{"title":"粪便微生物群移植与万古霉素单药治疗早期艰难梭菌感染的成本效益比较:随机对照试验的经济评估。","authors":"C.R. Birch , S.E. Paaske , M.B. Jensen , S.M.D. Baunwall , L.H. Ehlers , C.L. Hvas","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>For <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> infection (CDI), faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is currently recommended for patients with three or more CDI episodes. A recent randomised controlled trial (RCT) show that FMT may be considered early, defined as intervention during the first or second CDI episode.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The aim was to investigate hospital costs of FMT as a complementary treatment compared with current standard care in patients with first or second CDI.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Compared with standard care for first or second CDI, patients randomised to FMT had €1,645 lower hospital costs over 26 weeks owing to fewer admissions and hospital contacts and less medication use. In the sensitivity analyses, FMT remained cost-effective as long as the treatment cost of FMT stayed below approximately €1,572 per component, corresponding to a total cost of FMT treatment (two components) of €3,144.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>FMT was cost-effective with both lower costs and greater effectiveness than current standard care involving vancomycin monotherapy. The findings were robust to sensivity analyses, with a threshold cost for one FMT treatment consisting of two components of €3,144.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"155 ","pages":"Pages 145-149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness of faecal microbiota transplantation compared with vancomycin monotherapy for early Clostridioides difficile infection: economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"C.R. Birch , S.E. Paaske , M.B. Jensen , S.M.D. Baunwall , L.H. Ehlers , C.L. Hvas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>For <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> infection (CDI), faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is currently recommended for patients with three or more CDI episodes. A recent randomised controlled trial (RCT) show that FMT may be considered early, defined as intervention during the first or second CDI episode.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The aim was to investigate hospital costs of FMT as a complementary treatment compared with current standard care in patients with first or second CDI.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Compared with standard care for first or second CDI, patients randomised to FMT had €1,645 lower hospital costs over 26 weeks owing to fewer admissions and hospital contacts and less medication use. In the sensitivity analyses, FMT remained cost-effective as long as the treatment cost of FMT stayed below approximately €1,572 per component, corresponding to a total cost of FMT treatment (two components) of €3,144.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>FMT was cost-effective with both lower costs and greater effectiveness than current standard care involving vancomycin monotherapy. The findings were robust to sensivity analyses, with a threshold cost for one FMT treatment consisting of two components of €3,144.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\"155 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 145-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124003724\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124003724","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cost-effectiveness of faecal microbiota transplantation compared with vancomycin monotherapy for early Clostridioides difficile infection: economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial
Background
For Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is currently recommended for patients with three or more CDI episodes. A recent randomised controlled trial (RCT) show that FMT may be considered early, defined as intervention during the first or second CDI episode.
Aim
The aim was to investigate hospital costs of FMT as a complementary treatment compared with current standard care in patients with first or second CDI.
Findings
Compared with standard care for first or second CDI, patients randomised to FMT had €1,645 lower hospital costs over 26 weeks owing to fewer admissions and hospital contacts and less medication use. In the sensitivity analyses, FMT remained cost-effective as long as the treatment cost of FMT stayed below approximately €1,572 per component, corresponding to a total cost of FMT treatment (two components) of €3,144.
Conclusion
FMT was cost-effective with both lower costs and greater effectiveness than current standard care involving vancomycin monotherapy. The findings were robust to sensivity analyses, with a threshold cost for one FMT treatment consisting of two components of €3,144.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.