建筑行业可持续性的成本--以比利时家庭住宅为例

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144240
J. Douhard, B. Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie
{"title":"建筑行业可持续性的成本--以比利时家庭住宅为例","authors":"J. Douhard, B. Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The housing sector is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and a large body of literature has focused on measuring the environmental impact of houses, using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. This literature reaches the conclusion that alternative construction materials should be used to reduce the environmental impact of buildings. While such research provides essential knowledge on the carbon footprint of the housing sector, few studies take into account the economic side of the issue. This paper addresses this gap by calculating the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) of houses and matching the results with the LCA stages. The methodology is developed for two reference houses in Belgium. Considering all elements and materials used in the construction process, this approach allows a comparison of each house’s elements based on the required investment to abate their carbon footprint. The most striking results are that <span><span>(1)</span></span> the operational stage (i.e., the use of houses) accounts for about 65% of the total carbon impact of a house; (2) a 1€ investment in sustainable materials induces a drop of 1 to 1.3 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq; (3) this effect is heterogeneous across materials, with the highest returns obtained for external walls (-6 KgCO<sub>2</sub>eq) and windows (-3 to -6 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq) and the lowest returns obtained for ground floor (-0.3 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq).","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cost of sustainability in the construction sector – the case of family houses in Belgium\",\"authors\":\"J. Douhard, B. Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The housing sector is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and a large body of literature has focused on measuring the environmental impact of houses, using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. This literature reaches the conclusion that alternative construction materials should be used to reduce the environmental impact of buildings. While such research provides essential knowledge on the carbon footprint of the housing sector, few studies take into account the economic side of the issue. This paper addresses this gap by calculating the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) of houses and matching the results with the LCA stages. The methodology is developed for two reference houses in Belgium. Considering all elements and materials used in the construction process, this approach allows a comparison of each house’s elements based on the required investment to abate their carbon footprint. The most striking results are that <span><span>(1)</span></span> the operational stage (i.e., the use of houses) accounts for about 65% of the total carbon impact of a house; (2) a 1€ investment in sustainable materials induces a drop of 1 to 1.3 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq; (3) this effect is heterogeneous across materials, with the highest returns obtained for external walls (-6 KgCO<sub>2</sub>eq) and windows (-3 to -6 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq) and the lowest returns obtained for ground floor (-0.3 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq).\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144240\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144240","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

住房部门是温室气体排放的主要贡献者,大量文献都集中在使用生命周期评估(LCA)方法来衡量住房对环境的影响。这些文献得出的结论是,应使用替代建筑材料来减少建筑物对环境的影响。虽然这些研究提供了有关住房领域碳足迹的基本知识,但很少有研究考虑到这一问题的经济方面。本文通过计算房屋的生命周期成本 (LCC),并将结果与生命周期评估阶段相匹配,填补了这一空白。该方法是针对比利时的两栋参考房屋开发的。考虑到建造过程中使用的所有元素和材料,这种方法可以根据减少碳足迹所需的投资对每栋房屋的元素进行比较。最显著的结果是:(1) 运行阶段(即房屋的使用)约占房屋总碳影响的 65%;(2) 在可持续材料上投资 1 欧元可减少 1 至 1.3 千克 CO2eq;(3) 不同材料的效果不同,外墙(-6 千克 CO2eq)和窗户(-3 至-6 千克 CO2eq)的回报率最高,底层(-0.3 千克 CO2eq)的回报率最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The cost of sustainability in the construction sector – the case of family houses in Belgium
The housing sector is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and a large body of literature has focused on measuring the environmental impact of houses, using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. This literature reaches the conclusion that alternative construction materials should be used to reduce the environmental impact of buildings. While such research provides essential knowledge on the carbon footprint of the housing sector, few studies take into account the economic side of the issue. This paper addresses this gap by calculating the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) of houses and matching the results with the LCA stages. The methodology is developed for two reference houses in Belgium. Considering all elements and materials used in the construction process, this approach allows a comparison of each house’s elements based on the required investment to abate their carbon footprint. The most striking results are that (1) the operational stage (i.e., the use of houses) accounts for about 65% of the total carbon impact of a house; (2) a 1€ investment in sustainable materials induces a drop of 1 to 1.3 kgCO2eq; (3) this effect is heterogeneous across materials, with the highest returns obtained for external walls (-6 KgCO2eq) and windows (-3 to -6 kgCO2eq) and the lowest returns obtained for ground floor (-0.3 kgCO2eq).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
Communicating default changes to hotel room cleaning without reducing guest satisfaction INTRODUCING THE LIFECYCLE PERSPECTIVE TO INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM DESIGN: The Innovation Ecosystem Clock Model Traversing the Jevons Paradox: A Study on the Dual Role of Residential Photovoltaic Systems in Electricity Conservation and Increased Consumption in an Emerging Economy Expedient, metal-, extraction- and generally purification-free, temperature- and solvent-directed oxidation of diaryl sulfides using t-BuOCl Coupling coordination between carbon storage protection in alpine wetlands and SDGs: A case study of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1