受硫酸盐侵蚀的聚乙烯纤维增强轻质工程土工聚合物复合材料的材料表征和热性能

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Construction and Building Materials Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139156
Ali Raza , Abdelatif Salmi , Mohamed Hechmi El Ouni , Nejib Ghazouani , Bilal Ahmed , Wensu Chen
{"title":"受硫酸盐侵蚀的聚乙烯纤维增强轻质工程土工聚合物复合材料的材料表征和热性能","authors":"Ali Raza ,&nbsp;Abdelatif Salmi ,&nbsp;Mohamed Hechmi El Ouni ,&nbsp;Nejib Ghazouani ,&nbsp;Bilal Ahmed ,&nbsp;Wensu Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The purpose of this research is to use different amounts of fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) to replace ordinary Portland cement (OPC) in polyethylene (PE) fiber-reinforced lightweight engineered geopolymers (LEGP). The mechanical characteristics and durability of these composites are examined, and the results were compared with lightweight engineered cementitious composites (LECC). Expanded glass aggregates were used to produce lightweight LEGP and LECC composites. The composites were exposed to a 5 % <span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi><msub><mrow><mi>a</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mi>S</mi><msub><mrow><mi>O</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> solution for up to 180 days. The performance of LEGP and LECC specimens under normal and sulfate environments was assessed using a variety of tests and analyses, including evaluations of relative slump, density, compressive stress-strain behavior, flexural strength, load-deflection response, split tensile strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity, initial surface absorption, mass change, and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Microstructural and mineralogical analysis of the composite matrix was conducted using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential thermogravimetry (DTG) were employed to evaluate the thermal stability of the composites. The results showed that in both normal and sulfate conditions, LEGP specimens with 100 % GGBS showed higher residual compressive, flexural, and split tensile strengths while having minimum initial surface absorption and mass loss as compared with LECC specimens. MIP analysis showed that LEGP mixes with 100 % FA exhibited a more notable increase in pore volume under sulfate exposure leading to reduced performance. LECC specimens subjected to 5 % <span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi><msub><mrow><mi>a</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mi>S</mi><msub><mrow><mi>O</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> solution showed peaks of quartz, mullite, portlandite, and ettringite at higher intensities with calcite and nepheline minerals at lower intensities, while LEGP samples subjected to 5 % <span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi><msub><mrow><mi>a</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mi>S</mi><msub><mrow><mi>O</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> solution were characterized by the formation of quartz, mullite, portlandite, calcite, zeolite, gypsum, and ettringite peaks. FTIR and DTG results showed that <span><math><mrow><mi>C</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>S</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>H</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mi>Ca</mi><msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>OH</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> were transformed into gypsum and mullite after a sulfate attack for 180 days.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"455 ","pages":"Article 139156"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Material characterization and thermal performance of polyethylene fiber-reinforced lightweight engineered geopolymer composites subjected to sulfate attacks\",\"authors\":\"Ali Raza ,&nbsp;Abdelatif Salmi ,&nbsp;Mohamed Hechmi El Ouni ,&nbsp;Nejib Ghazouani ,&nbsp;Bilal Ahmed ,&nbsp;Wensu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The purpose of this research is to use different amounts of fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) to replace ordinary Portland cement (OPC) in polyethylene (PE) fiber-reinforced lightweight engineered geopolymers (LEGP). The mechanical characteristics and durability of these composites are examined, and the results were compared with lightweight engineered cementitious composites (LECC). Expanded glass aggregates were used to produce lightweight LEGP and LECC composites. The composites were exposed to a 5 % <span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi><msub><mrow><mi>a</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mi>S</mi><msub><mrow><mi>O</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> solution for up to 180 days. The performance of LEGP and LECC specimens under normal and sulfate environments was assessed using a variety of tests and analyses, including evaluations of relative slump, density, compressive stress-strain behavior, flexural strength, load-deflection response, split tensile strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity, initial surface absorption, mass change, and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Microstructural and mineralogical analysis of the composite matrix was conducted using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential thermogravimetry (DTG) were employed to evaluate the thermal stability of the composites. The results showed that in both normal and sulfate conditions, LEGP specimens with 100 % GGBS showed higher residual compressive, flexural, and split tensile strengths while having minimum initial surface absorption and mass loss as compared with LECC specimens. MIP analysis showed that LEGP mixes with 100 % FA exhibited a more notable increase in pore volume under sulfate exposure leading to reduced performance. LECC specimens subjected to 5 % <span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi><msub><mrow><mi>a</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mi>S</mi><msub><mrow><mi>O</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> solution showed peaks of quartz, mullite, portlandite, and ettringite at higher intensities with calcite and nepheline minerals at lower intensities, while LEGP samples subjected to 5 % <span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi><msub><mrow><mi>a</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mi>S</mi><msub><mrow><mi>O</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> solution were characterized by the formation of quartz, mullite, portlandite, calcite, zeolite, gypsum, and ettringite peaks. FTIR and DTG results showed that <span><math><mrow><mi>C</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>S</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>H</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mi>Ca</mi><msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>OH</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> were transformed into gypsum and mullite after a sulfate attack for 180 days.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"volume\":\"455 \",\"pages\":\"Article 139156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061824042983\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061824042983","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是在聚乙烯(PE)纤维增强轻质工程土工聚合物(LEGP)中使用不同量的粉煤灰(FA)和磨细高炉矿渣(GGBS)来替代普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)。研究了这些复合材料的机械特性和耐久性,并将结果与轻质工程水泥基复合材料(LECC)进行了比较。膨胀玻璃集料用于生产轻质 LEGP 和 LECC 复合材料。将这些复合材料暴露在 5% 的 Na2SO4 溶液中长达 180 天。采用各种测试和分析方法对 LEGP 和 LECC 试样在正常和硫酸盐环境下的性能进行了评估,包括相对坍落度、密度、压缩应力-应变行为、抗弯强度、载荷-挠度响应、劈裂拉伸强度、超声波脉冲速度、初始表面吸收、质量变化和汞侵入孔隙模拟 (MIP) 等方面的评估。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、X 射线衍射(XRD)和傅立叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)对复合基质进行了微观结构和矿物学分析。热重分析法(TGA)和差热分析法(DTG)用于评估复合材料的热稳定性。结果表明,在正常和硫酸盐条件下,与 LECC 试样相比,含有 100% GGBS 的 LEGP 试样显示出更高的残余抗压、抗弯和劈裂拉伸强度,同时初始表面吸收和质量损失最小。MIP 分析表明,含 100% FA 的 LEGP 混合料在硫酸盐暴露下孔隙体积增加更明显,导致性能下降。在 5 %Na2SO4 溶液中的 LECC 试样显示出较高强度的石英、莫来石、硅酸盐和埃曲石峰,以及较低强度的方解石和霞石矿物,而在 5 %Na2SO4 溶液中的 LEGP 试样则显示出石英、莫来石、硅酸盐、方解石、沸石、石膏和埃曲石峰的形成。傅立叶变换红外光谱和 DTG 结果表明,C-S-H 和 Ca(OH)2 在硫酸盐侵蚀 180 天后转化为石膏和莫来石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Material characterization and thermal performance of polyethylene fiber-reinforced lightweight engineered geopolymer composites subjected to sulfate attacks
The purpose of this research is to use different amounts of fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) to replace ordinary Portland cement (OPC) in polyethylene (PE) fiber-reinforced lightweight engineered geopolymers (LEGP). The mechanical characteristics and durability of these composites are examined, and the results were compared with lightweight engineered cementitious composites (LECC). Expanded glass aggregates were used to produce lightweight LEGP and LECC composites. The composites were exposed to a 5 % Na2SO4 solution for up to 180 days. The performance of LEGP and LECC specimens under normal and sulfate environments was assessed using a variety of tests and analyses, including evaluations of relative slump, density, compressive stress-strain behavior, flexural strength, load-deflection response, split tensile strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity, initial surface absorption, mass change, and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Microstructural and mineralogical analysis of the composite matrix was conducted using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential thermogravimetry (DTG) were employed to evaluate the thermal stability of the composites. The results showed that in both normal and sulfate conditions, LEGP specimens with 100 % GGBS showed higher residual compressive, flexural, and split tensile strengths while having minimum initial surface absorption and mass loss as compared with LECC specimens. MIP analysis showed that LEGP mixes with 100 % FA exhibited a more notable increase in pore volume under sulfate exposure leading to reduced performance. LECC specimens subjected to 5 % Na2SO4 solution showed peaks of quartz, mullite, portlandite, and ettringite at higher intensities with calcite and nepheline minerals at lower intensities, while LEGP samples subjected to 5 % Na2SO4 solution were characterized by the formation of quartz, mullite, portlandite, calcite, zeolite, gypsum, and ettringite peaks. FTIR and DTG results showed that CSH and Ca(OH)2 were transformed into gypsum and mullite after a sulfate attack for 180 days.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
期刊最新文献
Durability against cyclic wetting-drying of cement-stabilized loess subgrade for railway in tropical semi-arid regions Lightweight, high-strength, thermal- and sound-insulating reed scraps/portland cement composite using extruded resin particles Concrete mix design: Optimizing recycled asphalt pavement in Portland cement concrete A multidisciplinary evaluation of mixtures of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash and mine tailings for sustainable geotechnical solutions Dynamic splitting tensile properties of crumb rubber modified ultra-high performance engineered cementitious composites (UHP-ECC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1