灌浆加固对非穿透性断裂砂岩力学行为的影响研究

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Construction and Building Materials Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139079
Zhongshao Yao , Mingli Li , Shibo Huang , Ming Chang , Zhibin Yang
{"title":"灌浆加固对非穿透性断裂砂岩力学行为的影响研究","authors":"Zhongshao Yao ,&nbsp;Mingli Li ,&nbsp;Shibo Huang ,&nbsp;Ming Chang ,&nbsp;Zhibin Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The grouting reinforcement technology is an essential method to enhance the mechanical performance of fractured rock masses and the effectiveness of reinforcement varies with different grouting materials. To further understand the mechanical improvement capabilities of each grout and the reinforcement mechanisms at the grout-rock interface, this study prepared samples with different grouting materials (sulphoaluminate cement (SAC), ultra-fine cement (UFC), and epoxy resin (EPR)) and the uniaxial compression tests were conducted. Based on these tests, the macro and micro mechanical characteristics of different grouting samples were revealed using particle image velocimetry (PIV), acoustic emission (AE), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The results indicate that grouting helps improve the mechanical performance and deformation resistance of fractured rock masses. It effectively limited lateral displacement of the samples, reduced stress concentration at fracture tips, enhanced shear effects during sample fracture, and altered the crack propagation process and failure modes. Compared to the fractured samples, the peak strength of SAC, UFC, and EPR samples increased by 17.8 %, 23.4 %, and 28.3 %, and the elastic modulus increased by 14.3 %, 7.9 %, and 24.8 %, respectively. Among these, the EPR samples exhibited a similarity in parameter indicators to intact samples of over 85 %, making EPR the optimal grouting material. The degree of grout-rock fusion is the primary factor influencing grouting reinforcement effectiveness. SAC is covering-type cement, UFC is embedded cement, EPR is a fusion material, and the fusion-type materials are more beneficial for improving the mechanical performance of fractured rocks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"453 ","pages":"Article 139079"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the impact of grouting reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of non-penetrating fracture sandstone\",\"authors\":\"Zhongshao Yao ,&nbsp;Mingli Li ,&nbsp;Shibo Huang ,&nbsp;Ming Chang ,&nbsp;Zhibin Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The grouting reinforcement technology is an essential method to enhance the mechanical performance of fractured rock masses and the effectiveness of reinforcement varies with different grouting materials. To further understand the mechanical improvement capabilities of each grout and the reinforcement mechanisms at the grout-rock interface, this study prepared samples with different grouting materials (sulphoaluminate cement (SAC), ultra-fine cement (UFC), and epoxy resin (EPR)) and the uniaxial compression tests were conducted. Based on these tests, the macro and micro mechanical characteristics of different grouting samples were revealed using particle image velocimetry (PIV), acoustic emission (AE), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The results indicate that grouting helps improve the mechanical performance and deformation resistance of fractured rock masses. It effectively limited lateral displacement of the samples, reduced stress concentration at fracture tips, enhanced shear effects during sample fracture, and altered the crack propagation process and failure modes. Compared to the fractured samples, the peak strength of SAC, UFC, and EPR samples increased by 17.8 %, 23.4 %, and 28.3 %, and the elastic modulus increased by 14.3 %, 7.9 %, and 24.8 %, respectively. Among these, the EPR samples exhibited a similarity in parameter indicators to intact samples of over 85 %, making EPR the optimal grouting material. The degree of grout-rock fusion is the primary factor influencing grouting reinforcement effectiveness. SAC is covering-type cement, UFC is embedded cement, EPR is a fusion material, and the fusion-type materials are more beneficial for improving the mechanical performance of fractured rocks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"volume\":\"453 \",\"pages\":\"Article 139079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061824042211\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061824042211","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

灌浆加固技术是提高断裂岩体力学性能的重要方法,不同灌浆材料的加固效果各不相同。为了进一步了解每种灌浆材料的力学改善能力以及灌浆材料与岩石界面的加固机制,本研究制备了不同灌浆材料(硫铝酸盐水泥(SAC)、超细水泥(UFC)和环氧树脂(EPR))的样品,并进行了单轴压缩试验。在这些试验的基础上,利用粒子图像测速仪(PIV)、声发射(AE)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和核磁共振(NMR)揭示了不同灌浆样品的宏观和微观力学特性。结果表明,灌浆有助于改善断裂岩体的机械性能和抗变形能力。它有效地限制了样品的横向位移,减少了断裂尖端的应力集中,增强了样品断裂过程中的剪切效应,并改变了裂纹的扩展过程和破坏模式。与断裂样品相比,SAC、UFC 和 EPR 样品的峰值强度分别提高了 17.8%、23.4% 和 28.3%,弹性模量分别提高了 14.3%、7.9% 和 24.8%。其中,EPR 样品与完整样品的参数指标相似度超过 85%,因此 EPR 是最佳的灌浆材料。灌浆料与岩石的融合度是影响灌浆加固效果的主要因素。SAC 是覆盖型水泥,UFC 是嵌入型水泥,EPR 是熔融型材料,熔融型材料更有利于改善断裂岩石的力学性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study on the impact of grouting reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of non-penetrating fracture sandstone
The grouting reinforcement technology is an essential method to enhance the mechanical performance of fractured rock masses and the effectiveness of reinforcement varies with different grouting materials. To further understand the mechanical improvement capabilities of each grout and the reinforcement mechanisms at the grout-rock interface, this study prepared samples with different grouting materials (sulphoaluminate cement (SAC), ultra-fine cement (UFC), and epoxy resin (EPR)) and the uniaxial compression tests were conducted. Based on these tests, the macro and micro mechanical characteristics of different grouting samples were revealed using particle image velocimetry (PIV), acoustic emission (AE), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The results indicate that grouting helps improve the mechanical performance and deformation resistance of fractured rock masses. It effectively limited lateral displacement of the samples, reduced stress concentration at fracture tips, enhanced shear effects during sample fracture, and altered the crack propagation process and failure modes. Compared to the fractured samples, the peak strength of SAC, UFC, and EPR samples increased by 17.8 %, 23.4 %, and 28.3 %, and the elastic modulus increased by 14.3 %, 7.9 %, and 24.8 %, respectively. Among these, the EPR samples exhibited a similarity in parameter indicators to intact samples of over 85 %, making EPR the optimal grouting material. The degree of grout-rock fusion is the primary factor influencing grouting reinforcement effectiveness. SAC is covering-type cement, UFC is embedded cement, EPR is a fusion material, and the fusion-type materials are more beneficial for improving the mechanical performance of fractured rocks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
期刊最新文献
Durability against cyclic wetting-drying of cement-stabilized loess subgrade for railway in tropical semi-arid regions Lightweight, high-strength, thermal- and sound-insulating reed scraps/portland cement composite using extruded resin particles Concrete mix design: Optimizing recycled asphalt pavement in Portland cement concrete A multidisciplinary evaluation of mixtures of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash and mine tailings for sustainable geotechnical solutions Dynamic splitting tensile properties of crumb rubber modified ultra-high performance engineered cementitious composites (UHP-ECC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1