{"title":"印度和挪威公众对航空排放政策的支持：跨国比较","authors":"Steffen Kallbekken, Sofie W. Skjeflo","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2024.104468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine public support for four policy instruments to reduce aviation emissions in India and Norway, analysing the determinants of support and the effect of information provision. Support is significantly higher in India, with coercive policies being the least popular. Perceived policy effectiveness and belief in anthropogenic climate change are strong predictors of support, whereas socio-economic predictors are largely insignificant. Respondents overestimate aviation’s CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, with misperceptions affecting policy support. Providing factual information on aviation’s global emissions reduces support for jet fuel tax but not for other policies. Information about emissions from frequent flyers does not affect support levels. Findings highlight the influence of public perceptions and beliefs on policy support and suggest that while targeted information can modify attitudes, additional strategies are needed to boost support for aviation climate policies. Policymakers should note the public’s preference for proactive policies, indicating an opportunity to implement advanced, sustainable technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 104468"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public support for aviation emission policies in India and Norway: Cross-country comparison\",\"authors\":\"Steffen Kallbekken, Sofie W. Skjeflo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2024.104468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We examine public support for four policy instruments to reduce aviation emissions in India and Norway, analysing the determinants of support and the effect of information provision. Support is significantly higher in India, with coercive policies being the least popular. Perceived policy effectiveness and belief in anthropogenic climate change are strong predictors of support, whereas socio-economic predictors are largely insignificant. Respondents overestimate aviation’s CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, with misperceptions affecting policy support. Providing factual information on aviation’s global emissions reduces support for jet fuel tax but not for other policies. Information about emissions from frequent flyers does not affect support levels. Findings highlight the influence of public perceptions and beliefs on policy support and suggest that while targeted information can modify attitudes, additional strategies are needed to boost support for aviation climate policies. Policymakers should note the public’s preference for proactive policies, indicating an opportunity to implement advanced, sustainable technologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920924004255\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920924004255","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Public support for aviation emission policies in India and Norway: Cross-country comparison
We examine public support for four policy instruments to reduce aviation emissions in India and Norway, analysing the determinants of support and the effect of information provision. Support is significantly higher in India, with coercive policies being the least popular. Perceived policy effectiveness and belief in anthropogenic climate change are strong predictors of support, whereas socio-economic predictors are largely insignificant. Respondents overestimate aviation’s CO2 emissions, with misperceptions affecting policy support. Providing factual information on aviation’s global emissions reduces support for jet fuel tax but not for other policies. Information about emissions from frequent flyers does not affect support levels. Findings highlight the influence of public perceptions and beliefs on policy support and suggest that while targeted information can modify attitudes, additional strategies are needed to boost support for aviation climate policies. Policymakers should note the public’s preference for proactive policies, indicating an opportunity to implement advanced, sustainable technologies.
期刊介绍：
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution.
We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
