Ida Marie Bruun Grønbæk, Sarah Mollerup, Sofie Ingdam Halkjær, Sarah Juel Paulsen, Mette Pinholt, Henrik Westh, Andreas Munk Petersen
{"title":"在对炎症性和非炎症性肠道疾病患者及健康对照组进行射枪元基因组微生物组分析时,不含乙醇的粪便样本冷冻保存24小时的效果优于含乙醇的保存。","authors":"Ida Marie Bruun Grønbæk, Sarah Mollerup, Sofie Ingdam Halkjær, Sarah Juel Paulsen, Mette Pinholt, Henrik Westh, Andreas Munk Petersen","doi":"10.1186/s13104-024-06999-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The influence of different faecal collection methods on metagenomic analyses remains under discussion, and there is no general agreement on which collection method is preferable for gut microbiome research. We compared faecal samples collected in tubes without preservatives with those containing 10 mL of 96% ethanol for gut microbiome research when the timeframe from defecation to freezing at - 80 °C was up to 24 h. We aimed to compare the collection methods on faeces from participants with inflammatory and non-inflammatory gastrointestinal disorders and healthy controls to investigate the most suitable method when considering data yield, human fraction of sequencing reads, and ease of use. We also examined the faecal sample homogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Faeces collected in tubes without preservatives resulted in more sequencing reads compared to faeces collected in tubes with 96% ethanol and were also easier to handle. The human fraction of total reads in faeces collected in ethanol from participants with inflammatory bowel disease was higher than all other samples. DNA extraction and sequencing from two different locations in the same faecal sample gave similar results and showed sample homogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"17 1","pages":"340"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faecal sample storage without ethanol for up to 24 h followed by freezing performs better than storage with ethanol for shotgun metagenomic microbiome analysis in patients with inflammatory and non-inflammatory intestinal diseases and healthy controls.\",\"authors\":\"Ida Marie Bruun Grønbæk, Sarah Mollerup, Sofie Ingdam Halkjær, Sarah Juel Paulsen, Mette Pinholt, Henrik Westh, Andreas Munk Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13104-024-06999-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The influence of different faecal collection methods on metagenomic analyses remains under discussion, and there is no general agreement on which collection method is preferable for gut microbiome research. We compared faecal samples collected in tubes without preservatives with those containing 10 mL of 96% ethanol for gut microbiome research when the timeframe from defecation to freezing at - 80 °C was up to 24 h. We aimed to compare the collection methods on faeces from participants with inflammatory and non-inflammatory gastrointestinal disorders and healthy controls to investigate the most suitable method when considering data yield, human fraction of sequencing reads, and ease of use. We also examined the faecal sample homogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Faeces collected in tubes without preservatives resulted in more sequencing reads compared to faeces collected in tubes with 96% ethanol and were also easier to handle. The human fraction of total reads in faeces collected in ethanol from participants with inflammatory bowel disease was higher than all other samples. DNA extraction and sequencing from two different locations in the same faecal sample gave similar results and showed sample homogeneity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568685/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06999-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06999-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:不同的粪便采集方法对元基因组分析的影响仍在讨论之中,对于哪种采集方法更适合肠道微生物组研究,目前还没有达成普遍共识。我们比较了用不含防腐剂的试管和含有 10 mL 96% 乙醇的试管收集的粪便样本,当从排便到冷冻在 - 80 °C 的时间框架最长为 24 小时时,我们将其用于肠道微生物组研究。我们的目的是比较炎症性和非炎症性胃肠道疾病参与者和健康对照组粪便的收集方法,以研究在考虑数据产量、测序读数的人类部分和易用性时最合适的方法。我们还研究了粪便样本的均匀性:结果:用不含防腐剂的试管收集的粪便与用含96%乙醇的试管收集的粪便相比,测序读数更多,也更容易处理。从患有炎症性肠病的参与者粪便中提取的人类总读数比其他所有样本都高。从同一粪便样本的两个不同位置提取DNA并进行测序,结果相似,表明样本具有同质性。
Faecal sample storage without ethanol for up to 24 h followed by freezing performs better than storage with ethanol for shotgun metagenomic microbiome analysis in patients with inflammatory and non-inflammatory intestinal diseases and healthy controls.
Objective: The influence of different faecal collection methods on metagenomic analyses remains under discussion, and there is no general agreement on which collection method is preferable for gut microbiome research. We compared faecal samples collected in tubes without preservatives with those containing 10 mL of 96% ethanol for gut microbiome research when the timeframe from defecation to freezing at - 80 °C was up to 24 h. We aimed to compare the collection methods on faeces from participants with inflammatory and non-inflammatory gastrointestinal disorders and healthy controls to investigate the most suitable method when considering data yield, human fraction of sequencing reads, and ease of use. We also examined the faecal sample homogeneity.
Results: Faeces collected in tubes without preservatives resulted in more sequencing reads compared to faeces collected in tubes with 96% ethanol and were also easier to handle. The human fraction of total reads in faeces collected in ethanol from participants with inflammatory bowel disease was higher than all other samples. DNA extraction and sequencing from two different locations in the same faecal sample gave similar results and showed sample homogeneity.
BMC Research NotesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍:
BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.