调查有助于学生准备 NAPLEX 考试的观念和行为。

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102228
Benjamin Shultz, Jeffrey Mucksavage, Kristen Goliak, Jen Phillips, Mathew Thambi
{"title":"调查有助于学生准备 NAPLEX 考试的观念和行为。","authors":"Benjamin Shultz,&nbsp;Jeffrey Mucksavage,&nbsp;Kristen Goliak,&nbsp;Jen Phillips,&nbsp;Mathew Thambi","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) is a critical assessment for pharmacy graduates. Declining first-time pass rates have led to increased focus on preparation strategies. This study evaluates a year-long NAPLEX preparation curriculum integrated into the fourth-year PharmD program, focusing on student perceptions, engagement, and performance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A longitudinal, structured NAPLEX preparation curriculum was implemented for 151 fourth-year pharmacy students. The curriculum included mandatory assessments aligned with the NAPLEX blueprint and a self-directed study component using the UWorld Pharmacy RxPrep platform. Student engagement was quantified using a Usage Index derived from platform activity logs. A post-curriculum survey assessed students' perceptions of the program, which was analyzed using Principal Components Analysis (PCA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Variability in student engagement was observed, with the Usage Index showing a moderate correlation with performance on NAPLEX-style assessments. PCA identified four key components influencing students' NAPLEX preparation: Perceived Usefulness, Curriculum Effectiveness, Temporal Utilization, and Strategic Preparedness. Temporal Utilization was the only component strongly correlated with assessment outcomes, highlighting the importance of consistent resource use.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Regular engagement with preparation resources was linked to better performance, though student perceptions of usefulness did not always align with exam performance. This highlights the complexity of preparing for high-stakes exams, where subjective evaluations of resources may not fully capture their effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study underscores the need for consistent engagement with preparation resources and highlights potential areas for improvement in NAPLEX preparation strategies. Future research should focus on strategies to improve student engagement and enhance self-assessment skills to better align perceptions with performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the perceptions and behaviors that contribute to student preparation for the NAPLEX exam\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Shultz,&nbsp;Jeffrey Mucksavage,&nbsp;Kristen Goliak,&nbsp;Jen Phillips,&nbsp;Mathew Thambi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) is a critical assessment for pharmacy graduates. Declining first-time pass rates have led to increased focus on preparation strategies. This study evaluates a year-long NAPLEX preparation curriculum integrated into the fourth-year PharmD program, focusing on student perceptions, engagement, and performance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A longitudinal, structured NAPLEX preparation curriculum was implemented for 151 fourth-year pharmacy students. The curriculum included mandatory assessments aligned with the NAPLEX blueprint and a self-directed study component using the UWorld Pharmacy RxPrep platform. Student engagement was quantified using a Usage Index derived from platform activity logs. A post-curriculum survey assessed students' perceptions of the program, which was analyzed using Principal Components Analysis (PCA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Variability in student engagement was observed, with the Usage Index showing a moderate correlation with performance on NAPLEX-style assessments. PCA identified four key components influencing students' NAPLEX preparation: Perceived Usefulness, Curriculum Effectiveness, Temporal Utilization, and Strategic Preparedness. Temporal Utilization was the only component strongly correlated with assessment outcomes, highlighting the importance of consistent resource use.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Regular engagement with preparation resources was linked to better performance, though student perceptions of usefulness did not always align with exam performance. This highlights the complexity of preparing for high-stakes exams, where subjective evaluations of resources may not fully capture their effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study underscores the need for consistent engagement with preparation resources and highlights potential areas for improvement in NAPLEX preparation strategies. Future research should focus on strategies to improve student engagement and enhance self-assessment skills to better align perceptions with performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 102228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724002600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724002600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:北美药剂师执业资格考试 (NAPLEX) 是对药剂学毕业生的一项重要评估。首次通过率的下降导致人们越来越关注备考策略。本研究评估了整合到药学博士四年级课程中的为期一年的 NAPLEX 备考课程,重点关注学生的看法、参与度和成绩:方法:为 151 名药学专业四年级学生实施了纵向、结构化的 NAPLEX 备考课程。该课程包括与 NAPLEX 蓝图一致的必修评估和使用 UWorld Pharmacy RxPrep 平台的自主学习部分。根据平台活动日志得出的使用指数对学生的参与度进行了量化。课程结束后的调查评估了学生对课程的看法,并使用主成分分析法(PCA)对其进行了分析:结果:观察到学生参与度存在差异,使用指数与 NAPLEX 类型评估的成绩呈中度相关。PCA 确定了影响学生 NAPLEX 备考的四个关键因素:感知有用性、课程有效性、时间利用和战略准备。时间利用是唯一一个与评估结果密切相关的组成部分,突出了持续使用资源的重要性:经常使用备考资源与提高成绩有关,尽管学生对有用性的看法并不总是与考试成绩一致。这凸显了准备高风险考试的复杂性,对资源的主观评价可能无法完全反映其有效性:本研究强调了持续使用备考资源的必要性,并突出了 NAPLEX 备考策略中可能需要改进的地方。未来的研究应重点关注提高学生参与度和增强自我评估技能的策略,以便更好地将认知与成绩结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating the perceptions and behaviors that contribute to student preparation for the NAPLEX exam

Introduction

The North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) is a critical assessment for pharmacy graduates. Declining first-time pass rates have led to increased focus on preparation strategies. This study evaluates a year-long NAPLEX preparation curriculum integrated into the fourth-year PharmD program, focusing on student perceptions, engagement, and performance.

Methods

A longitudinal, structured NAPLEX preparation curriculum was implemented for 151 fourth-year pharmacy students. The curriculum included mandatory assessments aligned with the NAPLEX blueprint and a self-directed study component using the UWorld Pharmacy RxPrep platform. Student engagement was quantified using a Usage Index derived from platform activity logs. A post-curriculum survey assessed students' perceptions of the program, which was analyzed using Principal Components Analysis (PCA).

Results

Variability in student engagement was observed, with the Usage Index showing a moderate correlation with performance on NAPLEX-style assessments. PCA identified four key components influencing students' NAPLEX preparation: Perceived Usefulness, Curriculum Effectiveness, Temporal Utilization, and Strategic Preparedness. Temporal Utilization was the only component strongly correlated with assessment outcomes, highlighting the importance of consistent resource use.

Discussion

Regular engagement with preparation resources was linked to better performance, though student perceptions of usefulness did not always align with exam performance. This highlights the complexity of preparing for high-stakes exams, where subjective evaluations of resources may not fully capture their effectiveness.

Conclusion

This study underscores the need for consistent engagement with preparation resources and highlights potential areas for improvement in NAPLEX preparation strategies. Future research should focus on strategies to improve student engagement and enhance self-assessment skills to better align perceptions with performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Preceptor perspectives on disability-related accommodations in pharmacy experiential education Practice transformation starts in the classroom: Mapping practice change learning in a PharmD program Keeping pace in the age of innovation: The perspective of Dutch pharmaceutical science students on the position of machine learning training in an undergraduate curriculum Live and learn: Utilizing MyDispense to increase student knowledge and confidence in caring for patients with diverse religious backgrounds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1