Tania M. Kenyon , Conor Jones , David Rissik , Wills Brassil , David Callaghan , Neil Mattocks , Tom E. Baldock
{"title":"用于稳定碎石的生物可降解 \"珊瑚礁袋 \"及其对碎石稳定性、粘结性、珊瑚繁殖和鱼类栖息的影响","authors":"Tania M. Kenyon , Conor Jones , David Rissik , Wills Brassil , David Callaghan , Neil Mattocks , Tom E. Baldock","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Substrate stabilisation can be used to enhance coral recruitment where mobile rubble beds have formed post-disturbance. We trialled gabion-like ‘reef bags’, biodegradable coconut-fibre coir mesh bags filled with coral rubble at Pinnacle Bay and Bait Reef on the Great Barrier Reef. Most coir remained intact during the first 12 months, but had completely biodegraded after 2 years, leaving behind the experimental rubble mounds. After approximately 2 years, fish abundance was higher above mounds compared to surrounding rubble. After approximately 3 years, rubble stability and binding was also higher in rubble mounds than in surrounding rubble at Pinnacle Bay, but not at Bait Reef (although binding <em>did</em> increase in Bait Reef mounds over this time). The increased stability and binding did not, however, translate to significantly higher coral recruitment on rubble mounds in either location. The placement of these reef bags in terms of depth, reef zone, sediment load and competition appears crucial. Future trials should consider the size and interlocked-ness of rubble, the size of reef bags, larger mesh hole sizes, the number of layers of coir, and include unbagged mounds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 107433"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bio-degradable ‘reef bags’ used for rubble stabilisation and their impact on rubble stability, binding, coral recruitment and fish occupancy\",\"authors\":\"Tania M. Kenyon , Conor Jones , David Rissik , Wills Brassil , David Callaghan , Neil Mattocks , Tom E. Baldock\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Substrate stabilisation can be used to enhance coral recruitment where mobile rubble beds have formed post-disturbance. We trialled gabion-like ‘reef bags’, biodegradable coconut-fibre coir mesh bags filled with coral rubble at Pinnacle Bay and Bait Reef on the Great Barrier Reef. Most coir remained intact during the first 12 months, but had completely biodegraded after 2 years, leaving behind the experimental rubble mounds. After approximately 2 years, fish abundance was higher above mounds compared to surrounding rubble. After approximately 3 years, rubble stability and binding was also higher in rubble mounds than in surrounding rubble at Pinnacle Bay, but not at Bait Reef (although binding <em>did</em> increase in Bait Reef mounds over this time). The increased stability and binding did not, however, translate to significantly higher coral recruitment on rubble mounds in either location. The placement of these reef bags in terms of depth, reef zone, sediment load and competition appears crucial. Future trials should consider the size and interlocked-ness of rubble, the size of reef bags, larger mesh hole sizes, the number of layers of coir, and include unbagged mounds.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"210 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107433\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002581\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bio-degradable ‘reef bags’ used for rubble stabilisation and their impact on rubble stability, binding, coral recruitment and fish occupancy
Substrate stabilisation can be used to enhance coral recruitment where mobile rubble beds have formed post-disturbance. We trialled gabion-like ‘reef bags’, biodegradable coconut-fibre coir mesh bags filled with coral rubble at Pinnacle Bay and Bait Reef on the Great Barrier Reef. Most coir remained intact during the first 12 months, but had completely biodegraded after 2 years, leaving behind the experimental rubble mounds. After approximately 2 years, fish abundance was higher above mounds compared to surrounding rubble. After approximately 3 years, rubble stability and binding was also higher in rubble mounds than in surrounding rubble at Pinnacle Bay, but not at Bait Reef (although binding did increase in Bait Reef mounds over this time). The increased stability and binding did not, however, translate to significantly higher coral recruitment on rubble mounds in either location. The placement of these reef bags in terms of depth, reef zone, sediment load and competition appears crucial. Future trials should consider the size and interlocked-ness of rubble, the size of reef bags, larger mesh hole sizes, the number of layers of coir, and include unbagged mounds.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.