Alaa Ilayan, Dakota Dustin, Corina Kowalski, Martha A Belury, LuAnn K Johnson, Zach Conrad
{"title":"摄入限制碳水化合物饮食的成年人中，微量营养素不足情况因脂肪摄入量和类别而异：2007-2018年全国健康与营养调查。","authors":"Alaa Ilayan, Dakota Dustin, Corina Kowalski, Martha A Belury, LuAnn K Johnson, Zach Conrad","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Restricted carbohydrate diets remain among the most popular for weight loss and general health improvement. Recent evidence demonstrates that carbohydrate restricted diets are low in overall diet quality, yet their association with micronutrient inadequacy has not been well characterized at a population-level in adults in the United States.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>1) To evaluate the prevalence of not meeting daily micronutrient recommendations in US adults that met the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges (AMDRs) and those who restricted carbohydrate to <45% energy, and 2) examine the effect of total fat and fat class on these results for the restricted carbohydrate group.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study utilized 24-hour recall data on food and nutrient intake from respondents in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2018.</p><p><strong>Participants/setting: </strong>This study included 15,029 respondents who were ≥20 y, had complete and reliable nutrient intake data, and were not pregnant or breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The main outcome was the prevalence of not meeting daily micronutrient recommendations based on Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs).</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses performed: </strong>The National Cancer Institute's usual intake methodology was used to estimate usual dietary intake and the prevalence of the US adult population not meeting the DRIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to participants that met the AMDRs, those that consumed restricted carbohydrate diets had greater prevalence of inadequacy (% <Estimated Average Requirement) for vitamin A (46.7% vs 33.6%), folate (12.9% vs 4.3%), vitamin C (42.5% vs 23.3%), vitamin D (64.6% vs 61.3%), magnesium (45.2% vs 41.3%), and iron (3.0% vs 1.3%), and lower prevalence of inadequacy for zinc (8.1% vs 12.2%) and vitamins B-12 (1.7% vs 2.8%; P<0.05 for all comparisons). Restricted carbohydrate diet consumers had a lower likelihood of exceeding the Adequate Intake (AI) for vitamin K (57.8% vs 67.6%) and potassium (32.1% vs 39.2%; P<0.001 for both), higher likelihood of exceeding the AI for choline (16.9% vs 5.6%, P<0.001), and a greater proportion exceeded the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction Intake (CDRR) for sodium (92.1 vs 88.5%, P<0.001). Fat amount and class in those consuming restricted carbohydrate diets modified many of these associations, but the effects were heterogenous across micronutrients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that there are different types of restricted carbohydrate diets that can be characterized by fat amount and class, each with their own association with micronutrient intake. This information can be used by clinicians to provide more targeted dietary counseling to their patients who restrict carbohydrates, depending on the amount and type of fat they consume.</p>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Micronutrient inadequacy differs by intake of fat amount and class among adults that consume a restricted carbohydrate diet: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2018.\",\"authors\":\"Alaa Ilayan, Dakota Dustin, Corina Kowalski, Martha A Belury, LuAnn K Johnson, Zach Conrad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jand.2024.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Restricted carbohydrate diets remain among the most popular for weight loss and general health improvement. Recent evidence demonstrates that carbohydrate restricted diets are low in overall diet quality, yet their association with micronutrient inadequacy has not been well characterized at a population-level in adults in the United States.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>1) To evaluate the prevalence of not meeting daily micronutrient recommendations in US adults that met the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges (AMDRs) and those who restricted carbohydrate to <45% energy, and 2) examine the effect of total fat and fat class on these results for the restricted carbohydrate group.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study utilized 24-hour recall data on food and nutrient intake from respondents in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2018.</p><p><strong>Participants/setting: </strong>This study included 15,029 respondents who were ≥20 y, had complete and reliable nutrient intake data, and were not pregnant or breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The main outcome was the prevalence of not meeting daily micronutrient recommendations based on Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs).</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses performed: </strong>The National Cancer Institute's usual intake methodology was used to estimate usual dietary intake and the prevalence of the US adult population not meeting the DRIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to participants that met the AMDRs, those that consumed restricted carbohydrate diets had greater prevalence of inadequacy (% <Estimated Average Requirement) for vitamin A (46.7% vs 33.6%), folate (12.9% vs 4.3%), vitamin C (42.5% vs 23.3%), vitamin D (64.6% vs 61.3%), magnesium (45.2% vs 41.3%), and iron (3.0% vs 1.3%), and lower prevalence of inadequacy for zinc (8.1% vs 12.2%) and vitamins B-12 (1.7% vs 2.8%; P<0.05 for all comparisons). Restricted carbohydrate diet consumers had a lower likelihood of exceeding the Adequate Intake (AI) for vitamin K (57.8% vs 67.6%) and potassium (32.1% vs 39.2%; P<0.001 for both), higher likelihood of exceeding the AI for choline (16.9% vs 5.6%, P<0.001), and a greater proportion exceeded the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction Intake (CDRR) for sodium (92.1 vs 88.5%, P<0.001). Fat amount and class in those consuming restricted carbohydrate diets modified many of these associations, but the effects were heterogenous across micronutrients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that there are different types of restricted carbohydrate diets that can be characterized by fat amount and class, each with their own association with micronutrient intake. This information can be used by clinicians to provide more targeted dietary counseling to their patients who restrict carbohydrates, depending on the amount and type of fat they consume.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2024.11.001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2024.11.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Micronutrient inadequacy differs by intake of fat amount and class among adults that consume a restricted carbohydrate diet: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2018.
Background: Restricted carbohydrate diets remain among the most popular for weight loss and general health improvement. Recent evidence demonstrates that carbohydrate restricted diets are low in overall diet quality, yet their association with micronutrient inadequacy has not been well characterized at a population-level in adults in the United States.
Objective: 1) To evaluate the prevalence of not meeting daily micronutrient recommendations in US adults that met the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges (AMDRs) and those who restricted carbohydrate to <45% energy, and 2) examine the effect of total fat and fat class on these results for the restricted carbohydrate group.
Design: This study utilized 24-hour recall data on food and nutrient intake from respondents in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2018.
Participants/setting: This study included 15,029 respondents who were ≥20 y, had complete and reliable nutrient intake data, and were not pregnant or breastfeeding.
Main outcome measures: The main outcome was the prevalence of not meeting daily micronutrient recommendations based on Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs).
Statistical analyses performed: The National Cancer Institute's usual intake methodology was used to estimate usual dietary intake and the prevalence of the US adult population not meeting the DRIs.
Results: Compared to participants that met the AMDRs, those that consumed restricted carbohydrate diets had greater prevalence of inadequacy (%
Conclusion: This study shows that there are different types of restricted carbohydrate diets that can be characterized by fat amount and class, each with their own association with micronutrient intake. This information can be used by clinicians to provide more targeted dietary counseling to their patients who restrict carbohydrates, depending on the amount and type of fat they consume.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
