ICP 泪道镜测量泪液半月板高度和无创破裂时间的会内重复性和观察者间重复性。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Contact Lens & Anterior Eye Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.clae.2024.102333
Ana Rosa Barrio, Mariano González-Pérez, Pedro Arriola-Villalobos, Beatriz Antona
{"title":"ICP 泪道镜测量泪液半月板高度和无创破裂时间的会内重复性和观察者间重复性。","authors":"Ana Rosa Barrio, Mariano González-Pérez, Pedro Arriola-Villalobos, Beatriz Antona","doi":"10.1016/j.clae.2024.102333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine intrasession repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of tear meniscus height (TMH) and non-invasive tear breakup time (NIBUT) measurements provided by ICP Tearscope, and their agreement with Keratograph 5 M measurements in persons with and without dry eye.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 48 individuals with dry eye disease (DED) and 44 healthy controls. To determine intrasession repeatability, two consecutive TMH and NIBUT measurements were carried out by a single experienced examiner using ICP Tearscope. For interobserver reproducibility, a second masked investigator measured TMH and NIBUT on the first image and video captured by the examiner. Keratograph 5 M measurements of both variables were carried out by the same examiner. Repeatability and reproducibility were evaluated through within-subject standard deviation (Sw), coefficient of variation (CoV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots (bias and limits of agreement (LoA)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TMH measurement with ICP Tearscope showed both, a moderate intrasession repeatability (Sw = 0.045, CoV < 19.82 %, ICC > 0.684) and interobserver reproducibility (Sw = 0.032, CoV < 14.09 %, ICC > 0.926). The NIBUT measurement showed worse intrasession repeatability in the DED group (CoV = 27.53 %) than in the Control group (CoV = 13.31 %). Even though similar Sw, LoA and ICC values were observed in both groups (Sw = 2.55 s and 2.34 s; LoA = -6.60 to 5.18 s and -4.82 to 6.51 s, Control and DED respectively, ICCs > 0.95). Interobserver reproducibility indicated a moderate amount of variability with CoV ≤ 15.01 % recorded in both groups. Agreement between the two devices was poor. Limits of agreement were not clinically acceptable for TMH (LoA = -0.19 to 0.14 mm and -0.16 to 0.13 mm, Control and DED, respectively) and for NIBUT (LoA = -12.74 to 14.08 s and -12.19 to 12.87 s, Control and DED, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICP Tearscope provides TMH and NIBUT measurements that show weak repeatability and moderate interobserver reproducibility. This device is not interchangeable with the Keratograph 5 M.</p>","PeriodicalId":49087,"journal":{"name":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","volume":" ","pages":"102333"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intrasession repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of ICP Tearscope measurements of tear meniscus height and non-invasive breakup time.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Rosa Barrio, Mariano González-Pérez, Pedro Arriola-Villalobos, Beatriz Antona\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clae.2024.102333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine intrasession repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of tear meniscus height (TMH) and non-invasive tear breakup time (NIBUT) measurements provided by ICP Tearscope, and their agreement with Keratograph 5 M measurements in persons with and without dry eye.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 48 individuals with dry eye disease (DED) and 44 healthy controls. To determine intrasession repeatability, two consecutive TMH and NIBUT measurements were carried out by a single experienced examiner using ICP Tearscope. For interobserver reproducibility, a second masked investigator measured TMH and NIBUT on the first image and video captured by the examiner. Keratograph 5 M measurements of both variables were carried out by the same examiner. Repeatability and reproducibility were evaluated through within-subject standard deviation (Sw), coefficient of variation (CoV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots (bias and limits of agreement (LoA)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TMH measurement with ICP Tearscope showed both, a moderate intrasession repeatability (Sw = 0.045, CoV < 19.82 %, ICC > 0.684) and interobserver reproducibility (Sw = 0.032, CoV < 14.09 %, ICC > 0.926). The NIBUT measurement showed worse intrasession repeatability in the DED group (CoV = 27.53 %) than in the Control group (CoV = 13.31 %). Even though similar Sw, LoA and ICC values were observed in both groups (Sw = 2.55 s and 2.34 s; LoA = -6.60 to 5.18 s and -4.82 to 6.51 s, Control and DED respectively, ICCs > 0.95). Interobserver reproducibility indicated a moderate amount of variability with CoV ≤ 15.01 % recorded in both groups. Agreement between the two devices was poor. Limits of agreement were not clinically acceptable for TMH (LoA = -0.19 to 0.14 mm and -0.16 to 0.13 mm, Control and DED, respectively) and for NIBUT (LoA = -12.74 to 14.08 s and -12.19 to 12.87 s, Control and DED, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICP Tearscope provides TMH and NIBUT measurements that show weak repeatability and moderate interobserver reproducibility. This device is not interchangeable with the Keratograph 5 M.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102333\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究泪液半月板高度(TMH)和无创泪液破裂时间(NIBUT)的测量结果在干眼症患者和非干眼症患者中的重复性和观察者间的再现性,以及它们与角膜塑形镜 5 M 测量结果的一致性:参与者包括 48 名干眼症 (DED) 患者和 44 名健康对照者。为了确定疗程内的重复性,由一名经验丰富的检查员使用 ICP 泪道镜连续进行两次 TMH 和 NIBUT 测量。为了确定观察者之间的可重复性,第二位蒙面调查员在检查员拍摄的第一张图像和视频上测量了 TMH 和 NIBUT。对这两个变量的角膜 5 M 测量由同一检查者进行。重复性和再现性通过受试者内标准偏差(Sw)、变异系数(CoV)、类内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman图(偏差和一致性界限(LoA))进行评估:使用 ICP Tearscope 进行的 TMH 测量显示出中等程度的会期内重复性(Sw = 0.045,CoV 0.684)和观察者间重复性(Sw = 0.032,CoV 0.926)。DED 组(CoV = 27.53 %)的 NIBUT 测量显示出比对照组(CoV = 13.31 %)更差的区段内重复性。尽管两组观察到相似的 Sw、LoA 和 ICC 值(Sw = 2.55 秒和 2.34 秒;LoA = -6.60 至 5.18 秒和 -4.82 至 6.51 秒,对照组和 DED 组,ICC > 0.95)。观察者之间的再现性显示出中等程度的变异性,两组的 CoV ≤ 15.01%。两种设备之间的一致性较差。在临床上,TMH(LoA = -0.19 至 0.14 mm,对照组和 DED 分别为 -0.16 至 0.13 mm)和 NIBUT(LoA = -12.74 至 14.08 s,对照组和 DED 分别为 -12.19 至 12.87 s)的一致性不合格:ICP Tearscope 提供的 TMH 和 NIBUT 测量结果显示出较低的重复性和中等程度的观察者间重复性。该设备不能与 Keratograph 5 M 互换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intrasession repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of ICP Tearscope measurements of tear meniscus height and non-invasive breakup time.

Purpose: To examine intrasession repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of tear meniscus height (TMH) and non-invasive tear breakup time (NIBUT) measurements provided by ICP Tearscope, and their agreement with Keratograph 5 M measurements in persons with and without dry eye.

Methods: Participants were 48 individuals with dry eye disease (DED) and 44 healthy controls. To determine intrasession repeatability, two consecutive TMH and NIBUT measurements were carried out by a single experienced examiner using ICP Tearscope. For interobserver reproducibility, a second masked investigator measured TMH and NIBUT on the first image and video captured by the examiner. Keratograph 5 M measurements of both variables were carried out by the same examiner. Repeatability and reproducibility were evaluated through within-subject standard deviation (Sw), coefficient of variation (CoV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots (bias and limits of agreement (LoA)).

Results: The TMH measurement with ICP Tearscope showed both, a moderate intrasession repeatability (Sw = 0.045, CoV < 19.82 %, ICC > 0.684) and interobserver reproducibility (Sw = 0.032, CoV < 14.09 %, ICC > 0.926). The NIBUT measurement showed worse intrasession repeatability in the DED group (CoV = 27.53 %) than in the Control group (CoV = 13.31 %). Even though similar Sw, LoA and ICC values were observed in both groups (Sw = 2.55 s and 2.34 s; LoA = -6.60 to 5.18 s and -4.82 to 6.51 s, Control and DED respectively, ICCs > 0.95). Interobserver reproducibility indicated a moderate amount of variability with CoV ≤ 15.01 % recorded in both groups. Agreement between the two devices was poor. Limits of agreement were not clinically acceptable for TMH (LoA = -0.19 to 0.14 mm and -0.16 to 0.13 mm, Control and DED, respectively) and for NIBUT (LoA = -12.74 to 14.08 s and -12.19 to 12.87 s, Control and DED, respectively).

Conclusions: ICP Tearscope provides TMH and NIBUT measurements that show weak repeatability and moderate interobserver reproducibility. This device is not interchangeable with the Keratograph 5 M.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
198
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Contact Lens & Anterior Eye is a research-based journal covering all aspects of contact lens theory and practice, including original articles on invention and innovations, as well as the regular features of: Case Reports; Literary Reviews; Editorials; Instrumentation and Techniques and Dates of Professional Meetings.
期刊最新文献
Validation and repeatability assessment of the Chinese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), 5-item dry eye (DEQ-5), and contact lens dry eye questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8) questionnaires. Artificial intelligence-assisted fitting method using corneal topography outcomes enhances success rate in orthokeratology lens fitting. Randomised controlled trial on effects of topical insulin compared to artificial tears and normal saline on tear inflammatory mediator levels and clinical parameters in diabetics with dry eye disease. Development and evaluation of ocular antibiotic-loaded soluble film inserts. Digital eye strain and clinical correlates in older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1