Ji Ke, Fangfang Liu, Wei Yang, Ruiping Xu, Lei Chen, Wenlei Yang, Yu He, Zhen Liu, Bolin Hou, Liqun Zhang, Miaoping Lin, Lixin Zhang, Fan Zhang, Fen Cai, Huawen Xu, Mengfei Liu, Ying Liu, Yaqi Pan, Zhonghu He, Yang Ke
{"title":"社区预防和标准化临床治疗共同改善癌症预后:食道癌患者队列研究的现实证据。","authors":"Ji Ke, Fangfang Liu, Wei Yang, Ruiping Xu, Lei Chen, Wenlei Yang, Yu He, Zhen Liu, Bolin Hou, Liqun Zhang, Miaoping Lin, Lixin Zhang, Fan Zhang, Fen Cai, Huawen Xu, Mengfei Liu, Ying Liu, Yaqi Pan, Zhonghu He, Yang Ke","doi":"10.1016/j.scib.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extensive efforts have been put into reducing the heavy burden of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in China. However, the joint impact of prevention and treatment on the long-term overall survival (OS) of ESCC patients remains largely unknown. We consecutively recruited 13,255 ESCC patients from two Chinese centers: the Northern center, located in a high-risk area with abundant screening programs; and the Southern center, situated in a non-high-risk area with improved clinical practices. Inter-center comparison, longitudinal intra-center comparison, and a simulation analysis were conducted to investigate the influence of tumor downstaging and high-quality clinical treatment on OS. During a follow-up period of 12.52 years, the Northern center exhibited higher median survival than the Southern center (6.22 vs. 3.15 years; HR<sub>adjusted</sub> = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.69-0.77). Mediation analysis demonstrated that its OS advantage was largely (77.7%) attributed to earlier TNM stage (stage 0-II: 51.3% vs. 24.6%). In temporal analyses, patient survival in the Southern center gradually improved (median survival during 2015-2018 vs. 2009-2014: 3.58 vs. 2.93 years; HR<sub>adjusted</sub> = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.79-0.94), coinciding with the progress of treatment-related indices (completeness of TNM staging in discharge diagnosis [from 53.7% to 99.6%], adoption of minimally invasive esophagectomy [from 0.0% to 51.1%] and right thoracic esophagectomy [from 12.4% to 86.4%], etc.). Simulation analysis further demonstrated that integrating both downstaging and high-quality treatment would lead to the best survival. Tumor downstaging and high-quality clinical treatment have a joint impact on ESCC patient survival. Establishing a comprehensive strategy that integrates cancer prevention with optimal clinical treatment is crucial for alleviating the ESCC burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":421,"journal":{"name":"Science Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":18.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community prevention and standardized clinical treatment jointly improve cancer outcome: Real-world evidence from an esophageal cancer patient cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Ji Ke, Fangfang Liu, Wei Yang, Ruiping Xu, Lei Chen, Wenlei Yang, Yu He, Zhen Liu, Bolin Hou, Liqun Zhang, Miaoping Lin, Lixin Zhang, Fan Zhang, Fen Cai, Huawen Xu, Mengfei Liu, Ying Liu, Yaqi Pan, Zhonghu He, Yang Ke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scib.2024.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Extensive efforts have been put into reducing the heavy burden of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in China. However, the joint impact of prevention and treatment on the long-term overall survival (OS) of ESCC patients remains largely unknown. We consecutively recruited 13,255 ESCC patients from two Chinese centers: the Northern center, located in a high-risk area with abundant screening programs; and the Southern center, situated in a non-high-risk area with improved clinical practices. Inter-center comparison, longitudinal intra-center comparison, and a simulation analysis were conducted to investigate the influence of tumor downstaging and high-quality clinical treatment on OS. During a follow-up period of 12.52 years, the Northern center exhibited higher median survival than the Southern center (6.22 vs. 3.15 years; HR<sub>adjusted</sub> = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.69-0.77). Mediation analysis demonstrated that its OS advantage was largely (77.7%) attributed to earlier TNM stage (stage 0-II: 51.3% vs. 24.6%). In temporal analyses, patient survival in the Southern center gradually improved (median survival during 2015-2018 vs. 2009-2014: 3.58 vs. 2.93 years; HR<sub>adjusted</sub> = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.79-0.94), coinciding with the progress of treatment-related indices (completeness of TNM staging in discharge diagnosis [from 53.7% to 99.6%], adoption of minimally invasive esophagectomy [from 0.0% to 51.1%] and right thoracic esophagectomy [from 12.4% to 86.4%], etc.). Simulation analysis further demonstrated that integrating both downstaging and high-quality treatment would lead to the best survival. Tumor downstaging and high-quality clinical treatment have a joint impact on ESCC patient survival. Establishing a comprehensive strategy that integrates cancer prevention with optimal clinical treatment is crucial for alleviating the ESCC burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Bulletin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":18.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2024.11.005\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2024.11.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
中国为减轻食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的沉重负担做出了巨大努力。然而,预防和治疗对食管鳞癌患者长期总生存(OS)的共同影响在很大程度上仍是未知数。我们在中国的两个中心连续招募了13255名ESCC患者:北方中心位于高风险地区,筛查项目丰富;南方中心位于非高风险地区,临床实践完善。通过中心间比较、中心内纵向比较和模拟分析,研究了肿瘤降期和高质量临床治疗对OS的影响。在12.52年的随访期间,北方中心的中位生存期高于南方中心(6.22年对3.15年;HRadjusted = 0.73,95% CI:0.69-0.77)。中介分析表明,北方中心的 OS 优势主要(77.7%)归因于 TNM 分期较早(0-II 期:51.3% 对 24.6%)。在时间分析中,南方中心的患者生存率逐渐提高(2015-2018年的中位生存率与2009-2014年的中位生存率相比:3.58 vs. 2.93):3.58年 vs. 2.93年;HRadjusted = 0.86,95% CI:0.79-0.94),与治疗相关指标的进步相吻合(出院诊断中TNM分期的完整性[从53.7%到99.6%]、采用微创食管切除术[从0.0%到51.1%]和右胸食管切除术[从12.4%到86.4%]等)。模拟分析进一步证明,将肿瘤下行分期和高质量治疗结合起来可获得最佳生存率。肿瘤降期和高质量的临床治疗对 ESCC 患者的生存有共同的影响。建立癌症预防与最佳临床治疗相结合的综合策略对于减轻 ESCC 负担至关重要。
Community prevention and standardized clinical treatment jointly improve cancer outcome: Real-world evidence from an esophageal cancer patient cohort study.
Extensive efforts have been put into reducing the heavy burden of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in China. However, the joint impact of prevention and treatment on the long-term overall survival (OS) of ESCC patients remains largely unknown. We consecutively recruited 13,255 ESCC patients from two Chinese centers: the Northern center, located in a high-risk area with abundant screening programs; and the Southern center, situated in a non-high-risk area with improved clinical practices. Inter-center comparison, longitudinal intra-center comparison, and a simulation analysis were conducted to investigate the influence of tumor downstaging and high-quality clinical treatment on OS. During a follow-up period of 12.52 years, the Northern center exhibited higher median survival than the Southern center (6.22 vs. 3.15 years; HRadjusted = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.69-0.77). Mediation analysis demonstrated that its OS advantage was largely (77.7%) attributed to earlier TNM stage (stage 0-II: 51.3% vs. 24.6%). In temporal analyses, patient survival in the Southern center gradually improved (median survival during 2015-2018 vs. 2009-2014: 3.58 vs. 2.93 years; HRadjusted = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.79-0.94), coinciding with the progress of treatment-related indices (completeness of TNM staging in discharge diagnosis [from 53.7% to 99.6%], adoption of minimally invasive esophagectomy [from 0.0% to 51.1%] and right thoracic esophagectomy [from 12.4% to 86.4%], etc.). Simulation analysis further demonstrated that integrating both downstaging and high-quality treatment would lead to the best survival. Tumor downstaging and high-quality clinical treatment have a joint impact on ESCC patient survival. Establishing a comprehensive strategy that integrates cancer prevention with optimal clinical treatment is crucial for alleviating the ESCC burden.
期刊介绍:
Science Bulletin (Sci. Bull., formerly known as Chinese Science Bulletin) is a multidisciplinary academic journal supervised by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and co-sponsored by the CAS and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC). Sci. Bull. is a semi-monthly international journal publishing high-caliber peer-reviewed research on a broad range of natural sciences and high-tech fields on the basis of its originality, scientific significance and whether it is of general interest. In addition, we are committed to serving the scientific community with immediate, authoritative news and valuable insights into upcoming trends around the globe.