轴对称膜纳米谐振器:非线性降阶模型比较

IF 2.8 3区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2024.104933
Safvan Palathingal , Dominic Vella
{"title":"轴对称膜纳米谐振器:非线性降阶模型比较","authors":"Safvan Palathingal ,&nbsp;Dominic Vella","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2024.104933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The shift in the backbone of the frequency–response curve and the ‘jump-down’ observed at a critical frequency observed in nano-resonators are caused by their nonlinear mechanical response. The shift and jump-down point are therefore often used to infer the mechanical properties that underlie the nonlinear response, particularly the resonator’s stretching modulus. To facilitate this, the resonators’ dynamics are often modelled using a Galerkin-type numerical approach or lumped ordinary differential equations like the Duffing equation, that incorporate an appropriate nonlinearity. To understand the source of the problem’s nonlinearities, we first develop an axisymmetric but spatially-varying model of a membrane resonator subject to a uniform oscillatory load with linear damping. We then derive asymptotic solutions for the resulting partial differential equations (PDEs) using the Method of Multiple Scales (MS), which allows a systematic reduction to a Duffing-like equation with analytically determined coefficients. We also solve the PDEs numerically via the method of lines. By comparing the numerical solutions with the asymptotic results, we demonstrate that the numerical approach reveals a non-constant maximum compliance with increasing load, which contradicts the predictions of the MS analysis. In contrast, we show that combining a Galerkin decomposition with the Harmonic Balance Method accurately captures the non-constant maximum compliance and reliably predicts jump-down behaviour. We analyse the resulting frequency–response predictions derived from these methods. We also argue that fitting based on the jump-down point may be sensitive to noise and discuss strategies for fitting frequency–response curves from experimental data to theory that are robust to this.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50303,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Axisymmetric membrane nano-resonators: A comparison of nonlinear reduced-order models\",\"authors\":\"Safvan Palathingal ,&nbsp;Dominic Vella\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2024.104933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The shift in the backbone of the frequency–response curve and the ‘jump-down’ observed at a critical frequency observed in nano-resonators are caused by their nonlinear mechanical response. The shift and jump-down point are therefore often used to infer the mechanical properties that underlie the nonlinear response, particularly the resonator’s stretching modulus. To facilitate this, the resonators’ dynamics are often modelled using a Galerkin-type numerical approach or lumped ordinary differential equations like the Duffing equation, that incorporate an appropriate nonlinearity. To understand the source of the problem’s nonlinearities, we first develop an axisymmetric but spatially-varying model of a membrane resonator subject to a uniform oscillatory load with linear damping. We then derive asymptotic solutions for the resulting partial differential equations (PDEs) using the Method of Multiple Scales (MS), which allows a systematic reduction to a Duffing-like equation with analytically determined coefficients. We also solve the PDEs numerically via the method of lines. By comparing the numerical solutions with the asymptotic results, we demonstrate that the numerical approach reveals a non-constant maximum compliance with increasing load, which contradicts the predictions of the MS analysis. In contrast, we show that combining a Galerkin decomposition with the Harmonic Balance Method accurately captures the non-constant maximum compliance and reliably predicts jump-down behaviour. We analyse the resulting frequency–response predictions derived from these methods. We also argue that fitting based on the jump-down point may be sensitive to noise and discuss strategies for fitting frequency–response curves from experimental data to theory that are robust to this.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020746224002981\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020746224002981","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在纳米谐振器中观察到的频率响应曲线主干线的偏移和临界频率的 "跳降 "是由其非线性机械响应引起的。因此,移位和下跳点通常用于推断非线性响应的机械特性,特别是谐振器的拉伸模量。为此,通常使用 Galerkin 类型的数值方法或包含适当非线性的 Duffing 方程等整数常微分方程来模拟谐振器的动态。为了了解问题的非线性来源,我们首先建立了一个轴对称但空间变化的膜谐振器模型,该模型受到具有线性阻尼的均匀振荡负载的影响。然后,我们利用多重尺度法(MS)推导出由此产生的偏微分方程(PDEs)的渐近解,该方法允许系统地还原为具有分析确定系数的类达芬方程。我们还通过线性方法对 PDE 进行数值求解。通过比较数值解与渐近结果,我们发现数值方法揭示了随着载荷增加的非恒定最大顺应性,这与 MS 分析的预测相矛盾。与此相反,我们的研究表明,将 Galerkin 分解法与谐波平衡法相结合,可以准确地捕捉到非恒定的最大顺应性,并可靠地预测出跳降行为。我们分析了这些方法得出的频率响应预测结果。我们还认为,基于跳降点的拟合可能会对噪声敏感,并讨论了从实验数据到理论的频率响应曲线拟合策略,这些策略对噪声具有鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Axisymmetric membrane nano-resonators: A comparison of nonlinear reduced-order models
The shift in the backbone of the frequency–response curve and the ‘jump-down’ observed at a critical frequency observed in nano-resonators are caused by their nonlinear mechanical response. The shift and jump-down point are therefore often used to infer the mechanical properties that underlie the nonlinear response, particularly the resonator’s stretching modulus. To facilitate this, the resonators’ dynamics are often modelled using a Galerkin-type numerical approach or lumped ordinary differential equations like the Duffing equation, that incorporate an appropriate nonlinearity. To understand the source of the problem’s nonlinearities, we first develop an axisymmetric but spatially-varying model of a membrane resonator subject to a uniform oscillatory load with linear damping. We then derive asymptotic solutions for the resulting partial differential equations (PDEs) using the Method of Multiple Scales (MS), which allows a systematic reduction to a Duffing-like equation with analytically determined coefficients. We also solve the PDEs numerically via the method of lines. By comparing the numerical solutions with the asymptotic results, we demonstrate that the numerical approach reveals a non-constant maximum compliance with increasing load, which contradicts the predictions of the MS analysis. In contrast, we show that combining a Galerkin decomposition with the Harmonic Balance Method accurately captures the non-constant maximum compliance and reliably predicts jump-down behaviour. We analyse the resulting frequency–response predictions derived from these methods. We also argue that fitting based on the jump-down point may be sensitive to noise and discuss strategies for fitting frequency–response curves from experimental data to theory that are robust to this.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
192
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics provides a specific medium for dissemination of high-quality research results in the various areas of theoretical, applied, and experimental mechanics of solids, fluids, structures, and systems where the phenomena are inherently non-linear. The journal brings together original results in non-linear problems in elasticity, plasticity, dynamics, vibrations, wave-propagation, rheology, fluid-structure interaction systems, stability, biomechanics, micro- and nano-structures, materials, metamaterials, and in other diverse areas. Papers may be analytical, computational or experimental in nature. Treatments of non-linear differential equations wherein solutions and properties of solutions are emphasized but physical aspects are not adequately relevant, will not be considered for possible publication. Both deterministic and stochastic approaches are fostered. Contributions pertaining to both established and emerging fields are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Data-driven bifurcation analysis using parameter-dependent trajectories Nonlinear vibration analysis of composite and functionally graded material shell structures: A literature review from 2013 to 2023 Shakedown analysis of incompressible materials under cyclic loads: A locking-free CS-FEM-Q5 numerical approach Axisymmetric membrane nano-resonators: A comparison of nonlinear reduced-order models Vibration control of two portal frames type shear buildings through self-synchronous dynamics of two non-ideal sources indirectly coupled
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1