{"title":"利用机器学习从放射学特征预测胶质瘤中的IDH和ATRX突变:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Chor Yiu Chloe Chung, Laura Elin Pigott","doi":"10.3389/fradi.2024.1493824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to evaluate the quality and accuracy of ML algorithms in predicting ATRX and IDH mutation status in patients with glioma through the analysis of radiomic features extracted from medical imaging. The potential clinical impacts and areas for further improvement in non-invasive glioma diagnosis, classification and prognosis are also identified and discussed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic and Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) statement. Databases including PubMed, Science Direct, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, Medline, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to April 2024. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability concerns. Additionally, meta-regression identified covariates contributing to heterogeneity before a subgroup meta-analysis was conducted. Pooled sensitivities, specificities and area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated for the prediction of ATRX and IDH mutations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies involving 1,685 patients with grade I-IV glioma were included. Primary contributors to heterogeneity included the MRI modalities utilised (conventional only vs. combined) and the types of ML models employed. The meta-analysis revealed pooled sensitivities of 0.682 for prediction of ATRX loss and 0.831 for IDH mutations, specificities of 0.874 and 0.828, and AUC values of 0.842 and 0.948, respectively. Interestingly, incorporating semantics and clinical data, including patient demographics, improved the diagnostic performance of ML models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high AUC in the prediction of both mutations demonstrates an overall robust diagnostic performance of ML, indicating the potential for accurate, non-invasive diagnosis and precise prognosis. Future research should focus on integrating diverse data types, including advanced imaging, semantics and clinical data while also aiming to standardise the collection and integration of multimodal data. This approach will enhance clinical applicability and consistency.</p>","PeriodicalId":73101,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in radiology","volume":"4 ","pages":"1493824"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting IDH and ATRX mutations in gliomas from radiomic features with machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chor Yiu Chloe Chung, Laura Elin Pigott\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fradi.2024.1493824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to evaluate the quality and accuracy of ML algorithms in predicting ATRX and IDH mutation status in patients with glioma through the analysis of radiomic features extracted from medical imaging. The potential clinical impacts and areas for further improvement in non-invasive glioma diagnosis, classification and prognosis are also identified and discussed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic and Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) statement. Databases including PubMed, Science Direct, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, Medline, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to April 2024. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability concerns. Additionally, meta-regression identified covariates contributing to heterogeneity before a subgroup meta-analysis was conducted. Pooled sensitivities, specificities and area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated for the prediction of ATRX and IDH mutations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies involving 1,685 patients with grade I-IV glioma were included. Primary contributors to heterogeneity included the MRI modalities utilised (conventional only vs. combined) and the types of ML models employed. The meta-analysis revealed pooled sensitivities of 0.682 for prediction of ATRX loss and 0.831 for IDH mutations, specificities of 0.874 and 0.828, and AUC values of 0.842 and 0.948, respectively. Interestingly, incorporating semantics and clinical data, including patient demographics, improved the diagnostic performance of ML models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high AUC in the prediction of both mutations demonstrates an overall robust diagnostic performance of ML, indicating the potential for accurate, non-invasive diagnosis and precise prognosis. Future research should focus on integrating diverse data types, including advanced imaging, semantics and clinical data while also aiming to standardise the collection and integration of multimodal data. This approach will enhance clinical applicability and consistency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in radiology\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"1493824\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560782/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2024.1493824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2024.1493824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本系统综述旨在通过分析从医学影像中提取的放射学特征,评估ML算法在预测胶质瘤患者ATRX和IDH突变状态方面的质量和准确性。此外,还确定并讨论了在非侵入性胶质瘤诊断、分类和预后方面的潜在临床影响和有待进一步改进的领域:综述遵循诊断和测试准确性系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA-DTA)声明。检索了从开始到 2024 年 4 月的数据库,包括 PubMed、Science Direct、CINAHL、Academic Search Complete、Medline 和 Google Scholar。诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)工具用于评估偏倚风险和适用性问题。此外,在进行亚组荟萃分析之前,元回归确定了导致异质性的协变量。计算了预测ATRX和IDH突变的汇总敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)值:结果:共纳入了11项研究,涉及1685名I-IV级胶质瘤患者。导致异质性的主要因素包括所采用的 MRI 模式(仅常规模式与联合模式)和所采用的 ML 模型类型。荟萃分析显示,预测 ATRX 缺失的汇总灵敏度为 0.682,预测 IDH 突变的汇总灵敏度为 0.831,特异性分别为 0.874 和 0.828,AUC 值分别为 0.842 和 0.948。有趣的是,结合语义和临床数据(包括患者人口统计学数据)提高了 ML 模型的诊断性能:结论:两种突变预测的 AUC 值都很高,这表明 ML 的整体诊断性能很强,具有准确、无创诊断和精确预后的潜力。未来的研究应侧重于整合不同的数据类型,包括先进的成像、语义和临床数据,同时还应将多模态数据的收集和整合标准化。这种方法将提高临床适用性和一致性。
Predicting IDH and ATRX mutations in gliomas from radiomic features with machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the quality and accuracy of ML algorithms in predicting ATRX and IDH mutation status in patients with glioma through the analysis of radiomic features extracted from medical imaging. The potential clinical impacts and areas for further improvement in non-invasive glioma diagnosis, classification and prognosis are also identified and discussed.
Methods: The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic and Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) statement. Databases including PubMed, Science Direct, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, Medline, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to April 2024. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability concerns. Additionally, meta-regression identified covariates contributing to heterogeneity before a subgroup meta-analysis was conducted. Pooled sensitivities, specificities and area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated for the prediction of ATRX and IDH mutations.
Results: Eleven studies involving 1,685 patients with grade I-IV glioma were included. Primary contributors to heterogeneity included the MRI modalities utilised (conventional only vs. combined) and the types of ML models employed. The meta-analysis revealed pooled sensitivities of 0.682 for prediction of ATRX loss and 0.831 for IDH mutations, specificities of 0.874 and 0.828, and AUC values of 0.842 and 0.948, respectively. Interestingly, incorporating semantics and clinical data, including patient demographics, improved the diagnostic performance of ML models.
Conclusions: The high AUC in the prediction of both mutations demonstrates an overall robust diagnostic performance of ML, indicating the potential for accurate, non-invasive diagnosis and precise prognosis. Future research should focus on integrating diverse data types, including advanced imaging, semantics and clinical data while also aiming to standardise the collection and integration of multimodal data. This approach will enhance clinical applicability and consistency.