Grant R Martsolf, Christopher Tollefsen, Farr Curlin
{"title":"堕胎是一种保健:在什么意义上?","authors":"Grant R Martsolf, Christopher Tollefsen, Farr Curlin","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the wake of Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization, many nursing organizations asserted that \"abortion is health care\" and access to it must be protected. Such a phrase makes clear claims about the meanings of \"health\" and \"care.\" How one defines these terms gives decisive direction to how a nurse must practice regarding not just elective abortion but also myriad interventions that divide bioethicists, including gender affirmative care, cosmetic surgery, and euthanasia. We consider the issue of elective abortion to illustrate the nature of disputes about the scope and limits of professional nursing. We describe two competing intuitions about the nature of health care namely that health care is either for (a) health, objectively defined or (b) well-being, patient defined. We discuss how these intuitions lead to different understandings of the intelligibility of the phrase \"abortion is health care\" and the implications for ethical discourse within professional nursing.</p>","PeriodicalId":54705,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Outlook","volume":" ","pages":"102307"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abortion is healthcare: In what sense?\",\"authors\":\"Grant R Martsolf, Christopher Tollefsen, Farr Curlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the wake of Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization, many nursing organizations asserted that \\\"abortion is health care\\\" and access to it must be protected. Such a phrase makes clear claims about the meanings of \\\"health\\\" and \\\"care.\\\" How one defines these terms gives decisive direction to how a nurse must practice regarding not just elective abortion but also myriad interventions that divide bioethicists, including gender affirmative care, cosmetic surgery, and euthanasia. We consider the issue of elective abortion to illustrate the nature of disputes about the scope and limits of professional nursing. We describe two competing intuitions about the nature of health care namely that health care is either for (a) health, objectively defined or (b) well-being, patient defined. We discuss how these intuitions lead to different understandings of the intelligibility of the phrase \\\"abortion is health care\\\" and the implications for ethical discourse within professional nursing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102307\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102307","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
In the wake of Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization, many nursing organizations asserted that "abortion is health care" and access to it must be protected. Such a phrase makes clear claims about the meanings of "health" and "care." How one defines these terms gives decisive direction to how a nurse must practice regarding not just elective abortion but also myriad interventions that divide bioethicists, including gender affirmative care, cosmetic surgery, and euthanasia. We consider the issue of elective abortion to illustrate the nature of disputes about the scope and limits of professional nursing. We describe two competing intuitions about the nature of health care namely that health care is either for (a) health, objectively defined or (b) well-being, patient defined. We discuss how these intuitions lead to different understandings of the intelligibility of the phrase "abortion is health care" and the implications for ethical discourse within professional nursing.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Outlook, a bimonthly journal, provides innovative ideas for nursing leaders through peer-reviewed articles and timely reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in nursing practice, education, and research, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. Nursing Outlook is the official journal of the American Academy of Nursing and the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science and supports their mission to serve the public and the nursing profession by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. The journal is included in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Journal Citation Reports published by Clarivate Analytics.