通过固体氧化物电解生产氢气:平衡环境问题和材料关键性

IF 13 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Advances in Applied Energy Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.adapen.2024.100194
Elke Schropp, Gabriel Naumann, Matthias Gaderer
{"title":"通过固体氧化物电解生产氢气:平衡环境问题和材料关键性","authors":"Elke Schropp,&nbsp;Gabriel Naumann,&nbsp;Matthias Gaderer","doi":"10.1016/j.adapen.2024.100194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hydrogen is considered an essential component in mitigating climate change. Water electrolysis technologies present the potential for generating environmentally friendly hydrogen. The solid oxide water electrolysis attracts attention due to its high-temperature operation, leading to an unsurpassed efficiency. Nevertheless, high-temperature operation requires special materials, raising material criticality concerns. This study aims to determine the optimum current density for future solid oxide water electrolysis operation. To this end, the energetic performance of solid oxide electrolysis is assessed under different current densities with a numerical simulation. Consequently, prospective life cycle assessments and product-level material criticality assessments are performed. These dimensions are combined in a multi-criteria optimization. The environmental impacts strongly depend on electricity and heat generation, whereas manufacturing and the feed water supply play a minor role. Heat integration, a unique feature of solid oxide water electrolysis, is beneficial if heat carries less environmental impact than electricity. Then, the solid oxide electrolysis should be operated at relatively low current densities. In contrast, the material criticality decreases with increasing current densities. The multi-criteria optimization reveals that if minimizing environmental impacts and material criticality is equally vital, solid oxide water electrolysis should be operated at 0.955 A/cm<sup>2</sup>, whereas a focus on environmental impacts leads to lower current densities. In conclusion, the energy supply situation affects the operational current density from an environmental perspective. In contrast, the material criticality favors high current densities for solid oxide water electrolysis. When combining both, medium current densities lead to minimum environmental and material criticality issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34615,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Applied Energy","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100194"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrogen production via solid oxide electrolysis: Balancing environmental issues and material criticality\",\"authors\":\"Elke Schropp,&nbsp;Gabriel Naumann,&nbsp;Matthias Gaderer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adapen.2024.100194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Hydrogen is considered an essential component in mitigating climate change. Water electrolysis technologies present the potential for generating environmentally friendly hydrogen. The solid oxide water electrolysis attracts attention due to its high-temperature operation, leading to an unsurpassed efficiency. Nevertheless, high-temperature operation requires special materials, raising material criticality concerns. This study aims to determine the optimum current density for future solid oxide water electrolysis operation. To this end, the energetic performance of solid oxide electrolysis is assessed under different current densities with a numerical simulation. Consequently, prospective life cycle assessments and product-level material criticality assessments are performed. These dimensions are combined in a multi-criteria optimization. The environmental impacts strongly depend on electricity and heat generation, whereas manufacturing and the feed water supply play a minor role. Heat integration, a unique feature of solid oxide water electrolysis, is beneficial if heat carries less environmental impact than electricity. Then, the solid oxide electrolysis should be operated at relatively low current densities. In contrast, the material criticality decreases with increasing current densities. The multi-criteria optimization reveals that if minimizing environmental impacts and material criticality is equally vital, solid oxide water electrolysis should be operated at 0.955 A/cm<sup>2</sup>, whereas a focus on environmental impacts leads to lower current densities. In conclusion, the energy supply situation affects the operational current density from an environmental perspective. In contrast, the material criticality favors high current densities for solid oxide water electrolysis. When combining both, medium current densities lead to minimum environmental and material criticality issues.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792424000325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792424000325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

氢被认为是减缓气候变化的重要组成部分。水电解技术为生产环保型氢气提供了潜力。固体氧化物水电解技术因其高温运行、无与伦比的效率而备受关注。然而,高温运行需要特殊材料,从而引发了材料临界问题。本研究旨在确定未来固体氧化物电解水操作的最佳电流密度。为此,通过数值模拟评估了不同电流密度下固体氧化物电解水的能量性能。因此,还进行了前瞻性生命周期评估和产品级材料临界度评估。这些方面结合在一起进行了多标准优化。对环境的影响在很大程度上取决于发电和制热,而生产和给水供应所起的作用较小。如果热能对环境的影响小于电能,那么热能集成(固体氧化物电解水的一个独特功能)就会带来好处。那么,固体氧化物电解应该在相对较低的电流密度下运行。相反,材料临界度会随着电流密度的增加而降低。多标准优化结果表明,如果环境影响最小化和材料临界度同样重要,则固体氧化物电解水应在 0.955 A/cm2 下运行,而注重环境影响则会导致较低的电流密度。总之,从环境角度来看,能源供应情况会影响运行电流密度。相比之下,材料临界性有利于固体氧化物电解水的高电流密度。将两者结合起来,中等电流密度可将环境和材料临界问题降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hydrogen production via solid oxide electrolysis: Balancing environmental issues and material criticality
Hydrogen is considered an essential component in mitigating climate change. Water electrolysis technologies present the potential for generating environmentally friendly hydrogen. The solid oxide water electrolysis attracts attention due to its high-temperature operation, leading to an unsurpassed efficiency. Nevertheless, high-temperature operation requires special materials, raising material criticality concerns. This study aims to determine the optimum current density for future solid oxide water electrolysis operation. To this end, the energetic performance of solid oxide electrolysis is assessed under different current densities with a numerical simulation. Consequently, prospective life cycle assessments and product-level material criticality assessments are performed. These dimensions are combined in a multi-criteria optimization. The environmental impacts strongly depend on electricity and heat generation, whereas manufacturing and the feed water supply play a minor role. Heat integration, a unique feature of solid oxide water electrolysis, is beneficial if heat carries less environmental impact than electricity. Then, the solid oxide electrolysis should be operated at relatively low current densities. In contrast, the material criticality decreases with increasing current densities. The multi-criteria optimization reveals that if minimizing environmental impacts and material criticality is equally vital, solid oxide water electrolysis should be operated at 0.955 A/cm2, whereas a focus on environmental impacts leads to lower current densities. In conclusion, the energy supply situation affects the operational current density from an environmental perspective. In contrast, the material criticality favors high current densities for solid oxide water electrolysis. When combining both, medium current densities lead to minimum environmental and material criticality issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Applied Energy
Advances in Applied Energy Energy-General Energy
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 days
期刊最新文献
Digitalization of urban multi-energy systems – Advances in digital twin applications across life-cycle phases Multi-scale electricity consumption prediction model based on land use and interpretable machine learning: A case study of China Green light for bidirectional charging? Unveiling grid repercussions and life cycle impacts Hydrogen production via solid oxide electrolysis: Balancing environmental issues and material criticality MANGOever: An optimization framework for the long-term planning and operations of integrated electric vehicle and building energy systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1