研究方案:"内窥镜 CRC "队列是一项前瞻性生物库研究,旨在开发和评估结直肠癌和癌前病变的诊断和预后生物标志物图谱。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083229
Hao Ran Cheng, Robert van Vorstenbosch, Daisy Jonkers, Adrian Masclee, Erik Schoon, Frederik J van Schooten, Agnieszka Smolinska, Zlatan Mujagic
{"title":"研究方案:\"内窥镜 CRC \"队列是一项前瞻性生物库研究,旨在开发和评估结直肠癌和癌前病变的诊断和预后生物标志物图谱。","authors":"Hao Ran Cheng, Robert van Vorstenbosch, Daisy Jonkers, Adrian Masclee, Erik Schoon, Frederik J van Schooten, Agnieszka Smolinska, Zlatan Mujagic","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and clinically relevant (advanced) adenomas leads to a significant reduction of CRC-related mortality and morbidity. However, the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) suffers from a high number of false-positive results and is insensitive to detecting advanced adenomas, resulting in false-negative results for these premalignant lesions. Therefore, more accurate, non-invasive screening tools are needed for the detection and prognostication of colorectal neoplasia. Previous research on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) analysis in breath and faeces has shown to be promising potential biomarkers for this purpose. Several VOC-sampling methods, including breath sampling, have improved significantly over the recent years resulting in an increased reliability of measurements. Therefore, we aim to identify relevant VOC profiles in exhaled breath and faeces for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia while taking into account relevant confounding factors. Follow-up data will be used to identify relevant VOC profiles in exhaled breath and faeces for the prognostication of colorectal neoplasia. Finally, a biobank will be set up for future research questions on this topic.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Subjects with positive FIT within the Dutch national CRC cancer screening programme are included. Subjects are asked to fill in questionnaires and exhaled breath, faeces and blood are sampled prior to colonoscopy. All subjects are asked to fill in follow-up questionnaires at years 1 and 5 of the study. In case of surveillance colonoscopies, subjects are asked to provide exhaled breath, faeces and blood prior to the colonoscopy again. Breath sampling is performed using the ReCIVA breath sampler. VOCs in breath and faeces are analysed using gas-chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Raw GC-MS data is preprocessed and analysed using machine learning techniques.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The study is approved by the medical ethics committee at the Maastricht University Medical Center (NL74844.068.20) in November 2021 and started inclusion in January 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study protocol: the 'Endoscope CRC' cohort, a prospective biobank study on the development and evaluation of diagnostic and prognostic biomarker profiles for colorectal cancer and premalignant lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Hao Ran Cheng, Robert van Vorstenbosch, Daisy Jonkers, Adrian Masclee, Erik Schoon, Frederik J van Schooten, Agnieszka Smolinska, Zlatan Mujagic\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and clinically relevant (advanced) adenomas leads to a significant reduction of CRC-related mortality and morbidity. However, the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) suffers from a high number of false-positive results and is insensitive to detecting advanced adenomas, resulting in false-negative results for these premalignant lesions. Therefore, more accurate, non-invasive screening tools are needed for the detection and prognostication of colorectal neoplasia. Previous research on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) analysis in breath and faeces has shown to be promising potential biomarkers for this purpose. Several VOC-sampling methods, including breath sampling, have improved significantly over the recent years resulting in an increased reliability of measurements. Therefore, we aim to identify relevant VOC profiles in exhaled breath and faeces for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia while taking into account relevant confounding factors. Follow-up data will be used to identify relevant VOC profiles in exhaled breath and faeces for the prognostication of colorectal neoplasia. Finally, a biobank will be set up for future research questions on this topic.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Subjects with positive FIT within the Dutch national CRC cancer screening programme are included. Subjects are asked to fill in questionnaires and exhaled breath, faeces and blood are sampled prior to colonoscopy. All subjects are asked to fill in follow-up questionnaires at years 1 and 5 of the study. In case of surveillance colonoscopies, subjects are asked to provide exhaled breath, faeces and blood prior to the colonoscopy again. Breath sampling is performed using the ReCIVA breath sampler. VOCs in breath and faeces are analysed using gas-chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Raw GC-MS data is preprocessed and analysed using machine learning techniques.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The study is approved by the medical ethics committee at the Maastricht University Medical Center (NL74844.068.20) in November 2021 and started inclusion in January 2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083229\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083229","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:早期发现结肠直肠癌(CRC)和临床相关(晚期)腺瘤可显著降低与 CRC 相关的死亡率和发病率。然而,粪便免疫化学检验(FIT)的假阳性结果较多,而且对晚期腺瘤的检测不敏感,导致这些恶变前病变的假阴性结果。因此,需要更准确、无创的筛查工具来检测和预后结直肠肿瘤。此前对呼气和粪便中挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)分析的研究表明,VOCs 是一种很有前景的潜在生物标记物。近年来,包括呼气采样在内的几种挥发性有机化合物采样方法有了显著改进,从而提高了测量的可靠性。因此,我们的目标是在考虑到相关混杂因素的情况下,确定呼出气体和粪便中用于诊断结直肠肿瘤的相关挥发性有机化合物特征。后续数据将用于确定呼出气体和粪便中的相关挥发性有机化合物特征,以用于结直肠肿瘤的预后。最后,还将建立一个生物库,用于解决未来有关该主题的研究问题:方法与分析:纳入荷兰全国性 CRC 癌症筛查计划中 FIT 呈阳性的受试者。受试者需填写调查问卷,并在结肠镜检查前进行呼气、粪便和血液采样。所有受试者都要在研究的第 1 年和第 5 年填写随访问卷。如果受试者接受了结肠镜监测检查,则需要在结肠镜检查前再次提供呼出的气体、粪便和血液样本。呼气采样使用 ReCIVA 呼气采样器进行。呼气和粪便中的挥发性有机化合物采用气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)进行分析。GC-MS 原始数据经过预处理,并使用机器学习技术进行分析:该研究于 2021 年 11 月获得马斯特里赫特大学医学中心医学伦理委员会的批准(NL74844.068.20),并于 2022 年 1 月开始纳入研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study protocol: the 'Endoscope CRC' cohort, a prospective biobank study on the development and evaluation of diagnostic and prognostic biomarker profiles for colorectal cancer and premalignant lesions.

Introduction: Early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and clinically relevant (advanced) adenomas leads to a significant reduction of CRC-related mortality and morbidity. However, the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) suffers from a high number of false-positive results and is insensitive to detecting advanced adenomas, resulting in false-negative results for these premalignant lesions. Therefore, more accurate, non-invasive screening tools are needed for the detection and prognostication of colorectal neoplasia. Previous research on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) analysis in breath and faeces has shown to be promising potential biomarkers for this purpose. Several VOC-sampling methods, including breath sampling, have improved significantly over the recent years resulting in an increased reliability of measurements. Therefore, we aim to identify relevant VOC profiles in exhaled breath and faeces for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia while taking into account relevant confounding factors. Follow-up data will be used to identify relevant VOC profiles in exhaled breath and faeces for the prognostication of colorectal neoplasia. Finally, a biobank will be set up for future research questions on this topic.

Methods and analysis: Subjects with positive FIT within the Dutch national CRC cancer screening programme are included. Subjects are asked to fill in questionnaires and exhaled breath, faeces and blood are sampled prior to colonoscopy. All subjects are asked to fill in follow-up questionnaires at years 1 and 5 of the study. In case of surveillance colonoscopies, subjects are asked to provide exhaled breath, faeces and blood prior to the colonoscopy again. Breath sampling is performed using the ReCIVA breath sampler. VOCs in breath and faeces are analysed using gas-chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Raw GC-MS data is preprocessed and analysed using machine learning techniques.

Ethics and dissemination: The study is approved by the medical ethics committee at the Maastricht University Medical Center (NL74844.068.20) in November 2021 and started inclusion in January 2022.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Pain during prolonged sitting in subjects with patellofemoral pain in Dutch physical therapy clinics: an online questionnaire-based analysis. Post-COVID in healthcare workers and its consequences on quality of life, activities, participation, need for rehabilitation and care experiences: protocol of a cohort study. Association between life satisfaction and health behaviours among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Determinants of inpatient satisfaction and hospital recommendation: experiences from a cross-sectional study of a tertiary general hospital in China. Development and validation of a clinical prediction tool to estimate survival in community-dwelling adults living with dementia: a protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1