Hasan Sarfaraz, Pooja P Netalkar, Mallika Shetty, Mohammed Zahid, Rajesh Shetty
{"title":"粘结螺钉固位种植修复体表面的去污处理:三种不同后处理清洁技术的比较。","authors":"Hasan Sarfaraz, Pooja P Netalkar, Mallika Shetty, Mohammed Zahid, Rajesh Shetty","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Bonded screw-retained implant-supported prostheses may become contaminated during fabrication, leading to biological complications. Studies supporting effective cleaning methods are sparse.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this in -vitro study was to compare the effectiveness of 3 different cleaning techniques for the removal of contaminants on the surfaces of bonded screw-retained implant-supported prostheses.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-five screw-retained implant-supported prostheses were divided into 3 groups after their processing in the digital laboratory. Group VS included specimens cleaned using vapor steam, group ME using a multi-enzyme cleaner in an ultrasonic bath, and group 3UC using the 3-step ultrasonic cleaning method with different solutions. The presence of contaminants was determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) under ×200 and ×500 magnifications and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The ImageJ software program was used to locate and quantify the debris. Statistical tests, including the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn test were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the 3 cleaning techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences in the number of surface contaminants were observed at the implant-abutment interface in all 3 groups (P<.05) after each cleaning technique, with the highest mean difference for the 3-step ultrasonic cleaning. Elements such as carbon, oxygen, titanium, and calcium showed statistically significant differences (P<.05) compared with other elements among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All 3 cleaning techniques reduced the contaminants on the surfaces of the screw-retained implant-supported prostheses. The 3-step ultrasonic cleaning method yielded the best results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decontaminating the surfaces of bonded screw-retained implant prostheses: A comparison of three different post-processing cleaning techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Hasan Sarfaraz, Pooja P Netalkar, Mallika Shetty, Mohammed Zahid, Rajesh Shetty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Bonded screw-retained implant-supported prostheses may become contaminated during fabrication, leading to biological complications. Studies supporting effective cleaning methods are sparse.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this in -vitro study was to compare the effectiveness of 3 different cleaning techniques for the removal of contaminants on the surfaces of bonded screw-retained implant-supported prostheses.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-five screw-retained implant-supported prostheses were divided into 3 groups after their processing in the digital laboratory. Group VS included specimens cleaned using vapor steam, group ME using a multi-enzyme cleaner in an ultrasonic bath, and group 3UC using the 3-step ultrasonic cleaning method with different solutions. The presence of contaminants was determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) under ×200 and ×500 magnifications and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The ImageJ software program was used to locate and quantify the debris. Statistical tests, including the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn test were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the 3 cleaning techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences in the number of surface contaminants were observed at the implant-abutment interface in all 3 groups (P<.05) after each cleaning technique, with the highest mean difference for the 3-step ultrasonic cleaning. Elements such as carbon, oxygen, titanium, and calcium showed statistically significant differences (P<.05) compared with other elements among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All 3 cleaning techniques reduced the contaminants on the surfaces of the screw-retained implant-supported prostheses. The 3-step ultrasonic cleaning method yielded the best results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Decontaminating the surfaces of bonded screw-retained implant prostheses: A comparison of three different post-processing cleaning techniques.
Statement of problem: Bonded screw-retained implant-supported prostheses may become contaminated during fabrication, leading to biological complications. Studies supporting effective cleaning methods are sparse.
Purpose: The purpose of this in -vitro study was to compare the effectiveness of 3 different cleaning techniques for the removal of contaminants on the surfaces of bonded screw-retained implant-supported prostheses.
Material and methods: Forty-five screw-retained implant-supported prostheses were divided into 3 groups after their processing in the digital laboratory. Group VS included specimens cleaned using vapor steam, group ME using a multi-enzyme cleaner in an ultrasonic bath, and group 3UC using the 3-step ultrasonic cleaning method with different solutions. The presence of contaminants was determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) under ×200 and ×500 magnifications and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The ImageJ software program was used to locate and quantify the debris. Statistical tests, including the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn test were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the 3 cleaning techniques.
Results: Statistically significant differences in the number of surface contaminants were observed at the implant-abutment interface in all 3 groups (P<.05) after each cleaning technique, with the highest mean difference for the 3-step ultrasonic cleaning. Elements such as carbon, oxygen, titanium, and calcium showed statistically significant differences (P<.05) compared with other elements among the groups.
Conclusions: All 3 cleaning techniques reduced the contaminants on the surfaces of the screw-retained implant-supported prostheses. The 3-step ultrasonic cleaning method yielded the best results.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.