Juliette A. Miller , Russ Palmer, Beth Bryles Phillips, Michael Fulford, Rebecca H. Stone, Blake R. Johnson, Devin Lavender
{"title":"及格/不及格评分与字母评分对药学院学生成就目标取向的影响。","authors":"Juliette A. Miller , Russ Palmer, Beth Bryles Phillips, Michael Fulford, Rebecca H. Stone, Blake R. Johnson, Devin Lavender","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In the Fall of 2021, the grading scale for a pharmacotherapy case-based series of recitations in a pharmacy practice course was modified from a letter grade format to a pass/fail format. The aim of this study was to assess how different formats of grading affected pharmacy students' achievement goal orientations based on the 2 × 2 conceptual framework developed by Eliot and Harackiewicz (i.e. performance-approach, performance-avoidance, mastery-approach, mastery-avoidance).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Second-year pharmacy students who completed recitations in a pass/fail format and third-year students who completed recitations in a letter grade format received a questionnaire containing a Likert instrument (the Achievement Goal Questionnaire-Revised) that was previously validated and designed to evaluate students' achievement goal orientations along four different sub-scales. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were compared, and appropriate statistics were applied to the demographic information and questionnaire results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Questionnaires were completed by 99 % (<em>n</em> = 268) of pharmacy students (132 second-year students and 136 third-year students). There were higher mean scores for mastery-approach (4.7 v. 4.2; <em>P</em> < .001), mastery-avoidance (3.7 v. 3.4; <em>P</em> = .006), performance-approach (4.3 v. 3.9; <em>P</em> < .001), and performance-avoidance (4.1 v. 3.8; <em>P</em> = .010) for the second-year (pass/fail) students compared with third-year (letter grade) students.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Second-year pharmacy students who took a case-based series of recitations with a pass/fail grading scale had higher mean scores for each of the sub-scales within Eliot and Harackiewicz's 2 × 2 goal orientation framework compared with third-year pharmacy students who took the recitations in a letter grade format. Using the study results along with current literature on goal orientation theory, it may be beneficial to pharmacy students in courses with both pass/fail and letter grade formats for educators to encourage approach goal orientations while discouraging avoidance goal orientations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of pass/fail grading vs. letter grading on pharmacy students' achievement goal orientations\",\"authors\":\"Juliette A. Miller , Russ Palmer, Beth Bryles Phillips, Michael Fulford, Rebecca H. Stone, Blake R. Johnson, Devin Lavender\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In the Fall of 2021, the grading scale for a pharmacotherapy case-based series of recitations in a pharmacy practice course was modified from a letter grade format to a pass/fail format. The aim of this study was to assess how different formats of grading affected pharmacy students' achievement goal orientations based on the 2 × 2 conceptual framework developed by Eliot and Harackiewicz (i.e. performance-approach, performance-avoidance, mastery-approach, mastery-avoidance).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Second-year pharmacy students who completed recitations in a pass/fail format and third-year students who completed recitations in a letter grade format received a questionnaire containing a Likert instrument (the Achievement Goal Questionnaire-Revised) that was previously validated and designed to evaluate students' achievement goal orientations along four different sub-scales. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were compared, and appropriate statistics were applied to the demographic information and questionnaire results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Questionnaires were completed by 99 % (<em>n</em> = 268) of pharmacy students (132 second-year students and 136 third-year students). There were higher mean scores for mastery-approach (4.7 v. 4.2; <em>P</em> < .001), mastery-avoidance (3.7 v. 3.4; <em>P</em> = .006), performance-approach (4.3 v. 3.9; <em>P</em> < .001), and performance-avoidance (4.1 v. 3.8; <em>P</em> = .010) for the second-year (pass/fail) students compared with third-year (letter grade) students.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Second-year pharmacy students who took a case-based series of recitations with a pass/fail grading scale had higher mean scores for each of the sub-scales within Eliot and Harackiewicz's 2 × 2 goal orientation framework compared with third-year pharmacy students who took the recitations in a letter grade format. Using the study results along with current literature on goal orientation theory, it may be beneficial to pharmacy students in courses with both pass/fail and letter grade formats for educators to encourage approach goal orientations while discouraging avoidance goal orientations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 102200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724002326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724002326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of pass/fail grading vs. letter grading on pharmacy students' achievement goal orientations
Introduction
In the Fall of 2021, the grading scale for a pharmacotherapy case-based series of recitations in a pharmacy practice course was modified from a letter grade format to a pass/fail format. The aim of this study was to assess how different formats of grading affected pharmacy students' achievement goal orientations based on the 2 × 2 conceptual framework developed by Eliot and Harackiewicz (i.e. performance-approach, performance-avoidance, mastery-approach, mastery-avoidance).
Methods
Second-year pharmacy students who completed recitations in a pass/fail format and third-year students who completed recitations in a letter grade format received a questionnaire containing a Likert instrument (the Achievement Goal Questionnaire-Revised) that was previously validated and designed to evaluate students' achievement goal orientations along four different sub-scales. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were compared, and appropriate statistics were applied to the demographic information and questionnaire results.
Results
Questionnaires were completed by 99 % (n = 268) of pharmacy students (132 second-year students and 136 third-year students). There were higher mean scores for mastery-approach (4.7 v. 4.2; P < .001), mastery-avoidance (3.7 v. 3.4; P = .006), performance-approach (4.3 v. 3.9; P < .001), and performance-avoidance (4.1 v. 3.8; P = .010) for the second-year (pass/fail) students compared with third-year (letter grade) students.
Conclusions
Second-year pharmacy students who took a case-based series of recitations with a pass/fail grading scale had higher mean scores for each of the sub-scales within Eliot and Harackiewicz's 2 × 2 goal orientation framework compared with third-year pharmacy students who took the recitations in a letter grade format. Using the study results along with current literature on goal orientation theory, it may be beneficial to pharmacy students in courses with both pass/fail and letter grade formats for educators to encourage approach goal orientations while discouraging avoidance goal orientations.