石油净化脱硫化合物的计算建模:减少环境影响和材料成本的工艺分析

IF 6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Ain Shams Engineering Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.asej.2024.102986
Hui Gao , Tonghui Liu , Xiangyao Zhang , Yajun Ji , Wei Wei , Xiaoyong Liu , Kai Zhang
{"title":"石油净化脱硫化合物的计算建模:减少环境影响和材料成本的工艺分析","authors":"Hui Gao ,&nbsp;Tonghui Liu ,&nbsp;Xiangyao Zhang ,&nbsp;Yajun Ji ,&nbsp;Wei Wei ,&nbsp;Xiaoyong Liu ,&nbsp;Kai Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.asej.2024.102986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the course of this investigation, three machine learning models (Gaussian Process Regression, Decision Tree Regression, and Kernel Ridge Regression) were examined for determining the correlation between the input variables (x and y) which are spatial coordinates of model’s geometry, and the content of species in adsorption for sulfur capture. For the process modeling, mass transfer was analyzed, and the concentration distribution of sulfur compound was obtained via numerical solution of mass transfer equations, and then used for machine learning models. The machine learning models were trained using a dataset of 19,000 observations, and their performance was assessed through metrics including R<sup>2</sup> score, MAE, and RMSE. Analysis of the results reveals that Decision Tree Regression surpassed the other two models in performance, with an R<sup>2</sup> score of 0.9989, MAE of 6.64405E-01, and RMSE of 1.1277E+00. Gaussian Process Regression had an R<sup>2</sup> score of 0.97106, MAE of 3.65541E+00, and RMSE of 5.6821E+00, while Kernel Ridge Regression had an R<sup>2</sup> score of 0.86347, MAE of 8.26121E+00, and RMSE of 1.1330E+01. The Clonal Selection Algorithm was used for hyper-parameter optimization for all models. These findings demonstrate the potential of machine learning techniques for accurately and reliably predicting the concentration of chemical species and highlight the importance of considering the choice of model and hyper-parameter optimization for optimal performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48648,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","volume":"15 11","pages":"Article 102986"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational modeling of petroleum purification for removal of sulfur compounds: Process analysis for reduction of environmental impacts and material costs\",\"authors\":\"Hui Gao ,&nbsp;Tonghui Liu ,&nbsp;Xiangyao Zhang ,&nbsp;Yajun Ji ,&nbsp;Wei Wei ,&nbsp;Xiaoyong Liu ,&nbsp;Kai Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asej.2024.102986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the course of this investigation, three machine learning models (Gaussian Process Regression, Decision Tree Regression, and Kernel Ridge Regression) were examined for determining the correlation between the input variables (x and y) which are spatial coordinates of model’s geometry, and the content of species in adsorption for sulfur capture. For the process modeling, mass transfer was analyzed, and the concentration distribution of sulfur compound was obtained via numerical solution of mass transfer equations, and then used for machine learning models. The machine learning models were trained using a dataset of 19,000 observations, and their performance was assessed through metrics including R<sup>2</sup> score, MAE, and RMSE. Analysis of the results reveals that Decision Tree Regression surpassed the other two models in performance, with an R<sup>2</sup> score of 0.9989, MAE of 6.64405E-01, and RMSE of 1.1277E+00. Gaussian Process Regression had an R<sup>2</sup> score of 0.97106, MAE of 3.65541E+00, and RMSE of 5.6821E+00, while Kernel Ridge Regression had an R<sup>2</sup> score of 0.86347, MAE of 8.26121E+00, and RMSE of 1.1330E+01. The Clonal Selection Algorithm was used for hyper-parameter optimization for all models. These findings demonstrate the potential of machine learning techniques for accurately and reliably predicting the concentration of chemical species and highlight the importance of considering the choice of model and hyper-parameter optimization for optimal performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ain Shams Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 102986\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ain Shams Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447924003617\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447924003617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这一研究过程中,对三种机器学习模型(高斯过程回归、决策树回归和核岭回归)进行了研究,以确定输入变量(x 和 y)(即模型几何形状的空间坐标)与硫捕获吸附物种含量之间的相关性。在过程建模方面,对传质进行了分析,通过对传质方程的数值求解获得了硫化合物的浓度分布,然后用于机器学习模型。使用 19,000 个观测数据集对机器学习模型进行了训练,并通过 R2 分数、MAE 和 RMSE 等指标对其性能进行了评估。结果分析表明,决策树回归模型的性能超过了其他两个模型,其 R2 得分为 0.9989,MAE 为 6.64405E-01,RMSE 为 1.1277E+00。高斯过程回归的 R2 得分为 0.97106,MAE 为 3.65541E+00,RMSE 为 5.6821E+00;而核岭回归的 R2 得分为 0.86347,MAE 为 8.26121E+00,RMSE 为 1.1330E+01。所有模型都采用了克隆选择算法进行超参数优化。这些发现证明了机器学习技术在准确可靠地预测化学物种浓度方面的潜力,并强调了考虑模型选择和超参数优化以获得最佳性能的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computational modeling of petroleum purification for removal of sulfur compounds: Process analysis for reduction of environmental impacts and material costs
In the course of this investigation, three machine learning models (Gaussian Process Regression, Decision Tree Regression, and Kernel Ridge Regression) were examined for determining the correlation between the input variables (x and y) which are spatial coordinates of model’s geometry, and the content of species in adsorption for sulfur capture. For the process modeling, mass transfer was analyzed, and the concentration distribution of sulfur compound was obtained via numerical solution of mass transfer equations, and then used for machine learning models. The machine learning models were trained using a dataset of 19,000 observations, and their performance was assessed through metrics including R2 score, MAE, and RMSE. Analysis of the results reveals that Decision Tree Regression surpassed the other two models in performance, with an R2 score of 0.9989, MAE of 6.64405E-01, and RMSE of 1.1277E+00. Gaussian Process Regression had an R2 score of 0.97106, MAE of 3.65541E+00, and RMSE of 5.6821E+00, while Kernel Ridge Regression had an R2 score of 0.86347, MAE of 8.26121E+00, and RMSE of 1.1330E+01. The Clonal Selection Algorithm was used for hyper-parameter optimization for all models. These findings demonstrate the potential of machine learning techniques for accurately and reliably predicting the concentration of chemical species and highlight the importance of considering the choice of model and hyper-parameter optimization for optimal performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Ain Shams Engineering Journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
441
审稿时长
49 weeks
期刊介绍: in Shams Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publication of peer reviewed original high-quality research papers and review papers in both traditional topics and those of emerging science and technology. Areas of both theoretical and fundamental interest as well as those concerning industrial applications, emerging instrumental techniques and those which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavor, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal are welcome. The overall focus is on original and rigorous scientific research results which have generic significance. Ain Shams Engineering Journal focuses upon aspects of mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, civil engineering, chemical engineering, petroleum engineering, environmental engineering, architectural and urban planning engineering. Papers in which knowledge from other disciplines is integrated with engineering are especially welcome like nanotechnology, material sciences, and computational methods as well as applied basic sciences: engineering mathematics, physics and chemistry.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Study on the intermediate crack-induced debonding strain of FRP-strengthened concrete members using the updated BP neural network An Improved digital multi-resonant controller for 3 ϕ grid-tied and standalone PV system under balanced and unbalanced conditions Common architectural characteristics of traditional courtyard houses in Erbil city Analysis of Monte-Carlo collision method with argon and helium background gases at different RF-powers and pressures in ELTRAP device
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1