Gabriel Salako , Andrey Zaitsev , Bibiana Betancur-Corredor , David J. Russell
{"title":"蚯蚓生态类别分布建模和空间预测揭示其生境和环境偏好","authors":"Gabriel Salako , Andrey Zaitsev , Bibiana Betancur-Corredor , David J. Russell","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Earthworms are one of the important soil animals and have been generally described as soil engineers. Knowledge on environmental conditions driving the distribution and population of this soil animal and the habitat which support these conditions especially at the ecological level is required to understand their responses to these environmental conditions at different habitats so as to guide its usage as bio indicator of soil quality and health. In this study we use RandomForest (RF), a machine learning algorithm to model species distribution, density/abundance based (SDM/SAM) and predict the biodiversity distribution (richness and density, ind.m<sup>−2</sup>) of three basic earthworms ecological categories: epigeic, endogeic and anecic (including the epi-anecic subcategory) across soil and climate variables at multiple habitat type/land uses in Germany. Our study shows there are spatial/ geographic variation in the distribution of the species richness and density among the three earthworms’ ecological categories. Also their environmental and habitat preferences are equally different, while epigeic species are predicted to be climate driven mostly in forests, endogeics are predicted to be the most diverse (in richness and density), but are mostly driven by soil textural contents (clay and silt) and found primarily in arable and grassland. Vineyard and crop flood plain are predicted to be suitable and the preferred habitat for anecics/epi-anecics. This study also identify optimum environmental gradient at which the species density is at the peak in each of the earthworm’s ecological category which would not only provide guide on soil biodiversity monitoring but also the soil health status.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 112832"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling and spatial prediction of earthworms ecological-categories distribution reveal their habitat and environmental preferences\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Salako , Andrey Zaitsev , Bibiana Betancur-Corredor , David J. Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Earthworms are one of the important soil animals and have been generally described as soil engineers. Knowledge on environmental conditions driving the distribution and population of this soil animal and the habitat which support these conditions especially at the ecological level is required to understand their responses to these environmental conditions at different habitats so as to guide its usage as bio indicator of soil quality and health. In this study we use RandomForest (RF), a machine learning algorithm to model species distribution, density/abundance based (SDM/SAM) and predict the biodiversity distribution (richness and density, ind.m<sup>−2</sup>) of three basic earthworms ecological categories: epigeic, endogeic and anecic (including the epi-anecic subcategory) across soil and climate variables at multiple habitat type/land uses in Germany. Our study shows there are spatial/ geographic variation in the distribution of the species richness and density among the three earthworms’ ecological categories. Also their environmental and habitat preferences are equally different, while epigeic species are predicted to be climate driven mostly in forests, endogeics are predicted to be the most diverse (in richness and density), but are mostly driven by soil textural contents (clay and silt) and found primarily in arable and grassland. Vineyard and crop flood plain are predicted to be suitable and the preferred habitat for anecics/epi-anecics. This study also identify optimum environmental gradient at which the species density is at the peak in each of the earthworm’s ecological category which would not only provide guide on soil biodiversity monitoring but also the soil health status.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24012895\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24012895","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modelling and spatial prediction of earthworms ecological-categories distribution reveal their habitat and environmental preferences
Earthworms are one of the important soil animals and have been generally described as soil engineers. Knowledge on environmental conditions driving the distribution and population of this soil animal and the habitat which support these conditions especially at the ecological level is required to understand their responses to these environmental conditions at different habitats so as to guide its usage as bio indicator of soil quality and health. In this study we use RandomForest (RF), a machine learning algorithm to model species distribution, density/abundance based (SDM/SAM) and predict the biodiversity distribution (richness and density, ind.m−2) of three basic earthworms ecological categories: epigeic, endogeic and anecic (including the epi-anecic subcategory) across soil and climate variables at multiple habitat type/land uses in Germany. Our study shows there are spatial/ geographic variation in the distribution of the species richness and density among the three earthworms’ ecological categories. Also their environmental and habitat preferences are equally different, while epigeic species are predicted to be climate driven mostly in forests, endogeics are predicted to be the most diverse (in richness and density), but are mostly driven by soil textural contents (clay and silt) and found primarily in arable and grassland. Vineyard and crop flood plain are predicted to be suitable and the preferred habitat for anecics/epi-anecics. This study also identify optimum environmental gradient at which the species density is at the peak in each of the earthworm’s ecological category which would not only provide guide on soil biodiversity monitoring but also the soil health status.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.