基于机器学习的髓母细胞瘤生存预测模型:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1007/s10072-024-07879-w
Bardia Hajikarimloo, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Mohammadamin Sabbagh Alvani, Sima Osouli Meinagh, Alireza Kooshki, Omid Afkhami-Ardakani, Fatemeh Rasouli, Salem M Tos, Roozbeh Tavanaei, Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand, Rana Hashemi, Arman Hasanzade
{"title":"基于机器学习的髓母细胞瘤生存预测模型:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Bardia Hajikarimloo, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Mohammadamin Sabbagh Alvani, Sima Osouli Meinagh, Alireza Kooshki, Omid Afkhami-Ardakani, Fatemeh Rasouli, Salem M Tos, Roozbeh Tavanaei, Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand, Rana Hashemi, Arman Hasanzade","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07879-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medulloblastoma (MB) is the pediatric population's most frequent malignant intracranial lesions. Prognostication plays a crucial role in optimizing treatment strategy in the MB setting. Several studies have developed ML-based models to predict survival outcomes in individuals with MB. In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, we aimed to evaluate the role of ML-based models in predicting survival in MB patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Literature records were retrieved on May 14th, 2024, using the relevant key terms without filters in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Records were screened according to the eligibility criteria, and the data from the included studies were extracted. The quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted using R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies were included, with 2771 patients ranging from 46 to 1759 individuals. A total of 23 ML and DL models were developed, 20 of which were ML and three DL. Random forest (RF) was the most frequent classifier, as it was utilized in nine models, followed by support vector machine (SVM). Eight models were included in the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis revealed a pooled AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.75-0.80). In addition, the radionics-based and genomics-based models had a pooled AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.76-079) and 0.76 (0.63-0.88), respectively (P = 0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggested that ML-based models, especially ML algorithms, could play a vital and efficient role in the prediction of survival of patients based on radiomics and genomics.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning-based models for prediction of survival in medulloblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Bardia Hajikarimloo, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Mohammadamin Sabbagh Alvani, Sima Osouli Meinagh, Alireza Kooshki, Omid Afkhami-Ardakani, Fatemeh Rasouli, Salem M Tos, Roozbeh Tavanaei, Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand, Rana Hashemi, Arman Hasanzade\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10072-024-07879-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medulloblastoma (MB) is the pediatric population's most frequent malignant intracranial lesions. Prognostication plays a crucial role in optimizing treatment strategy in the MB setting. Several studies have developed ML-based models to predict survival outcomes in individuals with MB. In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, we aimed to evaluate the role of ML-based models in predicting survival in MB patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Literature records were retrieved on May 14th, 2024, using the relevant key terms without filters in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Records were screened according to the eligibility criteria, and the data from the included studies were extracted. The quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted using R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies were included, with 2771 patients ranging from 46 to 1759 individuals. A total of 23 ML and DL models were developed, 20 of which were ML and three DL. Random forest (RF) was the most frequent classifier, as it was utilized in nine models, followed by support vector machine (SVM). Eight models were included in the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis revealed a pooled AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.75-0.80). In addition, the radionics-based and genomics-based models had a pooled AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.76-079) and 0.76 (0.63-0.88), respectively (P = 0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggested that ML-based models, especially ML algorithms, could play a vital and efficient role in the prediction of survival of patients based on radiomics and genomics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07879-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07879-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:髓母细胞瘤(MB髓母细胞瘤(MB)是儿科最常见的颅内恶性病变。在髓母细胞瘤的治疗过程中,预后对优化治疗策略起着至关重要的作用。一些研究开发了基于 ML 的模型来预测 MB 患者的生存结果。在这项系统回顾和荟萃分析研究中,我们旨在评估基于ML的模型在预测MB患者生存率方面的作用:我们于 2024 年 5 月 14 日在 PubMed、Embase、Scopus 和 Web of Science 中使用相关关键词检索了文献记录。根据资格标准对记录进行筛选,并提取纳入研究的数据。采用 QUADAS-2 工具进行质量评估。使用 R 软件进行荟萃分析和敏感性分析:共纳入 6 项研究,2771 名患者,年龄从 46 岁到 1759 岁不等。共建立了 23 个 ML 和 DL 模型,其中 20 个为 ML,3 个为 DL。随机森林(RF)是最常用的分类器,在 9 个模型中使用,其次是支持向量机(SVM)。8 个模型被纳入荟萃分析。我们的荟萃分析显示,汇总的 AUC 为 0.77(95% CI:0.75-0.80)。此外,基于放射学的模型和基于基因组学的模型的集合AUC分别为0.77(95% CI:0.76-079)和0.76(0.63-0.88)(P = 0.77):我们的研究结果表明,基于放射组学和基因组学的 ML 模型,尤其是 ML 算法,可以在预测患者生存率方面发挥重要而有效的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning-based models for prediction of survival in medulloblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Medulloblastoma (MB) is the pediatric population's most frequent malignant intracranial lesions. Prognostication plays a crucial role in optimizing treatment strategy in the MB setting. Several studies have developed ML-based models to predict survival outcomes in individuals with MB. In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, we aimed to evaluate the role of ML-based models in predicting survival in MB patients.

Method: Literature records were retrieved on May 14th, 2024, using the relevant key terms without filters in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Records were screened according to the eligibility criteria, and the data from the included studies were extracted. The quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted using R software.

Results: Six studies were included, with 2771 patients ranging from 46 to 1759 individuals. A total of 23 ML and DL models were developed, 20 of which were ML and three DL. Random forest (RF) was the most frequent classifier, as it was utilized in nine models, followed by support vector machine (SVM). Eight models were included in the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis revealed a pooled AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.75-0.80). In addition, the radionics-based and genomics-based models had a pooled AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.76-079) and 0.76 (0.63-0.88), respectively (P = 0.77).

Conclusion: Our results suggested that ML-based models, especially ML algorithms, could play a vital and efficient role in the prediction of survival of patients based on radiomics and genomics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke with large infarct, short‑ and long‑term outcomes: a meta‑analysis of 6 randomised control trials. Correction to: Clinical, electrophysiological, and genetic analysis of a family with two rare neuromuscular disorders: congenital myasthenic syndrome and hereditary polyneuropathy. Endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke with large infarct, short- and long-term outcomes: a meta-analysis of 6 randomised control trials. Effect of intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular therapy on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke with large core: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Efficacy of pain management strategies in adults with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1