés V Chavarría-Bencomo, Carlos Chavez-Trillo, Monica G López-Quiñonez, Jaime R Adame-Gallegos, Sandra Zurawski, Gerardo P Espino-Solis, Gerard Zurawski
{"title":"监测墨西哥奇瓦瓦大学人群对三种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的体液反应。","authors":"Inés V Chavarría-Bencomo, Carlos Chavez-Trillo, Monica G López-Quiñonez, Jaime R Adame-Gallegos, Sandra Zurawski, Gerardo P Espino-Solis, Gerard Zurawski","doi":"10.3855/jidc.18707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has spread worldwide since 2019. Survey of the antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is one of the most important measures of immunity since it can give an idea on the effectiveness of administered vaccines and the serologic status of individuals. We determined the concentrations of blood IgM and IgG against three SARS-CoV-2 proteins in vaccinated teachers and students among a university population from Chihuahua, Mexico.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Humoral response surveillance against the 3C-like proteinase (3CLpro), nuclear protein (NP), and receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 was carried out. A total of 239 samples were analyzed: 67 from teachers who were vaccinated with CanSino and 172 from students (27.9% were vaccinated with AstraZeneca, 32.6% with Sinovac, 24.4% with Pfizer-BioNTech, 15.1% with other vaccines).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in the levels of IgG were observed between serum from individuals prior to vaccination (preimmunization serum) and from those that were vaccinated with CanSino. However, samples from asymptomatic individuals did not show differences between the preimmunization and post-immunization serum. The three vaccinated groups (AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Sinovac) did not show significant differences in anti-RBD IgG antibody titers compared to the positive control group, except for a Pfizer non-COVID-19 subgroup where the level of antibodies in the Pfizer group was 1.7 times higher. Neither vaccine group showed significant differences between those individuals who previously had COVID-19 and uninfected individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results provide a picture of the situation at the time when in-person classes resumed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","volume":"18 9.1","pages":"S135-S146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring humoral responses against three SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in a university population from Chihuahua, Mexico.\",\"authors\":\"Inés V Chavarría-Bencomo, Carlos Chavez-Trillo, Monica G López-Quiñonez, Jaime R Adame-Gallegos, Sandra Zurawski, Gerardo P Espino-Solis, Gerard Zurawski\",\"doi\":\"10.3855/jidc.18707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has spread worldwide since 2019. Survey of the antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is one of the most important measures of immunity since it can give an idea on the effectiveness of administered vaccines and the serologic status of individuals. We determined the concentrations of blood IgM and IgG against three SARS-CoV-2 proteins in vaccinated teachers and students among a university population from Chihuahua, Mexico.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Humoral response surveillance against the 3C-like proteinase (3CLpro), nuclear protein (NP), and receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 was carried out. A total of 239 samples were analyzed: 67 from teachers who were vaccinated with CanSino and 172 from students (27.9% were vaccinated with AstraZeneca, 32.6% with Sinovac, 24.4% with Pfizer-BioNTech, 15.1% with other vaccines).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in the levels of IgG were observed between serum from individuals prior to vaccination (preimmunization serum) and from those that were vaccinated with CanSino. However, samples from asymptomatic individuals did not show differences between the preimmunization and post-immunization serum. The three vaccinated groups (AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Sinovac) did not show significant differences in anti-RBD IgG antibody titers compared to the positive control group, except for a Pfizer non-COVID-19 subgroup where the level of antibodies in the Pfizer group was 1.7 times higher. Neither vaccine group showed significant differences between those individuals who previously had COVID-19 and uninfected individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results provide a picture of the situation at the time when in-person classes resumed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries\",\"volume\":\"18 9.1\",\"pages\":\"S135-S146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.18707\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.18707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒-2(SARS-CoV-2)是 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的病原体,自 2019 年以来已在全球蔓延。针对 SARS-CoV-2 的抗体调查是衡量免疫力最重要的指标之一,因为它可以了解接种疫苗的效果和个人的血清学状况。方法:对 SARS-CoV-2 的 3C 样蛋白酶 (3CLpro)、核蛋白 (NP) 和受体结合域 (RBD) 进行了体液反应监测。共分析了 239 份样本:67 份来自接种了康希诺疫苗的教师,172 份来自学生(其中 27.9% 接种了阿斯利康疫苗,32.6% 接种了华卫疫苗,24.4% 接种了辉瑞生物疫苗,15.1% 接种了其他疫苗):接种疫苗前的个人血清(免疫前血清)与接种过加信诺疫苗的个人血清中的 IgG 水平存在显著差异。然而,无症状个体的血清样本在免疫前和免疫后血清中没有显示出差异。三个接种组(阿斯利康、辉瑞和 Sinovac)的抗 RBD IgG 抗体滴度与阳性对照组相比没有明显差异,只有辉瑞非 COVID-19 亚组的抗体水平是阳性对照组的 1.7 倍。两组疫苗在曾感染过 COVID-19 的人群和未感染人群之间均未显示出明显差异:这些结果提供了恢复面授课程时的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monitoring humoral responses against three SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in a university population from Chihuahua, Mexico.

Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has spread worldwide since 2019. Survey of the antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is one of the most important measures of immunity since it can give an idea on the effectiveness of administered vaccines and the serologic status of individuals. We determined the concentrations of blood IgM and IgG against three SARS-CoV-2 proteins in vaccinated teachers and students among a university population from Chihuahua, Mexico.

Methodology: Humoral response surveillance against the 3C-like proteinase (3CLpro), nuclear protein (NP), and receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 was carried out. A total of 239 samples were analyzed: 67 from teachers who were vaccinated with CanSino and 172 from students (27.9% were vaccinated with AstraZeneca, 32.6% with Sinovac, 24.4% with Pfizer-BioNTech, 15.1% with other vaccines).

Results: Significant differences in the levels of IgG were observed between serum from individuals prior to vaccination (preimmunization serum) and from those that were vaccinated with CanSino. However, samples from asymptomatic individuals did not show differences between the preimmunization and post-immunization serum. The three vaccinated groups (AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Sinovac) did not show significant differences in anti-RBD IgG antibody titers compared to the positive control group, except for a Pfizer non-COVID-19 subgroup where the level of antibodies in the Pfizer group was 1.7 times higher. Neither vaccine group showed significant differences between those individuals who previously had COVID-19 and uninfected individuals.

Conclusions: These results provide a picture of the situation at the time when in-person classes resumed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
239
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries (JIDC) is an international journal, intended for the publication of scientific articles from Developing Countries by scientists from Developing Countries. JIDC is an independent, on-line publication with an international editorial board. JIDC is open access with no cost to view or download articles and reasonable cost for publication of research artcles, making JIDC easily availiable to scientists from resource restricted regions.
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics, depression, anxiety, and stress of medical workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey. Clinical profile of patients with surgical brain abscesses and etiology in a reference hospital. Constructing a predictive model based on peripheral blood signs to differentiate infectious mononucleosis from chronic active EBV infection. Correlation of the severity of the clinical presentation of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia with respiratory function parameters in the post-COVID period. Distribution of vectors and arboviruses, and healthcare workers' knowledge of vector-borne diseases in Armenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1