非手术治疗中复发性胆囊炎的临床预测因素:系统回顾与荟萃分析。

Ahmed Salama, Gavin G Calpin, Raymond Fuller, Arnold D K Hill
{"title":"非手术治疗中复发性胆囊炎的临床预测因素:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Ahmed Salama, Gavin G Calpin, Raymond Fuller, Arnold D K Hill","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gallstone disease is prevalent and carries substantial implications for morbidity and healthcare resource utilization. While early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is often preferred, its feasibility may be limited in some cases. As a result, many patients undergo conservative management.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To conduct a systematic review of the current literature to identify studies reporting on clinical predictors of recurrence in patients who undergo non-operative management of acute cholecystitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Studies comparing variables in patients who had acute cholecystitis recurrence (ACR) were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three studies were included in the review. There were 678 patients in total with a 28.5 % recurrence rate. Age, history of biliary disease, and severity of cholecystitis were identified as potential predictors of ACR. Biochemical results, such as inflammatory markers, white cells, and albumin levels, may also play a role. Radiological findings, including gallbladder wall thickness and stone characteristics, showed potential as predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying patients at risk of recurrent cholecystitis is important in guiding clinical decision-making. While certain findings show promise as predictors, the available evidence is limited and inconclusive. Larger studies are needed to develop risk stratification tools for better management of gallstone disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical predictors of recurrent cholecystitis in non-operative management: A systematic review & meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Salama, Gavin G Calpin, Raymond Fuller, Arnold D K Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surge.2024.11.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gallstone disease is prevalent and carries substantial implications for morbidity and healthcare resource utilization. While early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is often preferred, its feasibility may be limited in some cases. As a result, many patients undergo conservative management.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To conduct a systematic review of the current literature to identify studies reporting on clinical predictors of recurrence in patients who undergo non-operative management of acute cholecystitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Studies comparing variables in patients who had acute cholecystitis recurrence (ACR) were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three studies were included in the review. There were 678 patients in total with a 28.5 % recurrence rate. Age, history of biliary disease, and severity of cholecystitis were identified as potential predictors of ACR. Biochemical results, such as inflammatory markers, white cells, and albumin levels, may also play a role. Radiological findings, including gallbladder wall thickness and stone characteristics, showed potential as predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying patients at risk of recurrent cholecystitis is important in guiding clinical decision-making. While certain findings show promise as predictors, the available evidence is limited and inconclusive. Larger studies are needed to develop risk stratification tools for better management of gallstone disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2024.11.004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2024.11.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:胆石症很普遍,对发病率和医疗资源利用率有很大影响。虽然早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)通常是首选,但在某些病例中其可行性可能有限。目的:对现有文献进行系统性回顾,以确定对急性胆囊炎进行非手术治疗的患者复发的临床预测因素:方法:根据 PRISMA 和 MOOSE 指南进行系统性综述。方法:根据PRISMA和MOOSE指南进行了系统性综述,纳入了对急性胆囊炎复发(ACR)患者的变量进行比较的研究:结果:共纳入三项研究。共有 678 名患者,复发率为 28.5%。年龄、胆道疾病史和胆囊炎的严重程度被认为是 ACR 的潜在预测因素。生化检查结果,如炎症标志物、白细胞和白蛋白水平,也可能是影响因素之一。包括胆囊壁厚度和结石特征在内的放射学检查结果也有可能成为预测因素:结论:识别有复发性胆囊炎风险的患者对于指导临床决策非常重要。虽然某些检查结果显示有可能成为预测指标,但现有的证据有限且不确定。需要进行更大规模的研究来开发风险分层工具,以便更好地管理胆石症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical predictors of recurrent cholecystitis in non-operative management: A systematic review & meta-analysis.

Introduction: Gallstone disease is prevalent and carries substantial implications for morbidity and healthcare resource utilization. While early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is often preferred, its feasibility may be limited in some cases. As a result, many patients undergo conservative management.

Aims: To conduct a systematic review of the current literature to identify studies reporting on clinical predictors of recurrence in patients who undergo non-operative management of acute cholecystitis.

Methods: A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Studies comparing variables in patients who had acute cholecystitis recurrence (ACR) were included.

Results: Three studies were included in the review. There were 678 patients in total with a 28.5 % recurrence rate. Age, history of biliary disease, and severity of cholecystitis were identified as potential predictors of ACR. Biochemical results, such as inflammatory markers, white cells, and albumin levels, may also play a role. Radiological findings, including gallbladder wall thickness and stone characteristics, showed potential as predictors.

Conclusion: Identifying patients at risk of recurrent cholecystitis is important in guiding clinical decision-making. While certain findings show promise as predictors, the available evidence is limited and inconclusive. Larger studies are needed to develop risk stratification tools for better management of gallstone disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
期刊最新文献
Enhancements in artificial intelligence for medical examinations: A leap from ChatGPT 3.5 to ChatGPT 4.0 in the FRCS trauma & orthopaedics examination. A boost to concentration or a distracting noise? A systematic review of surgeon and anaesthetist perspectives of the benefit of intra-operative music. List of editors Surgeon ability to predict physical activity and sedentary time: Comparison of self-reported and measured activity Sensitivity and specificity of surgeons' intra-operative diagnosis of appendicitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1