有针对性的信息会影响消费者对基于价值的医疗保险的偏好吗?来自调查实验的证据。

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Health Economics Review Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1186/s13561-024-00573-9
Tess L C Bardy, Stefan Boes
{"title":"有针对性的信息会影响消费者对基于价值的医疗保险的偏好吗?来自调查实验的证据。","authors":"Tess L C Bardy, Stefan Boes","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00573-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Value-based insurance design (VBID) aims to direct consumers' preferences by incentivizing the use of high-value care and discouraging the use of low-value care. However, consumers often have limited knowledge of health insurance and the health insurance system, possibly distorting their preferences. In this study, we aim to investigate the impact of specific information treatments on consumers' preferences for VBID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented an information experiment as part of a representative survey on health insurance literacy and preferences for VBID within Switzerland's choice-based health insurance system. Preferences for VBID were measured through a discrete choice experiment. Cross-sectional data on 6,033 respondents aged 26-75 were analyzed using descriptive statistics and mixed logit regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents showed strong preferences for their current health insurance instead of VBID alternatives. A general description of current regulations on cost-sharing, drug disbursement, and monthly premiums significantly increased preferences for VBID (p < 0.01). Pointing respondents specifically to VBID further reduced the opposition against VBID plans. At the same time, there is evidence for anchoring effects in copayments after receiving the information treatments, irrespective of the value of the care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study highlight that individuals are susceptible to provided information about health insurance when building their preferences for VBID. One potential explanation is limited health insurance literacy, implying that tailored communication strategies may be needed to improve insurance decision-making.</p><p><strong>Jel classification: </strong>I11, I13.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does targeted information impact consumers' preferences for value-based health insurance? Evidence from a survey experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Tess L C Bardy, Stefan Boes\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13561-024-00573-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Value-based insurance design (VBID) aims to direct consumers' preferences by incentivizing the use of high-value care and discouraging the use of low-value care. However, consumers often have limited knowledge of health insurance and the health insurance system, possibly distorting their preferences. In this study, we aim to investigate the impact of specific information treatments on consumers' preferences for VBID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented an information experiment as part of a representative survey on health insurance literacy and preferences for VBID within Switzerland's choice-based health insurance system. Preferences for VBID were measured through a discrete choice experiment. Cross-sectional data on 6,033 respondents aged 26-75 were analyzed using descriptive statistics and mixed logit regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents showed strong preferences for their current health insurance instead of VBID alternatives. A general description of current regulations on cost-sharing, drug disbursement, and monthly premiums significantly increased preferences for VBID (p < 0.01). Pointing respondents specifically to VBID further reduced the opposition against VBID plans. At the same time, there is evidence for anchoring effects in copayments after receiving the information treatments, irrespective of the value of the care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study highlight that individuals are susceptible to provided information about health insurance when building their preferences for VBID. One potential explanation is limited health insurance literacy, implying that tailored communication strategies may be needed to improve insurance decision-making.</p><p><strong>Jel classification: </strong>I11, I13.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-024-00573-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-024-00573-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:基于价值的保险设计(VBID)旨在通过鼓励使用高价值的医疗服务和阻止使用低价值的医疗服务来引导消费者的偏好。然而,消费者对医疗保险和医疗保险系统的了解往往有限,这可能会扭曲他们的偏好。在本研究中,我们旨在调查特定信息处理对消费者 VBID 偏好的影响:方法:我们进行了一项信息实验,作为瑞士基于选择的医疗保险体系中医疗保险知识和 VBID 偏好代表性调查的一部分。对 VBID 的偏好通过离散选择实验进行测量。采用描述性统计和混合对数回归法分析了 6,033 名 26-75 岁受访者的横截面数据:结果:受访者强烈倾向于目前的医疗保险,而不是 VBID 替代方案。对当前费用分摊、药物支付和月保费规定的一般描述显著增加了对 VBID 的偏好(p 结论):本研究的结果突出表明,个人在建立对 VBID 的偏好时,很容易受到所提供的医疗保险信息的影响。一种可能的解释是医疗保险知识有限,这意味着可能需要有针对性的沟通策略来改善保险决策:I11, I13.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does targeted information impact consumers' preferences for value-based health insurance? Evidence from a survey experiment.

Objectives: Value-based insurance design (VBID) aims to direct consumers' preferences by incentivizing the use of high-value care and discouraging the use of low-value care. However, consumers often have limited knowledge of health insurance and the health insurance system, possibly distorting their preferences. In this study, we aim to investigate the impact of specific information treatments on consumers' preferences for VBID.

Methods: We implemented an information experiment as part of a representative survey on health insurance literacy and preferences for VBID within Switzerland's choice-based health insurance system. Preferences for VBID were measured through a discrete choice experiment. Cross-sectional data on 6,033 respondents aged 26-75 were analyzed using descriptive statistics and mixed logit regressions.

Results: Respondents showed strong preferences for their current health insurance instead of VBID alternatives. A general description of current regulations on cost-sharing, drug disbursement, and monthly premiums significantly increased preferences for VBID (p < 0.01). Pointing respondents specifically to VBID further reduced the opposition against VBID plans. At the same time, there is evidence for anchoring effects in copayments after receiving the information treatments, irrespective of the value of the care.

Conclusions: The results of this study highlight that individuals are susceptible to provided information about health insurance when building their preferences for VBID. One potential explanation is limited health insurance literacy, implying that tailored communication strategies may be needed to improve insurance decision-making.

Jel classification: I11, I13.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
期刊最新文献
Does targeted information impact consumers' preferences for value-based health insurance? Evidence from a survey experiment. Determinants of households' willingness to pay for health insurance in Burkina Faso. Regulation of mark-up on medicine prices in Zimbabwe: a pilot survey from 92 community pharmacies in the metropolitan area of Harare. Malaria in the Republic of Guinea 2022-2023: costs associated with the care pathway from the patient's perspective. Considerations when applying equity weights within economic evaluation when making drug reimbursement decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1