不同触发方法下 NCM811 高能量密度锂离子电池的热失控和气体生成特性研究

IF 6.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 THERMODYNAMICS Case Studies in Thermal Engineering Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1016/j.csite.2024.105417
Chunjing Lin , Hongtao Yan , Chuang Qi , Jingbo Mao , Li Lao , Yazhou Sun , Tianyi Ma , Dinghong Liu
{"title":"不同触发方法下 NCM811 高能量密度锂离子电池的热失控和气体生成特性研究","authors":"Chunjing Lin ,&nbsp;Hongtao Yan ,&nbsp;Chuang Qi ,&nbsp;Jingbo Mao ,&nbsp;Li Lao ,&nbsp;Yazhou Sun ,&nbsp;Tianyi Ma ,&nbsp;Dinghong Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.csite.2024.105417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Safety concerns, including thermal runaway and gas generation, present significant challenges for high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries. Thermal abuse, a common trigger for thermal runaway, can be induced by various methods, including heating rods, coils, plates, and lasers. This study compares the impacts of three heating techniques—heating rods, coils, and plates—on thermal runaway and gas generation in a commercially used NCM811 lithium-ion battery, which has a high energy density of 280.24 Wh/kg (the latest cylindrical 46950 model). The study found that the heating coil was the most effective, triggering thermal runaway more quickly and at a higher temperature than the heating plate and rod. Gas production analysis revealed that the heating coil method generated significantly more gas, particularly CO<sub>2</sub>, than the other methods. The concentrations of gases produced during thermal runaway (CO, CO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>, and CH<sub>4</sub>) varied by heating method, with the heating coil leading to a more complete battery reaction. The safety evaluation highlighted the hazardous nature of the heating rod method, which produced the widest flammable gas concentration range and the highest explosion risk among the tested heating methods. This study provides critical insights into heating techniques in lithium-ion battery thermal runaway scenarios and offers valuable data for improving safety measures in energy storage systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9658,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 105417"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on thermal runaway and gas generation characteristics of NCM811 high energy density lithium-ion batteries under different triggering methods\",\"authors\":\"Chunjing Lin ,&nbsp;Hongtao Yan ,&nbsp;Chuang Qi ,&nbsp;Jingbo Mao ,&nbsp;Li Lao ,&nbsp;Yazhou Sun ,&nbsp;Tianyi Ma ,&nbsp;Dinghong Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csite.2024.105417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Safety concerns, including thermal runaway and gas generation, present significant challenges for high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries. Thermal abuse, a common trigger for thermal runaway, can be induced by various methods, including heating rods, coils, plates, and lasers. This study compares the impacts of three heating techniques—heating rods, coils, and plates—on thermal runaway and gas generation in a commercially used NCM811 lithium-ion battery, which has a high energy density of 280.24 Wh/kg (the latest cylindrical 46950 model). The study found that the heating coil was the most effective, triggering thermal runaway more quickly and at a higher temperature than the heating plate and rod. Gas production analysis revealed that the heating coil method generated significantly more gas, particularly CO<sub>2</sub>, than the other methods. The concentrations of gases produced during thermal runaway (CO, CO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>, and CH<sub>4</sub>) varied by heating method, with the heating coil leading to a more complete battery reaction. The safety evaluation highlighted the hazardous nature of the heating rod method, which produced the widest flammable gas concentration range and the highest explosion risk among the tested heating methods. This study provides critical insights into heating techniques in lithium-ion battery thermal runaway scenarios and offers valuable data for improving safety measures in energy storage systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X24014485\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"THERMODYNAMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X24014485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

安全问题,包括热失控和气体产生,给高能量密度锂离子电池带来了重大挑战。热滥用是热失控的常见诱因,可通过各种方法诱发,包括加热棒、线圈、板和激光。本研究比较了三种加热技术(加热棒、线圈和极板)对商用 NCM811 锂离子电池热失控和气体产生的影响,该电池的能量密度高达 280.24 Wh/kg(最新的圆柱形 46950 型)。研究发现,与加热板和加热棒相比,加热线圈最有效,能更快、更高温度地触发热失控。气体产生分析表明,加热线圈法产生的气体,尤其是二氧化碳,明显多于其他方法。热失控期间产生的气体(CO、CO2、H2 和 CH4)的浓度因加热方法而异,加热线圈导致更完全的电池反应。安全评估强调了加热棒方法的危险性,在测试的加热方法中,加热棒方法产生的可燃气体浓度范围最广,爆炸风险最高。这项研究为锂离子电池热失控情况下的加热技术提供了重要见解,并为改进储能系统的安全措施提供了宝贵数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research on thermal runaway and gas generation characteristics of NCM811 high energy density lithium-ion batteries under different triggering methods
Safety concerns, including thermal runaway and gas generation, present significant challenges for high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries. Thermal abuse, a common trigger for thermal runaway, can be induced by various methods, including heating rods, coils, plates, and lasers. This study compares the impacts of three heating techniques—heating rods, coils, and plates—on thermal runaway and gas generation in a commercially used NCM811 lithium-ion battery, which has a high energy density of 280.24 Wh/kg (the latest cylindrical 46950 model). The study found that the heating coil was the most effective, triggering thermal runaway more quickly and at a higher temperature than the heating plate and rod. Gas production analysis revealed that the heating coil method generated significantly more gas, particularly CO2, than the other methods. The concentrations of gases produced during thermal runaway (CO, CO2, H2, and CH4) varied by heating method, with the heating coil leading to a more complete battery reaction. The safety evaluation highlighted the hazardous nature of the heating rod method, which produced the widest flammable gas concentration range and the highest explosion risk among the tested heating methods. This study provides critical insights into heating techniques in lithium-ion battery thermal runaway scenarios and offers valuable data for improving safety measures in energy storage systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
812
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Case Studies in Thermal Engineering provides a forum for the rapid publication of short, structured Case Studies in Thermal Engineering and related Short Communications. It provides an essential compendium of case studies for researchers and practitioners in the field of thermal engineering and others who are interested in aspects of thermal engineering cases that could affect other engineering processes. The journal not only publishes new and novel case studies, but also provides a forum for the publication of high quality descriptions of classic thermal engineering problems. The scope of the journal includes case studies of thermal engineering problems in components, devices and systems using existing experimental and numerical techniques in the areas of mechanical, aerospace, chemical, medical, thermal management for electronics, heat exchangers, regeneration, solar thermal energy, thermal storage, building energy conservation, and power generation. Case studies of thermal problems in other areas will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Numerical analysis and experimental study of two-phase flow pattern and pressure drop characteristics in internally microfin tubes A novel high-temperature water cooling system utilizing cascaded cold energy from underground water plants in northern China Combustion characteristics of a 660 MW tangentially fired pulverized coal boiler considering different loads, burner combinations and horizontal deflection angles Performance evaluation of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with two-stage compression and intercooling Research on the mechanical and thermal properties of potting adhesive with different fillers of h-BN and MPCM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1