Nico van de Merbel, Mark Jean Gnoth, Amanda Wilson, Peter Blattmann, Benno Ingelse, Gregor Jordan, Fabrizia Fusetti, Michael Blackburn, Sune Hove Sporring, Iain Love, Stephane Muccio, Matthew Barfield, Rob Wheller, Philip Timmerman
{"title":"透视研究和监管生物分析中用于生物治疗和生物标记蛋白质的液相色谱-质谱联用仪(/MS):欧洲生物分析论坛社区十多年来的经验总结(第 2 部分:\"如何\")。","authors":"Nico van de Merbel, Mark Jean Gnoth, Amanda Wilson, Peter Blattmann, Benno Ingelse, Gregor Jordan, Fabrizia Fusetti, Michael Blackburn, Sune Hove Sporring, Iain Love, Stephane Muccio, Matthew Barfield, Rob Wheller, Philip Timmerman","doi":"10.1080/17576180.2024.2418251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following up on our most recent discussion paper focussing on the continued regulatory challenges for bioanalysis of biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins with LC-MS/MS, the European Bioanalysis Forum reports back on their internal discussions on and experience with method development for biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins in research and regulated Bioanalysis. Due to the broad array of topics discussed, this information is spread over two research papers, where one focusses on the fundamental principles on which the technology is built (i.e., the what) and another on the practical considerations (i.e., the how). In this paper, we discuss 'the how'. Both papers should be helpful for the bioanalytical community to better understand the challenges and provide an insight on why bioanalysis of biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins with LC-MS/MS should not be compared with the more traditional LC-MS/MS assay for small molecules or ligand binding assays for biotherapeutics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8797,"journal":{"name":"Bioanalysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspective on LC-MS(/MS) for biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins in research and regulated Bioanalysis: a consolidation of more than a decade of experience across the European Bioanalysis Forum community (Part 2: \\\"The How\\\").\",\"authors\":\"Nico van de Merbel, Mark Jean Gnoth, Amanda Wilson, Peter Blattmann, Benno Ingelse, Gregor Jordan, Fabrizia Fusetti, Michael Blackburn, Sune Hove Sporring, Iain Love, Stephane Muccio, Matthew Barfield, Rob Wheller, Philip Timmerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17576180.2024.2418251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Following up on our most recent discussion paper focussing on the continued regulatory challenges for bioanalysis of biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins with LC-MS/MS, the European Bioanalysis Forum reports back on their internal discussions on and experience with method development for biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins in research and regulated Bioanalysis. Due to the broad array of topics discussed, this information is spread over two research papers, where one focusses on the fundamental principles on which the technology is built (i.e., the what) and another on the practical considerations (i.e., the how). In this paper, we discuss 'the how'. Both papers should be helpful for the bioanalytical community to better understand the challenges and provide an insight on why bioanalysis of biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins with LC-MS/MS should not be compared with the more traditional LC-MS/MS assay for small molecules or ligand binding assays for biotherapeutics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2024.2418251\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2024.2418251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perspective on LC-MS(/MS) for biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins in research and regulated Bioanalysis: a consolidation of more than a decade of experience across the European Bioanalysis Forum community (Part 2: "The How").
Following up on our most recent discussion paper focussing on the continued regulatory challenges for bioanalysis of biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins with LC-MS/MS, the European Bioanalysis Forum reports back on their internal discussions on and experience with method development for biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins in research and regulated Bioanalysis. Due to the broad array of topics discussed, this information is spread over two research papers, where one focusses on the fundamental principles on which the technology is built (i.e., the what) and another on the practical considerations (i.e., the how). In this paper, we discuss 'the how'. Both papers should be helpful for the bioanalytical community to better understand the challenges and provide an insight on why bioanalysis of biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins with LC-MS/MS should not be compared with the more traditional LC-MS/MS assay for small molecules or ligand binding assays for biotherapeutics.
BioanalysisBIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍:
Reliable data obtained from selective, sensitive and reproducible analysis of xenobiotics and biotics in biological samples is a fundamental and crucial part of every successful drug development program. The same principles can also apply to many other areas of research such as forensic science, toxicology and sports doping testing.
The bioanalytical field incorporates sophisticated techniques linking sample preparation and advanced separations with MS and NMR detection systems, automation and robotics. Standards set by regulatory bodies regarding method development and validation increasingly define the boundaries between speed and quality.
Bioanalysis is a progressive discipline for which the future holds many exciting opportunities to further reduce sample volumes, analysis cost and environmental impact, as well as to improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, efficiency, assay throughput, data quality, data handling and processing.
The journal Bioanalysis focuses on the techniques and methods used for the detection or quantitative study of analytes in human or animal biological samples. Bioanalysis encourages the submission of articles describing forward-looking applications, including biosensors, microfluidics, miniaturized analytical devices, and new hyphenated and multi-dimensional techniques.
Bioanalysis delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for the modern bioanalyst.