狗活动追踪器对主人散步的影响:一项基于社区的随机对照试验。

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES BMC Research Notes Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1186/s13104-024-06989-0
Matthew N Ahmadi, Raaj Kishore Biswas, Lauren Powell, Adrian Bauman, Cathie Sherrington, Anthony Podberscek, Paul McGreevy, Ryan E Rhodes, Emmanuel Stamatakis
{"title":"狗活动追踪器对主人散步的影响:一项基于社区的随机对照试验。","authors":"Matthew N Ahmadi, Raaj Kishore Biswas, Lauren Powell, Adrian Bauman, Cathie Sherrington, Anthony Podberscek, Paul McGreevy, Ryan E Rhodes, Emmanuel Stamatakis","doi":"10.1186/s13104-024-06989-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A promising strategy to increase population physical activity is through promotion of dog walking. Informed by multi-process action control and nascent dog-walking theory, we examined the effectiveness of a 3-month technology-based (dog tracker) 2-arm randomised controlled dog-walking intervention to increase dog-owner daily physical activity in the general community in Sydney, Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>37 participants were allocated to the intervention group (mean age = 43.2 [SD 11.9]) and 40 to the control group (mean age = 42.3 [SD 11.9]). Both groups averaged more than 10,500 steps/day at baseline. There was no evidence of within- or between-group physical activity differences across timepoints. The results remained consistent after exclusion of participants who had data collected during COVID-19 lockdowns. Compared with baseline, both groups had significant increases in sedentary time during the post-intervention, and 6 month follow-up. The absence of significant differences between-group physical activity differences may be attributable to the ceiling effect of both groups already being sufficiently active. These results provide useful guidance to future studies intended to assess the efficacy of technology-based dog-walking interventions. Future dog-walking interventions should specifically target physically inactive dog owners.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ACTRN12619001391167 (10/10/2019); Retrospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"17 1","pages":"339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a dog activity tracker on owners' walking: a community-based randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew N Ahmadi, Raaj Kishore Biswas, Lauren Powell, Adrian Bauman, Cathie Sherrington, Anthony Podberscek, Paul McGreevy, Ryan E Rhodes, Emmanuel Stamatakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13104-024-06989-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A promising strategy to increase population physical activity is through promotion of dog walking. Informed by multi-process action control and nascent dog-walking theory, we examined the effectiveness of a 3-month technology-based (dog tracker) 2-arm randomised controlled dog-walking intervention to increase dog-owner daily physical activity in the general community in Sydney, Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>37 participants were allocated to the intervention group (mean age = 43.2 [SD 11.9]) and 40 to the control group (mean age = 42.3 [SD 11.9]). Both groups averaged more than 10,500 steps/day at baseline. There was no evidence of within- or between-group physical activity differences across timepoints. The results remained consistent after exclusion of participants who had data collected during COVID-19 lockdowns. Compared with baseline, both groups had significant increases in sedentary time during the post-intervention, and 6 month follow-up. The absence of significant differences between-group physical activity differences may be attributable to the ceiling effect of both groups already being sufficiently active. These results provide useful guidance to future studies intended to assess the efficacy of technology-based dog-walking interventions. Future dog-walking interventions should specifically target physically inactive dog owners.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ACTRN12619001391167 (10/10/2019); Retrospectively registered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566059/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06989-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06989-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:促进遛狗是增加居民体育锻炼的一项有前途的策略。在多过程行动控制和新兴遛狗理论的指导下,我们研究了为期 3 个月的基于技术(狗追踪器)的双臂随机对照遛狗干预的有效性,以增加澳大利亚悉尼普通社区养狗人的日常体育活动:37 名参与者被分配到干预组(平均年龄 = 43.2 [SD 11.9]),40 名参与者被分配到对照组(平均年龄 = 42.3 [SD 11.9])。两组的基线平均步数均超过 10,500 步/天。在各时间点上,没有证据表明组内或组间的体力活动存在差异。在排除 COVID-19 封锁期间收集数据的参与者后,结果仍然一致。与基线相比,两组在干预后和 6 个月随访期间的久坐时间都有显著增加。组间体力活动差异不明显的原因可能是两组参与者的体力活动已经足够活跃,从而产生了天花板效应。这些结果为今后旨在评估基于技术的遛狗干预效果的研究提供了有益的指导。未来的遛狗干预措施应特别针对不爱运动的狗主人:ACTRN12619001391167 (10/10/2019); 追溯注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of a dog activity tracker on owners' walking: a community-based randomised controlled trial.

Objective: A promising strategy to increase population physical activity is through promotion of dog walking. Informed by multi-process action control and nascent dog-walking theory, we examined the effectiveness of a 3-month technology-based (dog tracker) 2-arm randomised controlled dog-walking intervention to increase dog-owner daily physical activity in the general community in Sydney, Australia.

Results: 37 participants were allocated to the intervention group (mean age = 43.2 [SD 11.9]) and 40 to the control group (mean age = 42.3 [SD 11.9]). Both groups averaged more than 10,500 steps/day at baseline. There was no evidence of within- or between-group physical activity differences across timepoints. The results remained consistent after exclusion of participants who had data collected during COVID-19 lockdowns. Compared with baseline, both groups had significant increases in sedentary time during the post-intervention, and 6 month follow-up. The absence of significant differences between-group physical activity differences may be attributable to the ceiling effect of both groups already being sufficiently active. These results provide useful guidance to future studies intended to assess the efficacy of technology-based dog-walking interventions. Future dog-walking interventions should specifically target physically inactive dog owners.

Trial registration: ACTRN12619001391167 (10/10/2019); Retrospectively registered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
期刊最新文献
Open challenges for the automatic synthesis of clinical trials. Profile of outer membrane proteins of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli in Ghana. The association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and sperm quality parameters: a cross-sectional study. Feasibility of enzalutamide on patients with recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with marker tumors: phase I study. Assessment of smartphone-based active distraction in association with audioanalgesia for overcoming airotor-related anxiety in children: a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1