法医精神病样本中的抗精神病药物处方做法及其与再入院治疗的关系。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1474626
Joseph Goody, Karen Petersen, Johann Brink, Anne G Crocker, Tonia Nicholls
{"title":"法医精神病样本中的抗精神病药物处方做法及其与再入院治疗的关系。","authors":"Joseph Goody, Karen Petersen, Johann Brink, Anne G Crocker, Tonia Nicholls","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1474626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While there is extensive literature examining the effectiveness of antipsychotic prescribing to patients with schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorders in general psychiatric services, there is a dearth of studies examining antipsychotic prescribing practices and their effectiveness in forensic psychiatric services. Forensic psychiatric patients have unique challenges often due to their high-profile offences, public scrutiny, and legal requirements. This longitudinal, retrospective study aimed to examine antipsychotic prescribing and rehospitalization rates in a forensic psychiatric sample, along with relevant socio-demographic, clinical, and forensic characteristics. All patients had a psychotic illness and were prescribed antipsychotic medication. The sample included 153 patients, of which the majority were male (85.6%), Caucasian (71.2%), middle aged (30s to 50s), had schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (76.5%), had a substance use disorder (62.1%), and had a most serious index offence against the person (80.4%). Atypical antipsychotics accounted for the majority of antipsychotic prescriptions (75.9%) and the sample had an antipsychotic polypharmacy rate of 39.9%. The sample was divided into four primary antipsychotic formulation types, which were oral (34.0%), injection (39.2%), clozapine (19.0%), and subtherapeutic (7.8%). Regarding rehospitalization, 52.9% of the sample was rehospitalized, with the average number of rehospitalizations being 1.2 (<i>SD</i> = 1.7) and proportion of the follow up period rehospitalized being 16.4% (<i>SD</i> = 27.7%). Patients prescribed clozapine had numerically lower rates of rehospitalization than those prescribed oral and injection formulation types, but it was not statistically significant. With a 19.0% prescription rate, clozapine may be underutilized in this sample. Further research is needed to demonstrate the potential benefits of clozapine regarding rehospitalization in forensic psychiatric patients, as has already been done in general psychiatry. Advancing treatment of the high-profile forensic population can reduce stigma toward people with mental illness and criminal justice involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antipsychotic prescribing practices and their association with rehospitalization in a forensic psychiatric sample.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Goody, Karen Petersen, Johann Brink, Anne G Crocker, Tonia Nicholls\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1474626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While there is extensive literature examining the effectiveness of antipsychotic prescribing to patients with schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorders in general psychiatric services, there is a dearth of studies examining antipsychotic prescribing practices and their effectiveness in forensic psychiatric services. Forensic psychiatric patients have unique challenges often due to their high-profile offences, public scrutiny, and legal requirements. This longitudinal, retrospective study aimed to examine antipsychotic prescribing and rehospitalization rates in a forensic psychiatric sample, along with relevant socio-demographic, clinical, and forensic characteristics. All patients had a psychotic illness and were prescribed antipsychotic medication. The sample included 153 patients, of which the majority were male (85.6%), Caucasian (71.2%), middle aged (30s to 50s), had schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (76.5%), had a substance use disorder (62.1%), and had a most serious index offence against the person (80.4%). Atypical antipsychotics accounted for the majority of antipsychotic prescriptions (75.9%) and the sample had an antipsychotic polypharmacy rate of 39.9%. The sample was divided into four primary antipsychotic formulation types, which were oral (34.0%), injection (39.2%), clozapine (19.0%), and subtherapeutic (7.8%). Regarding rehospitalization, 52.9% of the sample was rehospitalized, with the average number of rehospitalizations being 1.2 (<i>SD</i> = 1.7) and proportion of the follow up period rehospitalized being 16.4% (<i>SD</i> = 27.7%). Patients prescribed clozapine had numerically lower rates of rehospitalization than those prescribed oral and injection formulation types, but it was not statistically significant. With a 19.0% prescription rate, clozapine may be underutilized in this sample. Further research is needed to demonstrate the potential benefits of clozapine regarding rehospitalization in forensic psychiatric patients, as has already been done in general psychiatry. Advancing treatment of the high-profile forensic population can reduce stigma toward people with mental illness and criminal justice involvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544125/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1474626\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1474626","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然有大量文献研究了在普通精神科服务中为精神分裂症谱系或其他精神障碍患者开具抗精神病药物处方的有效性,但却缺乏对法医精神科服务中抗精神病药物处方及其有效性的研究。法医精神病患者往往因其引人注目的罪行、公众监督和法律要求而面临独特的挑战。这项纵向回顾性研究旨在考察法医精神病样本中的抗精神病药物处方和再住院率,以及相关的社会人口、临床和法医特征。所有患者均患有精神病,并被处方抗精神病药物。样本包括 153 名患者,其中大多数为男性(85.6%)、白种人(71.2%)、中年人(30 至 50 岁)、精神分裂症或情感分裂症患者(76.5%)、药物使用障碍患者(62.1%)以及有最严重的人身伤害罪(80.4%)。非典型抗精神病药物占抗精神病药物处方的绝大部分(75.9%),样本的抗精神病药物多重用药率为 39.9%。样本分为四种主要的抗精神病药物剂型,分别是口服(34.0%)、注射(39.2%)、氯氮平(19.0%)和亚治疗(7.8%)。在再次住院方面,52.9%的样本再次住院,平均再次住院次数为1.2次(标准差=1.7),随访期间再次住院的比例为16.4%(标准差=27.7%)。与口服和注射制剂相比,处方氯氮平的患者再住院率较低,但没有统计学意义。氯氮平的处方率为 19.0%,在该样本中可能未得到充分利用。还需要进一步的研究来证明氯氮平对法医精神病患者再住院的潜在益处,就像在普通精神病学中所做的那样。推进对备受关注的法医人群的治疗,可以减少人们对精神疾病患者和刑事司法参与的偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antipsychotic prescribing practices and their association with rehospitalization in a forensic psychiatric sample.

While there is extensive literature examining the effectiveness of antipsychotic prescribing to patients with schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorders in general psychiatric services, there is a dearth of studies examining antipsychotic prescribing practices and their effectiveness in forensic psychiatric services. Forensic psychiatric patients have unique challenges often due to their high-profile offences, public scrutiny, and legal requirements. This longitudinal, retrospective study aimed to examine antipsychotic prescribing and rehospitalization rates in a forensic psychiatric sample, along with relevant socio-demographic, clinical, and forensic characteristics. All patients had a psychotic illness and were prescribed antipsychotic medication. The sample included 153 patients, of which the majority were male (85.6%), Caucasian (71.2%), middle aged (30s to 50s), had schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (76.5%), had a substance use disorder (62.1%), and had a most serious index offence against the person (80.4%). Atypical antipsychotics accounted for the majority of antipsychotic prescriptions (75.9%) and the sample had an antipsychotic polypharmacy rate of 39.9%. The sample was divided into four primary antipsychotic formulation types, which were oral (34.0%), injection (39.2%), clozapine (19.0%), and subtherapeutic (7.8%). Regarding rehospitalization, 52.9% of the sample was rehospitalized, with the average number of rehospitalizations being 1.2 (SD = 1.7) and proportion of the follow up period rehospitalized being 16.4% (SD = 27.7%). Patients prescribed clozapine had numerically lower rates of rehospitalization than those prescribed oral and injection formulation types, but it was not statistically significant. With a 19.0% prescription rate, clozapine may be underutilized in this sample. Further research is needed to demonstrate the potential benefits of clozapine regarding rehospitalization in forensic psychiatric patients, as has already been done in general psychiatry. Advancing treatment of the high-profile forensic population can reduce stigma toward people with mental illness and criminal justice involvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Effects of yoga on stress in stressed adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Technology-facilitated sexual violence among Italian youths: validation of the technology-facilitated sexual violence victimization scale. Youth Epidemiology and Resilience (YEAR) in a student population: prevalence and predictors of mental health symptoms. Implementing a stabilizing intervention for traumatized refugees in temporary accommodations in South-West Germany - a randomized controlled pilot trial. Mendelian randomization analysis of causal and druggable circulating inflammatory proteins in schizophrenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1