了解波浪能技术性能水平评估的不确定性

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable Energy Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2024.121832
Ali Trueworthy , Aeron Roach , Bryony DuPont , Thomas Mathai , Jesse Roberts , Jochem Weber , Robert Preus , Benjamin D. Maurer
{"title":"了解波浪能技术性能水平评估的不确定性","authors":"Ali Trueworthy ,&nbsp;Aeron Roach ,&nbsp;Bryony DuPont ,&nbsp;Thomas Mathai ,&nbsp;Jesse Roberts ,&nbsp;Jochem Weber ,&nbsp;Robert Preus ,&nbsp;Benjamin D. Maurer","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The design of wave energy converters (WECs) has been explored with interest, with varying design concepts emerging across both research and industry. One critical element that governs the speed of adoption is the <em>performance</em> of a WEC concept. WEC performance has been assessed using the Technology Performance Level (TPL) assessment, which provides designers with a quantitative score, situating a grid-scale WEC concept on a scale from 1 to 9. The TPL assessment is designed to be used during design iteration, when a WEC concept is fully ideated, to enable designers to consider potential means of improving the downstream performance of the concept. One concern that may be slowing developers’ adoption of TPL is the inherent uncertainty in the assessment, and how uncertainty in the individual questions may contribute to the final score. In this work, we quantify the uncertainty present in the assessment using both traditional mathematical operations and a Monte Carlo simulation. Results show areas of improvement of the TPL assessment, enabling TPL practitioners and users to understand with more accuracy those design elements that can be improved to impact device performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 121832"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the uncertainty in the technical performance level assessment for wave energy\",\"authors\":\"Ali Trueworthy ,&nbsp;Aeron Roach ,&nbsp;Bryony DuPont ,&nbsp;Thomas Mathai ,&nbsp;Jesse Roberts ,&nbsp;Jochem Weber ,&nbsp;Robert Preus ,&nbsp;Benjamin D. Maurer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The design of wave energy converters (WECs) has been explored with interest, with varying design concepts emerging across both research and industry. One critical element that governs the speed of adoption is the <em>performance</em> of a WEC concept. WEC performance has been assessed using the Technology Performance Level (TPL) assessment, which provides designers with a quantitative score, situating a grid-scale WEC concept on a scale from 1 to 9. The TPL assessment is designed to be used during design iteration, when a WEC concept is fully ideated, to enable designers to consider potential means of improving the downstream performance of the concept. One concern that may be slowing developers’ adoption of TPL is the inherent uncertainty in the assessment, and how uncertainty in the individual questions may contribute to the final score. In this work, we quantify the uncertainty present in the assessment using both traditional mathematical operations and a Monte Carlo simulation. Results show areas of improvement of the TPL assessment, enabling TPL practitioners and users to understand with more accuracy those design elements that can be improved to impact device performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable Energy\",\"volume\":\"237 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124019001\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124019001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们对波浪能转换器(WECs)的设计进行了饶有兴趣的探索,在研究和工业领域都出现了不同的设计理念。影响采用速度的一个关键因素是波浪能转换器概念的性能。WEC 性能的评估采用技术性能等级 (TPL) 评估,该评估为设计人员提供了一个量化分数,将电网规模的 WEC 概念置于 1 到 9 的等级中。TPL 评估的目的是在设计迭代过程中,即在充分构思水力发电概念时使用,使设计人员能够考虑改善概念下游性能的潜在方法。可能阻碍开发人员采用 TPL 的一个问题是评估中固有的不确定性,以及单个问题的不确定性对最终得分的影响。在这项工作中,我们使用传统数学运算和蒙特卡罗模拟对评估中存在的不确定性进行了量化。结果显示了 TPL 评估的改进领域,使 TPL 从业人员和用户能够更准确地了解那些可以改进以影响设备性能的设计元素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the uncertainty in the technical performance level assessment for wave energy
The design of wave energy converters (WECs) has been explored with interest, with varying design concepts emerging across both research and industry. One critical element that governs the speed of adoption is the performance of a WEC concept. WEC performance has been assessed using the Technology Performance Level (TPL) assessment, which provides designers with a quantitative score, situating a grid-scale WEC concept on a scale from 1 to 9. The TPL assessment is designed to be used during design iteration, when a WEC concept is fully ideated, to enable designers to consider potential means of improving the downstream performance of the concept. One concern that may be slowing developers’ adoption of TPL is the inherent uncertainty in the assessment, and how uncertainty in the individual questions may contribute to the final score. In this work, we quantify the uncertainty present in the assessment using both traditional mathematical operations and a Monte Carlo simulation. Results show areas of improvement of the TPL assessment, enabling TPL practitioners and users to understand with more accuracy those design elements that can be improved to impact device performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
1955
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices. As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.
期刊最新文献
Broadband efficient light-absorbing SS-PPy@CNT membranes prepared by electrochemical deposition for photothermal conversion Multi-objective optimization of geothermal heating systems based on thermal economy and environmental impact evaluation Dynamic response and power performance of a combined semi-submersible floating wind turbine and point absorber wave energy converter array Rural energy poverty alleviation in OECD nations: An integrated analysis of renewable energy, green taxation, and the United Nations agenda 2030 Spectral correction of photovoltaic module electrical properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1