美国限制堕胎对母婴健康造成的后果

IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102938
Graham Gardner
{"title":"美国限制堕胎对母婴健康造成的后果","authors":"Graham Gardner","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since the recent US Supreme Court decision in <em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</em>, people across the country have experienced large sudden changes in their access to abortion care. In this paper, I look to the history of abortion access in the United States to inform predictions for this new future. I study the effects of targeted regulations on abortion providers (TRAP laws) on a variety of maternal and infant health outcomes, using variation in the timing of policy adoption across states and a direct measure of the distance to an abortion provider. I implement difference-in-differences techniques across outcomes from restricted-use microdata on the universe of US births. I find that TRAP laws lead to 11–16 % increased rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Additionally, I find evidence that TRAP laws widen existing disparities in adverse infant health outcomes across parental race. These results demonstrate the potentially wide-ranging health effects of restricting access to abortion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 102938"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The maternal and infant health consequences of restricted access to abortion in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Graham Gardner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Since the recent US Supreme Court decision in <em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</em>, people across the country have experienced large sudden changes in their access to abortion care. In this paper, I look to the history of abortion access in the United States to inform predictions for this new future. I study the effects of targeted regulations on abortion providers (TRAP laws) on a variety of maternal and infant health outcomes, using variation in the timing of policy adoption across states and a direct measure of the distance to an abortion provider. I implement difference-in-differences techniques across outcomes from restricted-use microdata on the universe of US births. I find that TRAP laws lead to 11–16 % increased rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Additionally, I find evidence that TRAP laws widen existing disparities in adverse infant health outcomes across parental race. These results demonstrate the potentially wide-ranging health effects of restricting access to abortion.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102938\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629624000833\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629624000833","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自美国最高法院最近对多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织一案做出裁决以来,全国各地的人们在获得堕胎护理方面经历了巨大的突变。在本文中,我将从美国堕胎的历史来预测这一新的未来。我研究了针对堕胎服务提供者的法规(TRAP 法律)对各种母婴健康结果的影响,研究中使用了各州政策采用时间的变化以及与堕胎服务提供者距离的直接测量方法。我从美国出生人口的限用微观数据中采用了不同结果间的差异技术。我发现,TRAP 法律导致妊娠高血压疾病的发病率增加了 11-16%。此外,我还发现有证据表明,TRAP 法扩大了父母种族间在婴儿不良健康结果方面的现有差距。这些结果表明,限制堕胎可能会对健康产生广泛的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The maternal and infant health consequences of restricted access to abortion in the United States
Since the recent US Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, people across the country have experienced large sudden changes in their access to abortion care. In this paper, I look to the history of abortion access in the United States to inform predictions for this new future. I study the effects of targeted regulations on abortion providers (TRAP laws) on a variety of maternal and infant health outcomes, using variation in the timing of policy adoption across states and a direct measure of the distance to an abortion provider. I implement difference-in-differences techniques across outcomes from restricted-use microdata on the universe of US births. I find that TRAP laws lead to 11–16 % increased rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Additionally, I find evidence that TRAP laws widen existing disparities in adverse infant health outcomes across parental race. These results demonstrate the potentially wide-ranging health effects of restricting access to abortion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Economics
Journal of Health Economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
96
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: This journal seeks articles related to the economics of health and medical care. Its scope will include the following topics: Production and supply of health services; Demand and utilization of health services; Financing of health services; Determinants of health, including investments in health and risky health behaviors; Economic consequences of ill-health; Behavioral models of demanders, suppliers and other health care agencies; Evaluation of policy interventions that yield economic insights; Efficiency and distributional aspects of health policy; and such other topics as the Editors may deem appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Universal free school meals and children’s bodyweight. Impacts by age and duration of exposure Put a bet on it: Can self-funded commitment contracts curb fitness procrastination? Universal Credit: Welfare reform and mental health Health implications of housing retrofits: Evidence from a population-wide weatherization program Do mandatory waiting periods for abortion increase intimate partner violence?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1