开发并验证开源自动排便量表。

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.022
Kristoffer Mazanti Cold, Amihai Heen, Anishan Vamadevan, Andreas Slot Vilmann, Lars Konge, Morten Rasmussen, Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen
{"title":"开发并验证开源自动排便量表。","authors":"Kristoffer Mazanti Cold, Amihai Heen, Anishan Vamadevan, Andreas Slot Vilmann, Lars Konge, Morten Rasmussen, Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Insufficient bowel preparation accounts for up to 42% of missed adenomas in colonoscopy. However, major analysis programs found no correlation between adenoma detection rate and the human-rated Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), indicating limitations of the scale. We therefore aimed to develop an open-source automatic bowel preparation scale (OSABPS) based on artificial intelligence that is correlated to the polyp detection rate (PDR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>OSABPS was trained on 50,000 frames from 20 colonoscopies from three hospitals. It involved quantifying the presence of fecal matter within the colonoscopy frames, using an approach termed the fecal ratio - the proportion of pixels identified as feces (F) relative to those identified as mucosal tissue (M) (OSABPS = F/M) - thereby making 0 the optimal score indicating a perfect cleansing. Youden's J was used to set the threshold, as it determines the optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity. The algorithm was then tested on 1,405 colonoscopies from three hospitals (internal validation), and 5,525 frames from a public colonoscopy database (Nerthus, external validation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal validation: OSABPS correlated significantly with BBPS (Pearson's r = -.42, P<.001). A threshold of .09 OSABPS was determined using Youden's J. PDR was higher for colonoscopies below the threshold of Youden's J (Two proportion z-test, P<.001). External validation: OSABPS correlated significantly with BBPS (Pearson's r = -.70, P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OSABPS can automatically, instantly and without human bias assess bowel preparation quality. Colonoscopies with an OSABPS > .09 should be considered for reexamination. OSABPS' open-source nature allows free implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of the Open-Source Automatic Bowel Preparation Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Kristoffer Mazanti Cold, Amihai Heen, Anishan Vamadevan, Andreas Slot Vilmann, Lars Konge, Morten Rasmussen, Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Insufficient bowel preparation accounts for up to 42% of missed adenomas in colonoscopy. However, major analysis programs found no correlation between adenoma detection rate and the human-rated Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), indicating limitations of the scale. We therefore aimed to develop an open-source automatic bowel preparation scale (OSABPS) based on artificial intelligence that is correlated to the polyp detection rate (PDR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>OSABPS was trained on 50,000 frames from 20 colonoscopies from three hospitals. It involved quantifying the presence of fecal matter within the colonoscopy frames, using an approach termed the fecal ratio - the proportion of pixels identified as feces (F) relative to those identified as mucosal tissue (M) (OSABPS = F/M) - thereby making 0 the optimal score indicating a perfect cleansing. Youden's J was used to set the threshold, as it determines the optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity. The algorithm was then tested on 1,405 colonoscopies from three hospitals (internal validation), and 5,525 frames from a public colonoscopy database (Nerthus, external validation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal validation: OSABPS correlated significantly with BBPS (Pearson's r = -.42, P<.001). A threshold of .09 OSABPS was determined using Youden's J. PDR was higher for colonoscopies below the threshold of Youden's J (Two proportion z-test, P<.001). External validation: OSABPS correlated significantly with BBPS (Pearson's r = -.70, P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OSABPS can automatically, instantly and without human bias assess bowel preparation quality. Colonoscopies with an OSABPS > .09 should be considered for reexamination. OSABPS' open-source nature allows free implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.022\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在结肠镜检查中,肠道准备不足导致的腺瘤漏检率高达 42%。然而,主要分析程序发现腺瘤检出率与人工评定的波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)之间没有相关性,这表明该量表存在局限性。因此,我们旨在开发一种基于人工智能的开源自动肠道准备量表(OSABPS),该量表与息肉检出率(PDR)相关:方法:OSABPS 在三家医院 20 次结肠镜检查的 50,000 帧图像上进行训练。方法:OSABPS 是在三家医院 20 次结肠镜检查的 50,000 个图像上进行训练的,其中包括对结肠镜图像中粪便的存在进行量化,使用一种称为粪便比率的方法--即被识别为粪便(F)的像素与被识别为粘膜组织(M)的像素的比例(OSABPS = F/M)--从而使 0 分成为表示完全清洁的最佳分数。尤登 J 用来设定阈值,因为它决定了灵敏度和特异性之间的最佳平衡。随后,该算法在三家医院的 1,405 例结肠镜检查(内部验证)和公共结肠镜检查数据库(Nerthus,外部验证)的 5,525 帧图像上进行了测试:内部验证:结果:内部验证:OSABPS 与 BBPS 有明显相关性(Pearson's r = -.42, PConclusions:OSABPS 可以自动、即时、无人为偏差地评估肠道准备质量。OSABPS > .09 的结肠镜检查应考虑重新检查。OSABPS 的开源性质允许免费实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of the Open-Source Automatic Bowel Preparation Scale.

Background and aims: Insufficient bowel preparation accounts for up to 42% of missed adenomas in colonoscopy. However, major analysis programs found no correlation between adenoma detection rate and the human-rated Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), indicating limitations of the scale. We therefore aimed to develop an open-source automatic bowel preparation scale (OSABPS) based on artificial intelligence that is correlated to the polyp detection rate (PDR).

Methods: OSABPS was trained on 50,000 frames from 20 colonoscopies from three hospitals. It involved quantifying the presence of fecal matter within the colonoscopy frames, using an approach termed the fecal ratio - the proportion of pixels identified as feces (F) relative to those identified as mucosal tissue (M) (OSABPS = F/M) - thereby making 0 the optimal score indicating a perfect cleansing. Youden's J was used to set the threshold, as it determines the optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity. The algorithm was then tested on 1,405 colonoscopies from three hospitals (internal validation), and 5,525 frames from a public colonoscopy database (Nerthus, external validation).

Results: Internal validation: OSABPS correlated significantly with BBPS (Pearson's r = -.42, P<.001). A threshold of .09 OSABPS was determined using Youden's J. PDR was higher for colonoscopies below the threshold of Youden's J (Two proportion z-test, P<.001). External validation: OSABPS correlated significantly with BBPS (Pearson's r = -.70, P<.001).

Conclusions: OSABPS can automatically, instantly and without human bias assess bowel preparation quality. Colonoscopies with an OSABPS > .09 should be considered for reexamination. OSABPS' open-source nature allows free implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Management of Patients with Colorectal Intramucosal Carcinoma Compared to High-Grade Dysplasia and T1 Colorectal Cancer. Development and validation of the Open-Source Automatic Bowel Preparation Scale. Digital single-operator cholangioscopy for difficult anastomotic biliary strictures in living donor liver transplantation recipients after failure of standard ERCP: SPYPASS-2 study. Identification of risk factors associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with easy cannulation: A prospective multicenter observational study. Interobserver Agreement in Dysplasia Grading of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Performance of Kyoto Guidelines and Optimization of Endomicroscopy Biomarkers through Pathology Reclassification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1