{"title":"微波极坐标观测与辐射传输模拟不一致之谜","authors":"Ziqiang Zhu, Fuzhong Weng","doi":"10.1029/2024GL111553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A factor of 2 difference is found between microwave brightness temperature (TB) observations and simulations from vector radiative transfer models. A physical explanation of this difference is related to the calibration process. In principle, for the calibration of polarimetric instruments of a total power radiometer, the radiation should be only half of the values derived from Planck function but in the actual calibration process, a full value is used. When this full value is converted to a TB it is approximately, but not exactly, twice the TB simulated by a vector radiative transfer model. This inconsistency is verified by simulations of three conically scanning microwave imagers (WindSat, AMSR2 and MWRI) and one cross-track scanning microwave sounder (AMSU-A). This difference cannot be compensated simply by dividing a factor of 2 to the processed TBs, especially at high frequencies or at low physical temperatures due to the nonlinear property of Planck function.</p>","PeriodicalId":12523,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Research Letters","volume":"51 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL111553","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Mystery of the Inconsistency Between Microwave Polarimetric Observations and Radiative Transfer Simulations\",\"authors\":\"Ziqiang Zhu, Fuzhong Weng\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024GL111553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A factor of 2 difference is found between microwave brightness temperature (TB) observations and simulations from vector radiative transfer models. A physical explanation of this difference is related to the calibration process. In principle, for the calibration of polarimetric instruments of a total power radiometer, the radiation should be only half of the values derived from Planck function but in the actual calibration process, a full value is used. When this full value is converted to a TB it is approximately, but not exactly, twice the TB simulated by a vector radiative transfer model. This inconsistency is verified by simulations of three conically scanning microwave imagers (WindSat, AMSR2 and MWRI) and one cross-track scanning microwave sounder (AMSU-A). This difference cannot be compensated simply by dividing a factor of 2 to the processed TBs, especially at high frequencies or at low physical temperatures due to the nonlinear property of Planck function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"51 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL111553\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL111553\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL111553","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Mystery of the Inconsistency Between Microwave Polarimetric Observations and Radiative Transfer Simulations
A factor of 2 difference is found between microwave brightness temperature (TB) observations and simulations from vector radiative transfer models. A physical explanation of this difference is related to the calibration process. In principle, for the calibration of polarimetric instruments of a total power radiometer, the radiation should be only half of the values derived from Planck function but in the actual calibration process, a full value is used. When this full value is converted to a TB it is approximately, but not exactly, twice the TB simulated by a vector radiative transfer model. This inconsistency is verified by simulations of three conically scanning microwave imagers (WindSat, AMSR2 and MWRI) and one cross-track scanning microwave sounder (AMSU-A). This difference cannot be compensated simply by dividing a factor of 2 to the processed TBs, especially at high frequencies or at low physical temperatures due to the nonlinear property of Planck function.
期刊介绍:
Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) publishes high-impact, innovative, and timely research on major scientific advances in all the major geoscience disciplines. Papers are communications-length articles and should have broad and immediate implications in their discipline or across the geosciences. GRLmaintains the fastest turn-around of all high-impact publications in the geosciences and works closely with authors to ensure broad visibility of top papers.