COVID-19 患者使用酞菁铁衍生物漱口水能否带来全身性的益处?应考虑对这一可能性进行研究。

IF 1.7 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH GMS Hygiene and Infection Control Pub Date : 2024-10-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3205/dgkh000500
Bernardo da Fonseca Orcina, Laura Bertin, Emilene Cristine Izu Nakamura Pietro, Juliana Pescinelli Garcia Kuroda, Lucas Marques da Costa Alves, Fabiano Vieira Vilhena, Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos
{"title":"COVID-19 患者使用酞菁铁衍生物漱口水能否带来全身性的益处?应考虑对这一可能性进行研究。","authors":"Bernardo da Fonseca Orcina, Laura Bertin, Emilene Cristine Izu Nakamura Pietro, Juliana Pescinelli Garcia Kuroda, Lucas Marques da Costa Alves, Fabiano Vieira Vilhena, Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos","doi":"10.3205/dgkh000500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this brief report is to discuss the impact of an oral rinse and spray containing an iron phthalocyanine derivative as an additional therapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the first study by this group of authors published on this topic, the clinical status of 22 patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalized and receiving PDMS (phthalocyanine derivative mouth spray) was assessed using the Karnofsky scale (KS) for thtree days (D0, D2, and D4). In another study, the laboratory data (CBC, D-dimer, Ferritin, and C-reactive protein [CRP]) of 41 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who took part in a randomized clinical trial with an MIPD (mouthwash with iron phthalocyanine derivative) were evaluated retrospectively on the first day of intervention (D1) and 48 hours later (D2). The present study used these data to determine a correlation between clinical symptoms and laboratory data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In individuals receiving PDMS and evaluated using the KS, a statistically significant intra-group difference (p=0.03, Friedman's test) was identified. The Durbin-Conover test found a significant difference between D0 and D2 (p=0.008). Laboratory data from only 9 patients in the experimental group and 13 patients in the control group were found in the retrospective analysis. There were no statistically significant confounders in the survival analysis using the Cox regression model. In the descriptive analysis, the intervention group's CRP was lower than that of the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PDMS demonstrated considerable clinical improvement in patients, whereas MIPD appears to lower CRP, an inflammatory marker, in descriptive analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12738,"journal":{"name":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","volume":"19 ","pages":"Doc45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the use of iron phthalocyanine-derivative mouthrinses in COVID-19 patients provide systemic benefits? Research into this potential should be considered.\",\"authors\":\"Bernardo da Fonseca Orcina, Laura Bertin, Emilene Cristine Izu Nakamura Pietro, Juliana Pescinelli Garcia Kuroda, Lucas Marques da Costa Alves, Fabiano Vieira Vilhena, Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/dgkh000500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this brief report is to discuss the impact of an oral rinse and spray containing an iron phthalocyanine derivative as an additional therapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the first study by this group of authors published on this topic, the clinical status of 22 patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalized and receiving PDMS (phthalocyanine derivative mouth spray) was assessed using the Karnofsky scale (KS) for thtree days (D0, D2, and D4). In another study, the laboratory data (CBC, D-dimer, Ferritin, and C-reactive protein [CRP]) of 41 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who took part in a randomized clinical trial with an MIPD (mouthwash with iron phthalocyanine derivative) were evaluated retrospectively on the first day of intervention (D1) and 48 hours later (D2). The present study used these data to determine a correlation between clinical symptoms and laboratory data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In individuals receiving PDMS and evaluated using the KS, a statistically significant intra-group difference (p=0.03, Friedman's test) was identified. The Durbin-Conover test found a significant difference between D0 and D2 (p=0.008). Laboratory data from only 9 patients in the experimental group and 13 patients in the control group were found in the retrospective analysis. There were no statistically significant confounders in the survival analysis using the Cox regression model. In the descriptive analysis, the intervention group's CRP was lower than that of the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PDMS demonstrated considerable clinical improvement in patients, whereas MIPD appears to lower CRP, an inflammatory marker, in descriptive analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Doc45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565403/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本简短报告旨在讨论含铁酞菁衍生物的口腔漱口液和喷雾剂作为附加疗法对住院的 COVID-19 患者的影响:在这组作者发表的第一项相关研究中,使用卡诺夫斯基量表(KS)评估了 22 名住院并接受 PDMS(酞菁衍生物口腔喷雾剂)治疗的 COVID-19 患者三天(D0、D2 和 D4)的临床状态。在另一项研究中,对参加 MIPD(含铁酞菁衍生物的漱口水)随机临床试验的 41 名 COVID-19 住院患者在干预第一天(D1)和 48 小时后(D2)的实验室数据(全血细胞计数、D-二聚体、铁蛋白和 C 反应蛋白 [CRP])进行了回顾性评估。本研究利用这些数据来确定临床症状与实验室数据之间的相关性:结果:在接受 PDMS 并使用 KS 进行评估的患者中,发现组内差异具有统计学意义(P=0.03,弗里德曼检验)。Durbin-Conover检验发现D0和D2之间存在显著差异(p=0.008)。在回顾性分析中,只找到了实验组 9 名患者和对照组 13 名患者的实验室数据。在使用 Cox 回归模型进行的生存分析中,没有统计学意义上的混杂因素。在描述性分析中,干预组的 CRP 低于对照组:结论:PDMS对患者的临床症状有显著改善,而MIPD在描述性分析中似乎降低了炎症标志物CRP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can the use of iron phthalocyanine-derivative mouthrinses in COVID-19 patients provide systemic benefits? Research into this potential should be considered.

Aim: The purpose of this brief report is to discuss the impact of an oral rinse and spray containing an iron phthalocyanine derivative as an additional therapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Methods: In the first study by this group of authors published on this topic, the clinical status of 22 patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalized and receiving PDMS (phthalocyanine derivative mouth spray) was assessed using the Karnofsky scale (KS) for thtree days (D0, D2, and D4). In another study, the laboratory data (CBC, D-dimer, Ferritin, and C-reactive protein [CRP]) of 41 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who took part in a randomized clinical trial with an MIPD (mouthwash with iron phthalocyanine derivative) were evaluated retrospectively on the first day of intervention (D1) and 48 hours later (D2). The present study used these data to determine a correlation between clinical symptoms and laboratory data.

Results: In individuals receiving PDMS and evaluated using the KS, a statistically significant intra-group difference (p=0.03, Friedman's test) was identified. The Durbin-Conover test found a significant difference between D0 and D2 (p=0.008). Laboratory data from only 9 patients in the experimental group and 13 patients in the control group were found in the retrospective analysis. There were no statistically significant confounders in the survival analysis using the Cox regression model. In the descriptive analysis, the intervention group's CRP was lower than that of the control group.

Conclusion: PDMS demonstrated considerable clinical improvement in patients, whereas MIPD appears to lower CRP, an inflammatory marker, in descriptive analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
An analysis of the efficacy of universal PCR and BACTEC 9120 BD for identifying bacteremia in pediatrics. Association of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) gene polymorphisms with periodontitis: a systematic review. The effect of AH26, Endoseal and ZOE sealers on Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis. The role of small extracellular vesicles in spreading and inhibiting arthropod-borne diseases. Trichophyton tonsurans infections after visiting a barbershop - findings from official hygiene monitoring.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1