{"title":"促进性相互作用可促进各种生态系统的生物多样性:对生态系统管理和恢复的影响","authors":"Dongdong Qiu , Yanpeng Zhu , Yueheng Ren , Zhichao Xu , Zhanjun Quan","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Positive interactions, such as facilitation and mutualism, can promote community construction and maintenance of ecosystem biodiversity and resilience. However, there are few global meta-analyses on whether and how facilitative interactions affect biodiversity indices in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. We synthetically reviewed 344 studies of the effects of facilitative interactions on biodiversity, and reviewed and meta-analyzed 177 studies, which contain available data about the effects of facilitative interaction on ecosystem biodiversity, richness, and abundance. The results indicated an upward trend for the number of studies published annually on this topic, particularly after 2010, reflecting an increasing interest in facilitative interactions. Most studies were conducted in North America and Europe, followed by South America, Asia, Oceania, and Africa. Most studies were conducted in marine and coastal ecosystems and grasslands, followed by forests, shrublands, deserts, and inland wetlands. Our meta-analyses showed that facilitative interactions significantly increased the Shannon diversity, species richness, and species abundance in various terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, even if several studies showed non-significant or negative effects. Facilitators promoted species biodiversity mainly by reducing physical or biotic stress, ameliorating harsh environments, spreading pollen, providing shelter, and defending against enemies. We conclude that facilitative interactions are essential in maintaining and promoting the biodiversity of various ecosystems. Thus, the conservation of facilitator species should be a priority, and facilitative interactions should be applied to ecosystem restoration and management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 107455"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facilitative interactions promote biodiversity in various ecosystems: Implications for ecosystem management and restoration\",\"authors\":\"Dongdong Qiu , Yanpeng Zhu , Yueheng Ren , Zhichao Xu , Zhanjun Quan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Positive interactions, such as facilitation and mutualism, can promote community construction and maintenance of ecosystem biodiversity and resilience. However, there are few global meta-analyses on whether and how facilitative interactions affect biodiversity indices in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. We synthetically reviewed 344 studies of the effects of facilitative interactions on biodiversity, and reviewed and meta-analyzed 177 studies, which contain available data about the effects of facilitative interaction on ecosystem biodiversity, richness, and abundance. The results indicated an upward trend for the number of studies published annually on this topic, particularly after 2010, reflecting an increasing interest in facilitative interactions. Most studies were conducted in North America and Europe, followed by South America, Asia, Oceania, and Africa. Most studies were conducted in marine and coastal ecosystems and grasslands, followed by forests, shrublands, deserts, and inland wetlands. Our meta-analyses showed that facilitative interactions significantly increased the Shannon diversity, species richness, and species abundance in various terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, even if several studies showed non-significant or negative effects. Facilitators promoted species biodiversity mainly by reducing physical or biotic stress, ameliorating harsh environments, spreading pollen, providing shelter, and defending against enemies. We conclude that facilitative interactions are essential in maintaining and promoting the biodiversity of various ecosystems. Thus, the conservation of facilitator species should be a priority, and facilitative interactions should be applied to ecosystem restoration and management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"210 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002805\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002805","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Facilitative interactions promote biodiversity in various ecosystems: Implications for ecosystem management and restoration
Positive interactions, such as facilitation and mutualism, can promote community construction and maintenance of ecosystem biodiversity and resilience. However, there are few global meta-analyses on whether and how facilitative interactions affect biodiversity indices in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. We synthetically reviewed 344 studies of the effects of facilitative interactions on biodiversity, and reviewed and meta-analyzed 177 studies, which contain available data about the effects of facilitative interaction on ecosystem biodiversity, richness, and abundance. The results indicated an upward trend for the number of studies published annually on this topic, particularly after 2010, reflecting an increasing interest in facilitative interactions. Most studies were conducted in North America and Europe, followed by South America, Asia, Oceania, and Africa. Most studies were conducted in marine and coastal ecosystems and grasslands, followed by forests, shrublands, deserts, and inland wetlands. Our meta-analyses showed that facilitative interactions significantly increased the Shannon diversity, species richness, and species abundance in various terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, even if several studies showed non-significant or negative effects. Facilitators promoted species biodiversity mainly by reducing physical or biotic stress, ameliorating harsh environments, spreading pollen, providing shelter, and defending against enemies. We conclude that facilitative interactions are essential in maintaining and promoting the biodiversity of various ecosystems. Thus, the conservation of facilitator species should be a priority, and facilitative interactions should be applied to ecosystem restoration and management.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.