Stephen Aichele , Antony Payton , Andrew C. Robinson , Patrick Rabbitt
{"title":"认知老化中与职业相关的差异:工作类型、技能水平和教育程度的比较效应","authors":"Stephen Aichele , Antony Payton , Andrew C. Robinson , Patrick Rabbitt","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2024.101877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A century of psychometric research has shown that intelligence is robustly associated with occupational status. Despite a rapidly aging global workforce, occupational differences in cognitive decline remain under-investigated. In a large sample of middle-aged and older adults (<em>N</em> = 5542; age 41–97 years; 70.6 % female), we compared age-based trajectories of general fluid cognition across occupational groups (categorized both by specialization area and skill level). Occupational grouping accounted for 18.6 % of variability in baseline cognitive performance and 3.9 % of variability in rates of decline. Cognitive differences across occupational groups generally followed a skill gradient. These differences were largely retained with increasing age—although between-group variability in rates of decline were also present. Moreover, occupation-cognition associations remained significant after adjustment for education (occupation contributed an additional 5.9 % and 1.8 % to explained variation in baseline cognitive performance and decline in performance, respectively). Having more hobbies in later life accounted for an additional 2.7 % and 1.2 % in explained variation for baseline differences and declines in cognition, respectively. These associations were minimally affected by further adjustment for sociodemographic and lifestyle covariates, including retirement status. The marked contrast between the cognitive trajectories of academic professionals vs. those of other occupational groups suggests that long-term immersive intellectual engagement may provide tangible benefits for cognitive aging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 101877"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupation-related differences in cognitive aging: Comparative effects of job type, skill level, and education\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Aichele , Antony Payton , Andrew C. Robinson , Patrick Rabbitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intell.2024.101877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A century of psychometric research has shown that intelligence is robustly associated with occupational status. Despite a rapidly aging global workforce, occupational differences in cognitive decline remain under-investigated. In a large sample of middle-aged and older adults (<em>N</em> = 5542; age 41–97 years; 70.6 % female), we compared age-based trajectories of general fluid cognition across occupational groups (categorized both by specialization area and skill level). Occupational grouping accounted for 18.6 % of variability in baseline cognitive performance and 3.9 % of variability in rates of decline. Cognitive differences across occupational groups generally followed a skill gradient. These differences were largely retained with increasing age—although between-group variability in rates of decline were also present. Moreover, occupation-cognition associations remained significant after adjustment for education (occupation contributed an additional 5.9 % and 1.8 % to explained variation in baseline cognitive performance and decline in performance, respectively). Having more hobbies in later life accounted for an additional 2.7 % and 1.2 % in explained variation for baseline differences and declines in cognition, respectively. These associations were minimally affected by further adjustment for sociodemographic and lifestyle covariates, including retirement status. The marked contrast between the cognitive trajectories of academic professionals vs. those of other occupational groups suggests that long-term immersive intellectual engagement may provide tangible benefits for cognitive aging.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101877\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000710\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000710","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Occupation-related differences in cognitive aging: Comparative effects of job type, skill level, and education
A century of psychometric research has shown that intelligence is robustly associated with occupational status. Despite a rapidly aging global workforce, occupational differences in cognitive decline remain under-investigated. In a large sample of middle-aged and older adults (N = 5542; age 41–97 years; 70.6 % female), we compared age-based trajectories of general fluid cognition across occupational groups (categorized both by specialization area and skill level). Occupational grouping accounted for 18.6 % of variability in baseline cognitive performance and 3.9 % of variability in rates of decline. Cognitive differences across occupational groups generally followed a skill gradient. These differences were largely retained with increasing age—although between-group variability in rates of decline were also present. Moreover, occupation-cognition associations remained significant after adjustment for education (occupation contributed an additional 5.9 % and 1.8 % to explained variation in baseline cognitive performance and decline in performance, respectively). Having more hobbies in later life accounted for an additional 2.7 % and 1.2 % in explained variation for baseline differences and declines in cognition, respectively. These associations were minimally affected by further adjustment for sociodemographic and lifestyle covariates, including retirement status. The marked contrast between the cognitive trajectories of academic professionals vs. those of other occupational groups suggests that long-term immersive intellectual engagement may provide tangible benefits for cognitive aging.
期刊介绍:
This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.