Long Jin, Ke Li, Zhimin Li, Xuankai Huang, Li Wang, Xibiao Wang, Shengwei Di, Shiquan Cui, Yuan Xu
{"title":"调查影响迷你猪肌内脂肪沉积的关键肠道微生物","authors":"Long Jin, Ke Li, Zhimin Li, Xuankai Huang, Li Wang, Xibiao Wang, Shengwei Di, Shiquan Cui, Yuan Xu","doi":"10.3390/ani14213123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine the pivotal microorganisms affecting intramuscular fat (IMF) accumulation in Min pigs and to discern the extent of the influence exerted by various intestinal segments on IMF-related traits, we sequenced 16S rRNA from the contents of six intestinal segments from a high IMF group (Group H) and a low IMF group (Group L) of Min pigs weighing 90 ± 1 kg. We then compared their diversity and disparities in bacterial genera. Group H exhibited considerably higher α diversity in the jejunum and colon than Group L (<i>p</i> < 0.05). When 95% confidence levels were considered, the main β diversity components for the ileum, caecum, and colon within Groups H and L exhibited absolute segregation. Accordingly, 31 differentially abundant genera across Group H were pinpointed via LEfSe and the Wilcoxon test (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and subsequently scrutinised based on their distribution and abundance across distinct intestinal segments and their correlation with IMF phenotypes. The abundances of <i>Terrisporobacter</i>, <i>Acetitomaculum</i>, <i>Bacteroides</i>, <i>Fibrobacter</i>, <i>Treponema</i>, <i>Akkermansia</i>, <i>Blautia</i>, <i>Clostridium sensu stricto 1</i>, <i>Turicibacter</i>, <i>Subdoligranulum</i>, the <i>[Eubacterium] siraeum group</i>, and <i>dgA 11 gut groups</i> were positively correlated with IMF content (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas those of <i>Bacillus</i>, the <i>Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 group</i>, <i>Streptococcus</i>, <i>Roseburia</i>, <i>Solobacterium</i>, <i>Veillonella</i>, <i>Lactobacillus</i>, the <i>Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group</i>, <i>Anaerovibrio</i>, and the <i>Lachnospiraceae AC2044 group</i> were negatively associated with IMF content (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Employing PICRUSt2 for predicting intergenic metabolic pathways that differ among intestinal microbial communities revealed that within the 95% confidence interval the colonic microbiome was enriched with the most metabolic pathways, including those related to lipid metabolism. The diversity results, bacterial genus distributions, and metabolic pathway disparities revealed the colonic segment as an influential region for IMF deposition.</p>","PeriodicalId":7955,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"14 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation into Critical Gut Microbes Influencing Intramuscular Fat Deposition in Min Pigs.\",\"authors\":\"Long Jin, Ke Li, Zhimin Li, Xuankai Huang, Li Wang, Xibiao Wang, Shengwei Di, Shiquan Cui, Yuan Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ani14213123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To determine the pivotal microorganisms affecting intramuscular fat (IMF) accumulation in Min pigs and to discern the extent of the influence exerted by various intestinal segments on IMF-related traits, we sequenced 16S rRNA from the contents of six intestinal segments from a high IMF group (Group H) and a low IMF group (Group L) of Min pigs weighing 90 ± 1 kg. We then compared their diversity and disparities in bacterial genera. Group H exhibited considerably higher α diversity in the jejunum and colon than Group L (<i>p</i> < 0.05). When 95% confidence levels were considered, the main β diversity components for the ileum, caecum, and colon within Groups H and L exhibited absolute segregation. Accordingly, 31 differentially abundant genera across Group H were pinpointed via LEfSe and the Wilcoxon test (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and subsequently scrutinised based on their distribution and abundance across distinct intestinal segments and their correlation with IMF phenotypes. The abundances of <i>Terrisporobacter</i>, <i>Acetitomaculum</i>, <i>Bacteroides</i>, <i>Fibrobacter</i>, <i>Treponema</i>, <i>Akkermansia</i>, <i>Blautia</i>, <i>Clostridium sensu stricto 1</i>, <i>Turicibacter</i>, <i>Subdoligranulum</i>, the <i>[Eubacterium] siraeum group</i>, and <i>dgA 11 gut groups</i> were positively correlated with IMF content (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas those of <i>Bacillus</i>, the <i>Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 group</i>, <i>Streptococcus</i>, <i>Roseburia</i>, <i>Solobacterium</i>, <i>Veillonella</i>, <i>Lactobacillus</i>, the <i>Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group</i>, <i>Anaerovibrio</i>, and the <i>Lachnospiraceae AC2044 group</i> were negatively associated with IMF content (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Employing PICRUSt2 for predicting intergenic metabolic pathways that differ among intestinal microbial communities revealed that within the 95% confidence interval the colonic microbiome was enriched with the most metabolic pathways, including those related to lipid metabolism. The diversity results, bacterial genus distributions, and metabolic pathway disparities revealed the colonic segment as an influential region for IMF deposition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animals\",\"volume\":\"14 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545367/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14213123\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14213123","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
为了确定影响闽猪肌内脂肪(IMF)积累的关键微生物,并分辨不同肠段对 IMF 相关性状的影响程度,我们对体重为 90 ± 1 kg 的高 IMF 组(H 组)和低 IMF 组(L 组)闽猪的六个肠段内容物的 16S rRNA 进行了测序。然后,我们比较了它们细菌属的多样性和差异。H 组空肠和结肠的 α 多样性明显高于 L 组(p < 0.05)。考虑到 95% 的置信度,H 组和 L 组回肠、盲肠和结肠的主要 β 多样性成分呈现绝对分离。因此,通过 LEfSe 和 Wilcoxon 检验(p < 0.05)确定了 H 组中 31 个差异丰度种属,随后根据它们在不同肠段的分布和丰度及其与 IMF 表型的相关性进行了仔细研究。Terrisporobacter、Acetitomaculum、Bacteroides、Fibrobacter、Treponema、Akkermansia、Blautia、Clostridium sensu stricto 1、Turisibacter、Subdoligranulum、[Eubacterium] siraeum 组和 dgA 11 肠道组的丰度与 IMF 含量呈正相关(p < 0.05),而芽孢杆菌、拉克诺斯弧菌科 NK4A136 菌群、链球菌、Roseburia 菌群、溶杆菌、Veillonella 菌群、乳酸杆菌、Rikenellaceae RC9 肠道菌群、Anaerovibrio 菌群和拉克诺斯弧菌科 AC2044 菌群与 IMF 含量呈负相关(p < 0.05)。利用 PICRUSt2 预测肠道微生物群落间不同的基因间代谢途径发现,在 95% 的置信区间内,结肠微生物群落富含最多的代谢途径,包括与脂质代谢相关的途径。多样性结果、细菌属种分布和代谢途径差异显示,结肠段是 IMF 沉积的一个有影响力的区域。
Investigation into Critical Gut Microbes Influencing Intramuscular Fat Deposition in Min Pigs.
To determine the pivotal microorganisms affecting intramuscular fat (IMF) accumulation in Min pigs and to discern the extent of the influence exerted by various intestinal segments on IMF-related traits, we sequenced 16S rRNA from the contents of six intestinal segments from a high IMF group (Group H) and a low IMF group (Group L) of Min pigs weighing 90 ± 1 kg. We then compared their diversity and disparities in bacterial genera. Group H exhibited considerably higher α diversity in the jejunum and colon than Group L (p < 0.05). When 95% confidence levels were considered, the main β diversity components for the ileum, caecum, and colon within Groups H and L exhibited absolute segregation. Accordingly, 31 differentially abundant genera across Group H were pinpointed via LEfSe and the Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05) and subsequently scrutinised based on their distribution and abundance across distinct intestinal segments and their correlation with IMF phenotypes. The abundances of Terrisporobacter, Acetitomaculum, Bacteroides, Fibrobacter, Treponema, Akkermansia, Blautia, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Turicibacter, Subdoligranulum, the [Eubacterium] siraeum group, and dgA 11 gut groups were positively correlated with IMF content (p < 0.05), whereas those of Bacillus, the Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 group, Streptococcus, Roseburia, Solobacterium, Veillonella, Lactobacillus, the Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group, Anaerovibrio, and the Lachnospiraceae AC2044 group were negatively associated with IMF content (p < 0.05). Employing PICRUSt2 for predicting intergenic metabolic pathways that differ among intestinal microbial communities revealed that within the 95% confidence interval the colonic microbiome was enriched with the most metabolic pathways, including those related to lipid metabolism. The diversity results, bacterial genus distributions, and metabolic pathway disparities revealed the colonic segment as an influential region for IMF deposition.
AnimalsAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3015
审稿时长
20.52 days
期刊介绍:
Animals (ISSN 2076-2615) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves animals, including zoology, ethnozoology, animal science, animal ethics and animal welfare. However, preference will be given to those articles that provide an understanding of animals within a larger context (i.e., the animals'' interactions with the outside world, including humans). There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental details and/or method of study, must be provided for research articles. Articles submitted that involve subjecting animals to unnecessary pain or suffering will not be accepted, and all articles must be submitted with the necessary ethical approval (please refer to the Ethical Guidelines for more information).