黑孜然油生产不同阶段的抗氧化潜力评估

IF 4.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Foods Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.3390/foods13213518
Dobrochna Rabiej-Kozioł, Aleksandra Szydłowska-Czerniak
{"title":"黑孜然油生产不同阶段的抗氧化潜力评估","authors":"Dobrochna Rabiej-Kozioł, Aleksandra Szydłowska-Czerniak","doi":"10.3390/foods13213518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Nigella sativa</i> L. seeds and their industrial process products, oils, cake, and meal, are valuable sources of bioactive compounds with antioxidant properties. In this work, the effect of technological processes on the antioxidant capacity (AC) and total phenolic content (TPC) in the black cumin oils obtained by cold pressing and solvent extraction, as well as the by-products, were evaluated. The AC values of black cumin seeds (BCS), cold-pressed black cumin oil (BCCPO), black cumin oil extracted from seeds (BCEO-S), black cumin oil extracted from cake (BCEO-C), black cumin cake (BCC), and black cumin meal (BCM) were determined by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) assays, whereas TPC in these samples was analyzed by the Folin-Ciocalteu (FC) method. Two applied conventional oil extraction methods, screw pressing and solvent extraction, significantly affected the AC and TPC in the obtained black cumin oils and by-products. The solvent-extracted black cumin oils revealed higher antioxidant properties (DPPH = 4041-16,500 μmol TE/100 g, CUPRAC = 1275-4827 μmol TE/100 g) than the cold-pressed black cumin oil (DPPH = 3451 μmol TE/100 g and CUPRAC = 3475 μmol TE/100 g). In addition, the oil yield (20.92-48.86%) and antioxidant properties of BCCPO (DPPH = 2933-5894 μmol TE/100 g and TPC = 135-199 mg GAE/100 g) and BCC (DPPH = 1890-2265 μmol TE/100 g and TPC = 284-341 mg GAE/100 g) closely depended on the nozzle diameters (5, 8, and 10 mm) mounted in a screw press. Although both by-products were a rich source of antioxidants, BCM had significantly lower CUPRAC (1514 μmol TE/100 g) and TPC (92 mg GAE/100 g) values than BCC (CUPRAC = 3397 μmol TE/100 g and TPC = 426 mg GAE/100 g). Nevertheless, acid hydrolysis and alkaline hydrolysis of BCM extracts significantly increased their antioxidant potential. However, the DPPH (35,629 μmol TE/100 g), CUPRAC (12,601 μmol TE/100 g), and TPC (691 mg GAE/100 g) results were higher for the BCM extract after acid hydrolysis than those for alkaline hydrolysate (DPPH = 2539 μmol TE/100 g, CUPRAC = 5959 μmol TE/100 g, and TPC = 613 mg GAE/100 g). Finally, the generated AGREEprep metrics highlighted the sustainability and the greenness of the cold pressing of oil from BCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12386,"journal":{"name":"Foods","volume":"13 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544958/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antioxidant Potential Evaluation at Various Stages of Black Cumin Oil Production.\",\"authors\":\"Dobrochna Rabiej-Kozioł, Aleksandra Szydłowska-Czerniak\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/foods13213518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Nigella sativa</i> L. seeds and their industrial process products, oils, cake, and meal, are valuable sources of bioactive compounds with antioxidant properties. In this work, the effect of technological processes on the antioxidant capacity (AC) and total phenolic content (TPC) in the black cumin oils obtained by cold pressing and solvent extraction, as well as the by-products, were evaluated. The AC values of black cumin seeds (BCS), cold-pressed black cumin oil (BCCPO), black cumin oil extracted from seeds (BCEO-S), black cumin oil extracted from cake (BCEO-C), black cumin cake (BCC), and black cumin meal (BCM) were determined by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) assays, whereas TPC in these samples was analyzed by the Folin-Ciocalteu (FC) method. Two applied conventional oil extraction methods, screw pressing and solvent extraction, significantly affected the AC and TPC in the obtained black cumin oils and by-products. The solvent-extracted black cumin oils revealed higher antioxidant properties (DPPH = 4041-16,500 μmol TE/100 g, CUPRAC = 1275-4827 μmol TE/100 g) than the cold-pressed black cumin oil (DPPH = 3451 μmol TE/100 g and CUPRAC = 3475 μmol TE/100 g). In addition, the oil yield (20.92-48.86%) and antioxidant properties of BCCPO (DPPH = 2933-5894 μmol TE/100 g and TPC = 135-199 mg GAE/100 g) and BCC (DPPH = 1890-2265 μmol TE/100 g and TPC = 284-341 mg GAE/100 g) closely depended on the nozzle diameters (5, 8, and 10 mm) mounted in a screw press. Although both by-products were a rich source of antioxidants, BCM had significantly lower CUPRAC (1514 μmol TE/100 g) and TPC (92 mg GAE/100 g) values than BCC (CUPRAC = 3397 μmol TE/100 g and TPC = 426 mg GAE/100 g). Nevertheless, acid hydrolysis and alkaline hydrolysis of BCM extracts significantly increased their antioxidant potential. However, the DPPH (35,629 μmol TE/100 g), CUPRAC (12,601 μmol TE/100 g), and TPC (691 mg GAE/100 g) results were higher for the BCM extract after acid hydrolysis than those for alkaline hydrolysate (DPPH = 2539 μmol TE/100 g, CUPRAC = 5959 μmol TE/100 g, and TPC = 613 mg GAE/100 g). Finally, the generated AGREEprep metrics highlighted the sustainability and the greenness of the cold pressing of oil from BCS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foods\",\"volume\":\"13 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544958/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13213518\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13213518","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黑小茴香(Nigella sativa L.)种子及其工业加工产品(油、饼和粕)是具有抗氧化特性的生物活性化合物的宝贵来源。在这项工作中,研究人员评估了技术工艺对通过冷榨和溶剂萃取获得的黑孜然油以及副产品中抗氧化能力(AC)和总酚含量(TPC)的影响。黑孜然籽(BCS)、冷榨黑孜然油(BCPO)、从籽中提取的黑孜然油(BCEO-S)、从饼中提取的黑孜然油(BCEO-C)、黑孜然饼(BCC)和黑孜然粉(BCM)的抗氧化能力(AC)和总酚含量(TPC)均达到了标准值、采用 2,2-二苯基-1-苦基肼(DPPH)和铜还原抗氧化能力(CUPRAC)检测法测定黑孜然籽油(BCEO-S)、黑孜然饼油(BCEO-C)、黑孜然饼(BCC)和黑孜然粉(BCM)的抗氧化能力,而这些样品中的 TPC 则采用 Folin-Ciocalteu (FC)法分析。螺旋压榨和溶剂萃取这两种传统的榨油方法对所获得的黑孜然油和副产品中的 AC 和 TPC 有显著影响。与冷榨黑孜然油(DPPH = 3451 μmol TE/100 g 和 CUPRAC = 3475 μmol TE/100 g)相比,溶剂萃取黑孜然油具有更高的抗氧化性(DPPH = 4041-16,500 μmol TE/100 g 和 CUPRAC = 1275-4827 μmol TE/100 g)。此外,BCCPO(DPPH = 2933-5894 μmol TE/100 g,TPC = 135-199 mg GAE/100 g)和 BCC(DPPH = 1890-2265 μmol TE/100 g,TPC = 284-341 mg GAE/100 g)的出油率(20.92%-48.86%)和抗氧化特性与安装在螺旋榨油机中的喷嘴直径(5、8 和 10 毫米)密切相关。虽然两种副产品都是抗氧化剂的丰富来源,但 BCM 的 CUPRAC 值(1514 μmol TE/100 g)和 TPC 值(92 mg GAE/100 g)明显低于 BCC(CUPRAC = 3397 μmol TE/100 g 和 TPC = 426 mg GAE/100 g)。然而,BCM 提取物的酸水解和碱水解可显著提高其抗氧化潜力。然而,酸水解后 BCM 提取物的 DPPH(35629 μmol TE/100 g)、CUPRAC(12601 μmol TE/100 g)和 TPC(691 mg GAE/100 g)结果均高于碱水解物(DPPH = 2539 μmol TE/100 g、CUPRAC = 5959 μmol TE/100 g 和 TPC = 613 mg GAE/100 g)。最后,生成的 AGREEprep 指标强调了 BCS 冷榨油的可持续性和绿色性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antioxidant Potential Evaluation at Various Stages of Black Cumin Oil Production.

Nigella sativa L. seeds and their industrial process products, oils, cake, and meal, are valuable sources of bioactive compounds with antioxidant properties. In this work, the effect of technological processes on the antioxidant capacity (AC) and total phenolic content (TPC) in the black cumin oils obtained by cold pressing and solvent extraction, as well as the by-products, were evaluated. The AC values of black cumin seeds (BCS), cold-pressed black cumin oil (BCCPO), black cumin oil extracted from seeds (BCEO-S), black cumin oil extracted from cake (BCEO-C), black cumin cake (BCC), and black cumin meal (BCM) were determined by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) assays, whereas TPC in these samples was analyzed by the Folin-Ciocalteu (FC) method. Two applied conventional oil extraction methods, screw pressing and solvent extraction, significantly affected the AC and TPC in the obtained black cumin oils and by-products. The solvent-extracted black cumin oils revealed higher antioxidant properties (DPPH = 4041-16,500 μmol TE/100 g, CUPRAC = 1275-4827 μmol TE/100 g) than the cold-pressed black cumin oil (DPPH = 3451 μmol TE/100 g and CUPRAC = 3475 μmol TE/100 g). In addition, the oil yield (20.92-48.86%) and antioxidant properties of BCCPO (DPPH = 2933-5894 μmol TE/100 g and TPC = 135-199 mg GAE/100 g) and BCC (DPPH = 1890-2265 μmol TE/100 g and TPC = 284-341 mg GAE/100 g) closely depended on the nozzle diameters (5, 8, and 10 mm) mounted in a screw press. Although both by-products were a rich source of antioxidants, BCM had significantly lower CUPRAC (1514 μmol TE/100 g) and TPC (92 mg GAE/100 g) values than BCC (CUPRAC = 3397 μmol TE/100 g and TPC = 426 mg GAE/100 g). Nevertheless, acid hydrolysis and alkaline hydrolysis of BCM extracts significantly increased their antioxidant potential. However, the DPPH (35,629 μmol TE/100 g), CUPRAC (12,601 μmol TE/100 g), and TPC (691 mg GAE/100 g) results were higher for the BCM extract after acid hydrolysis than those for alkaline hydrolysate (DPPH = 2539 μmol TE/100 g, CUPRAC = 5959 μmol TE/100 g, and TPC = 613 mg GAE/100 g). Finally, the generated AGREEprep metrics highlighted the sustainability and the greenness of the cold pressing of oil from BCS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foods
Foods Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
3516
审稿时长
15.83 days
期刊介绍: Foods (ISSN 2304-8158) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of food research. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists, researchers, and other food professionals to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible or share their knowledge with as much readers unlimitedly as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal: Ÿ manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed Ÿ electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material Ÿ we also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds
期刊最新文献
Construction of Sensory Evaluation System of Purple Sweet Potato Rice Steamed Sponge Cake Based on Fuzzy Mathematics. Optimization of Ferimzone and Tricyclazole Analysis in Rice Straw Using QuEChERS Method and Its Application in UAV-Sprayed Residue Study. Nutrition, Flavor, and Microbial Communities of Two Traditional Bacterial Douchi from Gansu, China. Diversity Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of 101 Soybean (Glycine max L.) Germplasms Based on Sprout Quality Characteristics. Antioxidant Potential Evaluation at Various Stages of Black Cumin Oil Production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1