低收入和中等收入国家利用私营医疗服务提供者数据进行治理:范围界定审查的结果。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083096
Alix Faddoul, Dominic Montagu, Sneha Kanneganti, Barbara O'Hanlon
{"title":"低收入和中等收入国家利用私营医疗服务提供者数据进行治理:范围界定审查的结果。","authors":"Alix Faddoul, Dominic Montagu, Sneha Kanneganti, Barbara O'Hanlon","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This work grew from an interest in understanding how private data are used for health system governance in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a scoping review to understand how the public sector collects routine data from the private health sector and uses it for governance purposes. The private health sector was defined to include both formal and informal, for-profit or non-profit, actors delivering healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified 4014 individual English language studies published between 2010 and 2021. We reviewed titles and abstracts of all, with 50% reviewed by two authors to ensure a common application of inclusion criteria. 89 studies were selected for review in full; following this, 26 articles were included in the final selection as they directly report on the use of routine private sector data for governance in LMICs. Only English language studies were included, limiting the scope of possible conclusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were most commonly collected by the Ministry of Health or a subministerial office, with extraction from District Health Information System 2 specifically cited for three studies. 16 studies collected data on infrastructure and distribution, 15 on service delivery, 12 on health financing, 7 on pharmaceuticals and other consumables, 4 on health workforce, 4 on quality of care and 4 on epidemic surveillance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The studies identified provide examples of the public sector's capacity to collect and use data routinely collected from the private sector to perform essential governance functions. The paucity of studies identified is an indication that more attention is needed to ensure that this key area of health system governance is undertaken and that lessons learnt are shared. This review provides insights to understanding private sector health data collection and use for governance in LMICs, and for guiding activities to assess and improve this according to country context and capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uses of private health provider data for governance in low-income and middle-income countries: results from a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Alix Faddoul, Dominic Montagu, Sneha Kanneganti, Barbara O'Hanlon\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This work grew from an interest in understanding how private data are used for health system governance in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a scoping review to understand how the public sector collects routine data from the private health sector and uses it for governance purposes. The private health sector was defined to include both formal and informal, for-profit or non-profit, actors delivering healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified 4014 individual English language studies published between 2010 and 2021. We reviewed titles and abstracts of all, with 50% reviewed by two authors to ensure a common application of inclusion criteria. 89 studies were selected for review in full; following this, 26 articles were included in the final selection as they directly report on the use of routine private sector data for governance in LMICs. Only English language studies were included, limiting the scope of possible conclusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were most commonly collected by the Ministry of Health or a subministerial office, with extraction from District Health Information System 2 specifically cited for three studies. 16 studies collected data on infrastructure and distribution, 15 on service delivery, 12 on health financing, 7 on pharmaceuticals and other consumables, 4 on health workforce, 4 on quality of care and 4 on epidemic surveillance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The studies identified provide examples of the public sector's capacity to collect and use data routinely collected from the private sector to perform essential governance functions. The paucity of studies identified is an indication that more attention is needed to ensure that this key area of health system governance is undertaken and that lessons learnt are shared. This review provides insights to understanding private sector health data collection and use for governance in LMICs, and for guiding activities to assess and improve this according to country context and capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083096\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作源于我们对了解低收入和中等收入国家 (LMIC) 如何将私营数据用于卫生系统治理的兴趣:我们进行了一次范围界定审查,以了解公共部门如何从私营卫生部门收集常规数据并将其用于治理目的。私营医疗部门的定义包括正规和非正规、营利性或非营利性的医疗服务提供者:我们确定了 2010 年至 2021 年间发表的 4014 篇英文研究。我们审阅了所有研究的标题和摘要,其中 50% 由两位作者审阅,以确保共同应用纳入标准。89 篇研究被选中进行全文审阅;随后,26 篇文章被纳入最终选题,因为它们直接报告了低收入与中等收入国家在治理中使用私营部门常规数据的情况。只有英文研究被纳入,从而限制了可能得出结论的范围:数据通常由卫生部或部级以下机构收集,有三项研究特别提到了从地区卫生信息系统 2 中提取的数据。16 项研究收集了关于基础设施和分配的数据,15 项研究收集了关于服务提供的数据,12 项研究收集了关于卫生筹资的数据,7 项研究收集了关于药品和其他消耗品的数据,4 项研究收集了关于卫生工作者的数据,4 项研究收集了关于医疗质量的数据,4 项研究收集了关于流行病监测的数据:所确定的研究提供了公共部门收集和使用从私营部门例行收集的数据以履行基本治理职能的能力实例。所发现的研究很少,这表明需要给予更多关注,以确保在卫生系统治理的这一关键领域开展研究并分享经验教训。本综述为了解低收入与中等收入国家的私营部门卫生数据收集和使用情况提供了见解,并为根据国情和能力评估和改进这方面的活动提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uses of private health provider data for governance in low-income and middle-income countries: results from a scoping review.

This work grew from an interest in understanding how private data are used for health system governance in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Objective: We conducted a scoping review to understand how the public sector collects routine data from the private health sector and uses it for governance purposes. The private health sector was defined to include both formal and informal, for-profit or non-profit, actors delivering healthcare services.

Findings: We identified 4014 individual English language studies published between 2010 and 2021. We reviewed titles and abstracts of all, with 50% reviewed by two authors to ensure a common application of inclusion criteria. 89 studies were selected for review in full; following this, 26 articles were included in the final selection as they directly report on the use of routine private sector data for governance in LMICs. Only English language studies were included, limiting the scope of possible conclusions.

Results: Data were most commonly collected by the Ministry of Health or a subministerial office, with extraction from District Health Information System 2 specifically cited for three studies. 16 studies collected data on infrastructure and distribution, 15 on service delivery, 12 on health financing, 7 on pharmaceuticals and other consumables, 4 on health workforce, 4 on quality of care and 4 on epidemic surveillance.

Conclusion: The studies identified provide examples of the public sector's capacity to collect and use data routinely collected from the private sector to perform essential governance functions. The paucity of studies identified is an indication that more attention is needed to ensure that this key area of health system governance is undertaken and that lessons learnt are shared. This review provides insights to understanding private sector health data collection and use for governance in LMICs, and for guiding activities to assess and improve this according to country context and capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Pain during prolonged sitting in subjects with patellofemoral pain in Dutch physical therapy clinics: an online questionnaire-based analysis. Post-COVID in healthcare workers and its consequences on quality of life, activities, participation, need for rehabilitation and care experiences: protocol of a cohort study. Association between life satisfaction and health behaviours among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Determinants of inpatient satisfaction and hospital recommendation: experiences from a cross-sectional study of a tertiary general hospital in China. Development and validation of a clinical prediction tool to estimate survival in community-dwelling adults living with dementia: a protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1