Sarcopenia 定义和结果联盟标准对老年心力衰竭患者的预后价值

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105350
Taisuke Nakade MD , Daichi Maeda MD, PhD , Yuya Matsue MD, PhD , Nobuyuki Kagiyama MD, PhD , Yudai Fujimoto MD , Tsutomu Sunayama MD, PhD , Taishi Dotare MD, PhD , Kentaro Jujo MD, PhD , Kazuya Saito PT, MSc , Kentaro Kamiya PT, PhD , Hiroshi Saito PT, PhD , Yuki Ogasahara RN , Emi Maekawa MD, PhD , Masaaki Konishi MD, PhD , Takeshi Kitai MD, PhD , Kentaro Iwata PT, MSc , Hiroshi Wada MD, PhD , Takatoshi Kasai MD, PhD , Hirofumi Nagamatsu MD, PhD , Shin-ichi Momomura MD, PhD , Tohru Minamino MD, PhD
{"title":"Sarcopenia 定义和结果联盟标准对老年心力衰竭患者的预后价值","authors":"Taisuke Nakade MD ,&nbsp;Daichi Maeda MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yuya Matsue MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Kagiyama MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yudai Fujimoto MD ,&nbsp;Tsutomu Sunayama MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Taishi Dotare MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kentaro Jujo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kazuya Saito PT, MSc ,&nbsp;Kentaro Kamiya PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Saito PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Yuki Ogasahara RN ,&nbsp;Emi Maekawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Masaaki Konishi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takeshi Kitai MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kentaro Iwata PT, MSc ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Wada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takatoshi Kasai MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hirofumi Nagamatsu MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Shin-ichi Momomura MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tohru Minamino MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia in 2019 (AWGS 2019) emphasized muscle mass measurements. In contrast, the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) prioritizes functional strength and mobility. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the prognostic utility of the SDOC and AWGS 2019 criteria for all-cause mortality in older patients with heart failure.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A post hoc analysis of the Prevalence and Prognostic Value of Physical and Social Frailty in Geriatric Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure (FRAGILE-HF) study, a prospective, multicenter, observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Patients aged ≥65 years hospitalized for heart failure across 15 hospitals in Japan.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the AWGS 2019 and SDOC definitions. According to the SDOC criteria and by integrating insights from previous research, patients were categorized into nonsarcopenia, possible sarcopenia, and sarcopenia groups. The primary outcome was 2-year mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 1282 study patients, possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia were diagnosed in 357 and 786 individuals, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a significant difference between the groups. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated a significant stepwise association between sarcopenic status and mortality risk (possible sarcopenia: hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.66–2.28; <em>P</em> = .525; sarcopenia: hazard ratio, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.08–3.34; <em>P</em> = .027). When sarcopenia defined by the SDOC and AWGS 2019 criteria was added to the model incorporating conventional risk factors, no significant difference was observed in the prognostic capabilities between the 2 models (net reclassification improvement, −0.009; 95% CI, −0.193 to 0.174; <em>P</em> = .920, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.697 for SDOC and 0.703 for AWGS 2019; <em>P</em> = .675).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>Among older patients with heart failure, the SDOC criteria for sarcopenia diagnosis are useful for risk stratification and provide prognostic capabilities equivalent to those of the AWGS 2019 criteria.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 1","pages":"Article 105350"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Value of Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium Criteria in Older Patients with Heart Failure\",\"authors\":\"Taisuke Nakade MD ,&nbsp;Daichi Maeda MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yuya Matsue MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Kagiyama MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yudai Fujimoto MD ,&nbsp;Tsutomu Sunayama MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Taishi Dotare MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kentaro Jujo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kazuya Saito PT, MSc ,&nbsp;Kentaro Kamiya PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Saito PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Yuki Ogasahara RN ,&nbsp;Emi Maekawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Masaaki Konishi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takeshi Kitai MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kentaro Iwata PT, MSc ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Wada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takatoshi Kasai MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hirofumi Nagamatsu MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Shin-ichi Momomura MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tohru Minamino MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia in 2019 (AWGS 2019) emphasized muscle mass measurements. In contrast, the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) prioritizes functional strength and mobility. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the prognostic utility of the SDOC and AWGS 2019 criteria for all-cause mortality in older patients with heart failure.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A post hoc analysis of the Prevalence and Prognostic Value of Physical and Social Frailty in Geriatric Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure (FRAGILE-HF) study, a prospective, multicenter, observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Patients aged ≥65 years hospitalized for heart failure across 15 hospitals in Japan.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the AWGS 2019 and SDOC definitions. According to the SDOC criteria and by integrating insights from previous research, patients were categorized into nonsarcopenia, possible sarcopenia, and sarcopenia groups. The primary outcome was 2-year mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 1282 study patients, possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia were diagnosed in 357 and 786 individuals, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a significant difference between the groups. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated a significant stepwise association between sarcopenic status and mortality risk (possible sarcopenia: hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.66–2.28; <em>P</em> = .525; sarcopenia: hazard ratio, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.08–3.34; <em>P</em> = .027). When sarcopenia defined by the SDOC and AWGS 2019 criteria was added to the model incorporating conventional risk factors, no significant difference was observed in the prognostic capabilities between the 2 models (net reclassification improvement, −0.009; 95% CI, −0.193 to 0.174; <em>P</em> = .920, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.697 for SDOC and 0.703 for AWGS 2019; <em>P</em> = .675).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>Among older patients with heart failure, the SDOC criteria for sarcopenia diagnosis are useful for risk stratification and provide prognostic capabilities equivalent to those of the AWGS 2019 criteria.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 105350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024007722\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024007722","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:2019 年亚洲 Sarcopenia 工作组(AWGS 2019)强调肌肉质量测量。相比之下,"肌肉疏松症定义与结果联盟"(SDOC)则优先考虑功能强度和活动能力。因此,本研究旨在比较 SDOC 和 AWGS 2019 标准对老年心衰患者全因死亡率的预后效用:FRAGILE-HF研究是一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究:环境和参与者:日本 15 家医院中因心力衰竭住院的年龄≥65 岁的患者:根据 AWGS 2019 和 SDOC 的定义诊断 "肌肉疏松症"。根据 SDOC 标准并结合以往研究的见解,将患者分为非肌肉疏松症组、可能肌肉疏松症组和肌肉疏松症组。主要结果为2年死亡率:结果:在 1282 名研究患者中,分别有 357 人和 786 人被诊断为可能的肌肉疏松症和肌肉疏松症。卡普兰-梅耶分析显示,两组之间存在显著差异。调整后的考克斯比例危险分析表明,肌肉疏松状态与死亡风险之间存在显著的逐步关联(可能的肌肉疏松症:危险比为 1.22;95% CI 为 0.66-2.28;P = .525;肌肉疏松症:危险比为 1.89;95% CI 为 1.08-3.34;P = .027)。当将SDOC和AWGS 2019标准定义的肌肉疏松症加入到包含常规风险因素的模型中时,两种模型的预后能力没有明显差异(净再分类改善率为-0.009;95% CI为-0.193至0.174;P = .920,SDOC的接收者操作特征曲线下面积为0.697,AWGS 2019的接收者操作特征曲线下面积为0.703;P = .675):在老年心力衰竭患者中,SDOC 肌肉疏松症诊断标准有助于进行风险分层,其预后能力与 AWGS 2019 标准相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic Value of Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium Criteria in Older Patients with Heart Failure

Objectives

The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia in 2019 (AWGS 2019) emphasized muscle mass measurements. In contrast, the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) prioritizes functional strength and mobility. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the prognostic utility of the SDOC and AWGS 2019 criteria for all-cause mortality in older patients with heart failure.

Design

A post hoc analysis of the Prevalence and Prognostic Value of Physical and Social Frailty in Geriatric Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure (FRAGILE-HF) study, a prospective, multicenter, observational study.

Setting and Participants

Patients aged ≥65 years hospitalized for heart failure across 15 hospitals in Japan.

Methods

Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the AWGS 2019 and SDOC definitions. According to the SDOC criteria and by integrating insights from previous research, patients were categorized into nonsarcopenia, possible sarcopenia, and sarcopenia groups. The primary outcome was 2-year mortality.

Results

Of the 1282 study patients, possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia were diagnosed in 357 and 786 individuals, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a significant difference between the groups. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated a significant stepwise association between sarcopenic status and mortality risk (possible sarcopenia: hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.66–2.28; P = .525; sarcopenia: hazard ratio, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.08–3.34; P = .027). When sarcopenia defined by the SDOC and AWGS 2019 criteria was added to the model incorporating conventional risk factors, no significant difference was observed in the prognostic capabilities between the 2 models (net reclassification improvement, −0.009; 95% CI, −0.193 to 0.174; P = .920, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.697 for SDOC and 0.703 for AWGS 2019; P = .675).

Conclusions and Implications

Among older patients with heart failure, the SDOC criteria for sarcopenia diagnosis are useful for risk stratification and provide prognostic capabilities equivalent to those of the AWGS 2019 criteria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents General Information Directions & Connections PALTmed Events and Products
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1