{"title":"以能力为基础的医学教育指南是基于具体情况的:从五个国家的国家指导方针中汲取的经验教训。","authors":"Yasushi Matsuyama, Osamu Nomura, Sayaka Oikawa, Makoto Kikukawa, Ikuo Shimizu, Harumi Gomi","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2351215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The global shift towards competency-based medical education (CBME) has led to the development of national guidelines for CBME implementation (CBME Guides). The characteristics of CBME Guides from CBME-developed countries were analysed to inform the revision process for the CBME Guide in Japan, a CBME-developing country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Document analysis of CBME Guides from Canada, Singapore, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States was conducted by six Japanese medical education experts. The process of analysing the CBME Guides was also reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the CBME Guides contain many commonalities in structure and content, there is variation in terminology and forms of expression. The characteristics vary according to national systems, culture, and customs. The content of the Guides may have changed depending on the publication date, in line with changes in medical technology, medical needs, and advances in the understanding of CBME.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analysing CBME Guides from CBME-developed countries may lead to more meaningful revisions to a CBME-developing country's guide, enabling it to be better aligned with the local, social, cultural, and historical context of the country now and in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":"46 sup1","pages":"S38-S45"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competency-based medical education guidelines are context-based: Lessons from national guidelines in five countries.\",\"authors\":\"Yasushi Matsuyama, Osamu Nomura, Sayaka Oikawa, Makoto Kikukawa, Ikuo Shimizu, Harumi Gomi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2351215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The global shift towards competency-based medical education (CBME) has led to the development of national guidelines for CBME implementation (CBME Guides). The characteristics of CBME Guides from CBME-developed countries were analysed to inform the revision process for the CBME Guide in Japan, a CBME-developing country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Document analysis of CBME Guides from Canada, Singapore, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States was conducted by six Japanese medical education experts. The process of analysing the CBME Guides was also reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the CBME Guides contain many commonalities in structure and content, there is variation in terminology and forms of expression. The characteristics vary according to national systems, culture, and customs. The content of the Guides may have changed depending on the publication date, in line with changes in medical technology, medical needs, and advances in the understanding of CBME.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analysing CBME Guides from CBME-developed countries may lead to more meaningful revisions to a CBME-developing country's guide, enabling it to be better aligned with the local, social, cultural, and historical context of the country now and in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"volume\":\"46 sup1\",\"pages\":\"S38-S45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2351215\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2351215","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Competency-based medical education guidelines are context-based: Lessons from national guidelines in five countries.
Background and objectives: The global shift towards competency-based medical education (CBME) has led to the development of national guidelines for CBME implementation (CBME Guides). The characteristics of CBME Guides from CBME-developed countries were analysed to inform the revision process for the CBME Guide in Japan, a CBME-developing country.
Methods: Document analysis of CBME Guides from Canada, Singapore, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States was conducted by six Japanese medical education experts. The process of analysing the CBME Guides was also reviewed.
Results: While the CBME Guides contain many commonalities in structure and content, there is variation in terminology and forms of expression. The characteristics vary according to national systems, culture, and customs. The content of the Guides may have changed depending on the publication date, in line with changes in medical technology, medical needs, and advances in the understanding of CBME.
Conclusions: Analysing CBME Guides from CBME-developed countries may lead to more meaningful revisions to a CBME-developing country's guide, enabling it to be better aligned with the local, social, cultural, and historical context of the country now and in the future.
期刊介绍:
Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.