{"title":"金钱是否会激励未来的寄养父母?高收入城镇与低收入城镇的反应是否不同?来自谷歌广告的证据","authors":"Subroto Roy, Jayanti Roy","doi":"10.1002/car.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recruiting foster parents is a worldwide challenge. In the US, foster parents are supposed to volunteer but receive stipends to cover the cost of foster children. Thus, Foster Care agencies hesitate to highlight the Stipend in their recruitment messaging to prospective foster parents. This hesitation is to weed out extrinsically (stipend) motivated prospective parents early in the application, training and licensing process.</p><p>The first step in foster parent recruitment is to start the conversation between prospective foster care parents and foster parent recruiters.</p><p>Extant research has relied on <i>current or former</i> foster parents to find their motivations for fostering and continuing to foster. We believe ours is the first study to empirically examine whether mentioning money (stipend) early in the recruitment process makes a difference in the response of <i>prospective</i> foster parents.</p><p>The research reports Google ads data from two foster parent recruitment campaigns. These Google search ads showed when “foster parenting” related words were Googled. One ad had the word “stipend,” and the other did not. We then examine differences in response between high and low-income towns. Next, we analysed differences in click behaviour over 207 days between the two versions of the ads. We then examined differences in click behaviour between residents of high and low-income towns. We used the <i>t</i>-test to test for differences in our data analysis approach.</p><p>We find no statistical difference in response between the ads that mention ‘stipend’ and those that do not (<i>t</i> = 0.64, <i>p</i> = 0.26). However, residents of low-income towns are five times more likely to click on a foster parent ad than residents from high-income towns, irrespective of whether the stipend is mentioned in the ad (without mentioning stipend: <i>t</i> = 3.21, <i>p</i> = 0.0008; mentioning Stipend: <i>t</i> = 3.77, <i>p</i> = 0.0001).</p>","PeriodicalId":47371,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse Review","volume":"33 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does money motivate prospective foster parents? Are responses from high vs. low-income towns different? Evidence from Google advertising\",\"authors\":\"Subroto Roy, Jayanti Roy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/car.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recruiting foster parents is a worldwide challenge. In the US, foster parents are supposed to volunteer but receive stipends to cover the cost of foster children. Thus, Foster Care agencies hesitate to highlight the Stipend in their recruitment messaging to prospective foster parents. This hesitation is to weed out extrinsically (stipend) motivated prospective parents early in the application, training and licensing process.</p><p>The first step in foster parent recruitment is to start the conversation between prospective foster care parents and foster parent recruiters.</p><p>Extant research has relied on <i>current or former</i> foster parents to find their motivations for fostering and continuing to foster. We believe ours is the first study to empirically examine whether mentioning money (stipend) early in the recruitment process makes a difference in the response of <i>prospective</i> foster parents.</p><p>The research reports Google ads data from two foster parent recruitment campaigns. These Google search ads showed when “foster parenting” related words were Googled. One ad had the word “stipend,” and the other did not. We then examine differences in response between high and low-income towns. Next, we analysed differences in click behaviour over 207 days between the two versions of the ads. We then examined differences in click behaviour between residents of high and low-income towns. We used the <i>t</i>-test to test for differences in our data analysis approach.</p><p>We find no statistical difference in response between the ads that mention ‘stipend’ and those that do not (<i>t</i> = 0.64, <i>p</i> = 0.26). However, residents of low-income towns are five times more likely to click on a foster parent ad than residents from high-income towns, irrespective of whether the stipend is mentioned in the ad (without mentioning stipend: <i>t</i> = 3.21, <i>p</i> = 0.0008; mentioning Stipend: <i>t</i> = 3.77, <i>p</i> = 0.0001).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Abuse Review\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Abuse Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/car.70003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/car.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does money motivate prospective foster parents? Are responses from high vs. low-income towns different? Evidence from Google advertising
Recruiting foster parents is a worldwide challenge. In the US, foster parents are supposed to volunteer but receive stipends to cover the cost of foster children. Thus, Foster Care agencies hesitate to highlight the Stipend in their recruitment messaging to prospective foster parents. This hesitation is to weed out extrinsically (stipend) motivated prospective parents early in the application, training and licensing process.
The first step in foster parent recruitment is to start the conversation between prospective foster care parents and foster parent recruiters.
Extant research has relied on current or former foster parents to find their motivations for fostering and continuing to foster. We believe ours is the first study to empirically examine whether mentioning money (stipend) early in the recruitment process makes a difference in the response of prospective foster parents.
The research reports Google ads data from two foster parent recruitment campaigns. These Google search ads showed when “foster parenting” related words were Googled. One ad had the word “stipend,” and the other did not. We then examine differences in response between high and low-income towns. Next, we analysed differences in click behaviour over 207 days between the two versions of the ads. We then examined differences in click behaviour between residents of high and low-income towns. We used the t-test to test for differences in our data analysis approach.
We find no statistical difference in response between the ads that mention ‘stipend’ and those that do not (t = 0.64, p = 0.26). However, residents of low-income towns are five times more likely to click on a foster parent ad than residents from high-income towns, irrespective of whether the stipend is mentioned in the ad (without mentioning stipend: t = 3.21, p = 0.0008; mentioning Stipend: t = 3.77, p = 0.0001).
期刊介绍:
Child Abuse Review provides a forum for all professionals working in the field of child protection, giving them access to the latest research findings, practice developments, training initiatives and policy issues. The Journal"s remit includes all forms of maltreatment, whether they occur inside or outside the family environment. Papers are written in a style appropriate for a multidisciplinary audience and those from outside Britain are welcomed. The Journal maintains a practice orientated focus and authors of research papers are encouraged to examine and discuss implications for practitioners.