衡量旁观者的可能性、障碍和预防大学生酗酒的行动的因子结构。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of American College Health Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1080/07448481.2024.2418534
Erika Montanaro, Annelise Mennicke, Alyssa McGonagle, Jessamyn Moxie, Erin A Meehan, Bridget N Jules, Jasmine Temple, Michael J Brienzo, Madi Williams, Anna Yoder, Hannah Carlson, Gabrielle Haley, Chris Correia, Sarah McMahon
{"title":"衡量旁观者的可能性、障碍和预防大学生酗酒的行动的因子结构。","authors":"Erika Montanaro, Annelise Mennicke, Alyssa McGonagle, Jessamyn Moxie, Erin A Meehan, Bridget N Jules, Jasmine Temple, Michael J Brienzo, Madi Williams, Anna Yoder, Hannah Carlson, Gabrielle Haley, Chris Correia, Sarah McMahon","doi":"10.1080/07448481.2024.2418534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are currently no adequate measures to assess bystander intervention for problematic alcohol use (PAU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed initial measures of bystander intervention for PAU, that include the constructs of likelihood to intervene, barriers to intervention, and actions taken in response to PAU situation. We sought to confirm the factor structure of the initial measures using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We administered the measures in a college student sample (<i>N</i> = 1,270) recruited through Prime Panels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CFA analysis resulted in the following two scales: 1) Bystander Alcohol Likelihood to Intervene (14 items), 2) Overcoming Bystander Alcohol Barriers to Intervene (22 items). The Bystander Alcohol Actions (22 items) was formative, no CFA was conducted. We found that the hypothesized model displayed significantly superior fit to all other models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These measures can be used to inform bystander intervention programs for PAU and as tools to evaluate bystander intervention programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of American College Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factor structure for measures of bystander likelihood, barriers, and actions to prevent problematic alcohol use among college students.\",\"authors\":\"Erika Montanaro, Annelise Mennicke, Alyssa McGonagle, Jessamyn Moxie, Erin A Meehan, Bridget N Jules, Jasmine Temple, Michael J Brienzo, Madi Williams, Anna Yoder, Hannah Carlson, Gabrielle Haley, Chris Correia, Sarah McMahon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07448481.2024.2418534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are currently no adequate measures to assess bystander intervention for problematic alcohol use (PAU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed initial measures of bystander intervention for PAU, that include the constructs of likelihood to intervene, barriers to intervention, and actions taken in response to PAU situation. We sought to confirm the factor structure of the initial measures using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We administered the measures in a college student sample (<i>N</i> = 1,270) recruited through Prime Panels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CFA analysis resulted in the following two scales: 1) Bystander Alcohol Likelihood to Intervene (14 items), 2) Overcoming Bystander Alcohol Barriers to Intervene (22 items). The Bystander Alcohol Actions (22 items) was formative, no CFA was conducted. We found that the hypothesized model displayed significantly superior fit to all other models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These measures can be used to inform bystander intervention programs for PAU and as tools to evaluate bystander intervention programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of American College Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of American College Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2024.2418534\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of American College Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2024.2418534","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前还没有适当的措施来评估旁观者对问题性饮酒(PAU)的干预:目前还没有适当的方法来评估旁观者对问题性饮酒(PAU)的干预:我们开发了针对 PAU 的旁观者干预的初步测量方法,其中包括干预的可能性、干预的障碍以及针对 PAU 情况采取的行动。我们试图通过确证因子分析(CFA)来确认初始测量的因子结构:我们对通过 Prime Panels 招募的大学生样本(N=1,270)进行了测量:CFA分析得出以下两个量表:1)旁观者酒精干预可能性(14个项目);2)克服旁观者酒精干预障碍(22个项目)。旁观者酒精行动(22 个项目)是形成性的,没有进行 CFA。我们发现,假设模型的拟合度明显优于所有其他模型:这些测量方法可用于为 PAU 的旁观者干预计划提供信息,也可作为评估旁观者干预计划的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factor structure for measures of bystander likelihood, barriers, and actions to prevent problematic alcohol use among college students.

Objective: There are currently no adequate measures to assess bystander intervention for problematic alcohol use (PAU).

Methods: We developed initial measures of bystander intervention for PAU, that include the constructs of likelihood to intervene, barriers to intervention, and actions taken in response to PAU situation. We sought to confirm the factor structure of the initial measures using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

Participants: We administered the measures in a college student sample (N = 1,270) recruited through Prime Panels.

Results: CFA analysis resulted in the following two scales: 1) Bystander Alcohol Likelihood to Intervene (14 items), 2) Overcoming Bystander Alcohol Barriers to Intervene (22 items). The Bystander Alcohol Actions (22 items) was formative, no CFA was conducted. We found that the hypothesized model displayed significantly superior fit to all other models.

Conclusion: These measures can be used to inform bystander intervention programs for PAU and as tools to evaluate bystander intervention programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
388
期刊介绍: Binge drinking, campus violence, eating disorders, sexual harassment: Today"s college students face challenges their parents never imagined. The Journal of American College Health, the only scholarly publication devoted entirely to college students" health, focuses on these issues, as well as use of tobacco and other drugs, sexual habits, psychological problems, and guns on campus, as well as the students... Published in cooperation with the American College Health Association, the Journal of American College Health is a must read for physicians, nurses, health educators, and administrators who are involved with students every day.
期刊最新文献
A cross-sectional comparison of the association between self-reported sources of stress and psychological distress among Canadian undergraduate and graduate students. Examining resources to promote sexual health and address sexual violence at community colleges across the United States: a qualitative study. Polyvictimization and academic performance among college students: Examining differences across sexual and gender identity. The lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the basic-needs security and mental health on a sample of college students. Awareness, knowledge, and willingness to take PrEP among Black students attending Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Serving Institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1