肝移植中的维持性免疫抑制疗法:意大利回顾性队列研究 CESIT 的结果。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087373
Arianna Bellini, Marco Finocchietti, Alessandro Cesare Rosa, Lucia Masiero, Silvia Trapani, Massimo Cardillo, Marco Massari, Stefania Spila Alegiani, Silvia Pierobon, Eliana Ferroni, Martina Zanforlini, Olivia Leoni, Stefano Ledda, Donatella Garau, Marina Davoli, Antonio Addis, Valeria Belleudi
{"title":"肝移植中的维持性免疫抑制疗法:意大利回顾性队列研究 CESIT 的结果。","authors":"Arianna Bellini, Marco Finocchietti, Alessandro Cesare Rosa, Lucia Masiero, Silvia Trapani, Massimo Cardillo, Marco Massari, Stefania Spila Alegiani, Silvia Pierobon, Eliana Ferroni, Martina Zanforlini, Olivia Leoni, Stefano Ledda, Donatella Garau, Marina Davoli, Antonio Addis, Valeria Belleudi","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the use of maintenance immunosuppressive treatments following liver transplantation and to compare their risk-benefit profiles in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective multicentrer cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four Italian regions (Lombardy, Veneto, Lazio, Sardinia).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were integrated from the national transplant information system and administrative claims data from four Italian regions. All adults who underwent incident liver transplantation between 2009 and 2019 were identified and categorised into two groups: cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The trend of immunosuppressive treatment over years was analysed, and their effectiveness/safety profiles were compared using multivariate Cox models (HR; 95% CI).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Mortality, transplant reject/graft failure, incidence of severe infections, cancer, diabetes, major adverse cardiovascular events and lipid-modifying agents use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 750 subjects in the cirrhosis cohort and 1159 in the HCC cohort. Over the study years, there was a decline in the use of cyclosporine-CsA, while combination therapy involving tacrolimus with other drugs increased compared with monotherapy. Overall, tacrolimus monotherapy use was slightly over 40% in both groups, followed by tacrolimus+mycophenolate (39.5%-cirrhosis; 30.6%-HCC) and tacrolimus+molecular target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) (8.5%-cirrhosis; 13.3%-HCC). No significant differences emerged in risk-benefit profile of different tacrolimus-based therapies, except for a higher risk of mortality in cirrhosis subjects under tacrolimus monotherapy compared with tacrolimus+mycophenolate (HR: 2.07; 1.17 to 3.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights a shift over time in postliver transplant therapeutic patterns, favouring the use of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate or mTORi, rather than monotherapy. Moreover, a potential association between tacrolimus monotherapy and increased mortality in the cirrhosis cohort was identified. Further research is warranted to investigate these findings more deeply and to optimise treatment strategies for liver transplant recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplantation: results from CESIT study, an Italian retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Arianna Bellini, Marco Finocchietti, Alessandro Cesare Rosa, Lucia Masiero, Silvia Trapani, Massimo Cardillo, Marco Massari, Stefania Spila Alegiani, Silvia Pierobon, Eliana Ferroni, Martina Zanforlini, Olivia Leoni, Stefano Ledda, Donatella Garau, Marina Davoli, Antonio Addis, Valeria Belleudi\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the use of maintenance immunosuppressive treatments following liver transplantation and to compare their risk-benefit profiles in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective multicentrer cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four Italian regions (Lombardy, Veneto, Lazio, Sardinia).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were integrated from the national transplant information system and administrative claims data from four Italian regions. All adults who underwent incident liver transplantation between 2009 and 2019 were identified and categorised into two groups: cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The trend of immunosuppressive treatment over years was analysed, and their effectiveness/safety profiles were compared using multivariate Cox models (HR; 95% CI).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Mortality, transplant reject/graft failure, incidence of severe infections, cancer, diabetes, major adverse cardiovascular events and lipid-modifying agents use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 750 subjects in the cirrhosis cohort and 1159 in the HCC cohort. Over the study years, there was a decline in the use of cyclosporine-CsA, while combination therapy involving tacrolimus with other drugs increased compared with monotherapy. Overall, tacrolimus monotherapy use was slightly over 40% in both groups, followed by tacrolimus+mycophenolate (39.5%-cirrhosis; 30.6%-HCC) and tacrolimus+molecular target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) (8.5%-cirrhosis; 13.3%-HCC). No significant differences emerged in risk-benefit profile of different tacrolimus-based therapies, except for a higher risk of mortality in cirrhosis subjects under tacrolimus monotherapy compared with tacrolimus+mycophenolate (HR: 2.07; 1.17 to 3.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights a shift over time in postliver transplant therapeutic patterns, favouring the use of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate or mTORi, rather than monotherapy. Moreover, a potential association between tacrolimus monotherapy and increased mortality in the cirrhosis cohort was identified. Further research is warranted to investigate these findings more deeply and to optimise treatment strategies for liver transplant recipients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087373\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的调查肝移植术后维持性免疫抑制治疗的使用情况,并比较其在临床实践中的风险-效益情况:设计:回顾性多中心队列研究:地点:意大利四个大区(伦巴第大区、威尼托大区、拉齐奥大区、撒丁岛大区):方法:从国家移植信息系统和意大利四个大区的行政报销数据中整合数据。2009年至2019年期间,所有接受过肝移植手术的成年人都被识别出来,并被分为两组:肝硬化或肝细胞癌(HCC)。使用多变量考克斯模型(HR;95% CI)分析了多年来免疫抑制治疗的趋势,并对其有效性/安全性进行了比较:主要结果指标:死亡率、移植排斥/移植物失败、严重感染发生率、癌症、糖尿病、主要不良心血管事件和调脂药物的使用:研究包括肝硬化队列中的 750 名受试者和 HCC 队列中的 1159 名受试者。在研究期间,环孢素-CsA的使用率有所下降,而他克莫司与其他药物的联合疗法与单一疗法相比有所增加。总体而言,两组中使用他克莫司单药治疗的比例均略高于 40%,其次是他克莫司+霉酚酸酯(39.5%-肝硬化;30.6%-肝癌)和他克莫司+雷帕霉素分子靶点抑制剂(mTORi)(8.5%-肝硬化;13.3%-肝癌)。基于他克莫司的不同疗法在风险-效益方面无明显差异,只是与他克莫司+霉酚酸盐相比,接受他克莫司单药治疗的肝硬化患者的死亡风险更高(HR:2.07;1.17-3.65):该研究强调了肝移植后治疗模式随着时间的推移而发生的变化,即倾向于他克莫司与霉酚酸酯或mTORi联合使用,而非单药治疗。此外,研究还发现他克莫司单药治疗与肝硬化队列中死亡率升高之间存在潜在关联。为了更深入地研究这些发现并优化肝移植受者的治疗策略,有必要开展进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplantation: results from CESIT study, an Italian retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: To investigate the use of maintenance immunosuppressive treatments following liver transplantation and to compare their risk-benefit profiles in clinical practice.

Design: Retrospective multicentrer cohort study.

Setting: Four Italian regions (Lombardy, Veneto, Lazio, Sardinia).

Methods: Data were integrated from the national transplant information system and administrative claims data from four Italian regions. All adults who underwent incident liver transplantation between 2009 and 2019 were identified and categorised into two groups: cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The trend of immunosuppressive treatment over years was analysed, and their effectiveness/safety profiles were compared using multivariate Cox models (HR; 95% CI).

Main outcome measures: Mortality, transplant reject/graft failure, incidence of severe infections, cancer, diabetes, major adverse cardiovascular events and lipid-modifying agents use.

Results: The study comprised 750 subjects in the cirrhosis cohort and 1159 in the HCC cohort. Over the study years, there was a decline in the use of cyclosporine-CsA, while combination therapy involving tacrolimus with other drugs increased compared with monotherapy. Overall, tacrolimus monotherapy use was slightly over 40% in both groups, followed by tacrolimus+mycophenolate (39.5%-cirrhosis; 30.6%-HCC) and tacrolimus+molecular target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) (8.5%-cirrhosis; 13.3%-HCC). No significant differences emerged in risk-benefit profile of different tacrolimus-based therapies, except for a higher risk of mortality in cirrhosis subjects under tacrolimus monotherapy compared with tacrolimus+mycophenolate (HR: 2.07; 1.17 to 3.65).

Conclusions: The study highlights a shift over time in postliver transplant therapeutic patterns, favouring the use of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate or mTORi, rather than monotherapy. Moreover, a potential association between tacrolimus monotherapy and increased mortality in the cirrhosis cohort was identified. Further research is warranted to investigate these findings more deeply and to optimise treatment strategies for liver transplant recipients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Pain during prolonged sitting in subjects with patellofemoral pain in Dutch physical therapy clinics: an online questionnaire-based analysis. Post-COVID in healthcare workers and its consequences on quality of life, activities, participation, need for rehabilitation and care experiences: protocol of a cohort study. Association between life satisfaction and health behaviours among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Determinants of inpatient satisfaction and hospital recommendation: experiences from a cross-sectional study of a tertiary general hospital in China. Development and validation of a clinical prediction tool to estimate survival in community-dwelling adults living with dementia: a protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1