Matthew Leupold, Wei Chen, Ashwini K Esnakula, Wendy L Frankel, Stacey Culp, Philip A Hart, Ahmed Abdelbaki, Zarine K Shah, Erica Park, Peter Lee, Mitchell L Ramsey, Samuel Han, Hamza Shah, Jordan Burlen, Georgios I Papachristou, Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate, Mary Dillhoff, Jordan M Cloyd, Timothy M Pawlik, Somashekar G Krishna
{"title":"导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤增生异常分级的观察者间一致性:京都指南的执行情况以及通过病理学重新分类优化内窥镜生物标记物。","authors":"Matthew Leupold, Wei Chen, Ashwini K Esnakula, Wendy L Frankel, Stacey Culp, Philip A Hart, Ahmed Abdelbaki, Zarine K Shah, Erica Park, Peter Lee, Mitchell L Ramsey, Samuel Han, Hamza Shah, Jordan Burlen, Georgios I Papachristou, Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate, Mary Dillhoff, Jordan M Cloyd, Timothy M Pawlik, Somashekar G Krishna","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Interobserver agreement (IOA) among pancreaticobiliary (PB) pathologists in evaluating high-grade dysplasia and/or invasive carcinoma (HGD-IC) of IPMNs remains understudied. EUS-guided needle-based confocal endomicroscopy (nCLE) can evaluate papillary architecture in branch-duct (BD)-IPMNs. We assessed IOA among PB pathologists in classifying dysplasia in resected IPMNs and compared the performance of the Kyoto guidelines' high-risk stigmata (HRS) and pre-surgical EUS-nCLE against reclassified pathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects in prospective clinical trials (2015-2023) with resected IPMNs were included. Blinded PB-pathologists independently reviewed histopathology, achieving a consensus diagnosis. The accuracy of cyst fluid next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis, EUS-nCLE, and Kyoto-HRS in predicting HGD-IC was compared with the reclassified pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 64 subjects, 25 (39%) exhibited HGD-IC (17 HGD, 8 IC). Disagreements occurred in 14% of cases with substantial IOA (kappa=0.70; 95%CI: 0.53-0.88) between two PB-pathologists for differentiating HGD-IC vs. low-grade dysplasia. To detect HGD-IC, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Kyoto-HRS and EUS-nCLE were 52%, 95%, 78%, and 68%, 87%, 80%, respectively. Integrating nCLE with Kyoto-HRS improved sensitivity to 80%, with specificity and accuracy at 82% and 81%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of NGS (n=47) to detect HGD-IC was 6.3%, 100%, and 68%, respectively. A unique subset of IPMNs were identified in all (n=8, p=0.01) cases where pre-surgical EUS-nCLE underestimated dysplasia revealing a distinct micropapillary architecture on post-surgical histopathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite substantial IOA among experienced PB-pathologists, a second pathologist's review may be warranted for dysplasia classification in IPMNs under certain circumstances. Incorporating an imaging biomarker such as EUS-nCLE with Kyoto-HRS improves sensitivity for HGD-IC without sacrificing accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interobserver Agreement in Dysplasia Grading of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Performance of Kyoto Guidelines and Optimization of Endomicroscopy Biomarkers through Pathology Reclassification.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Leupold, Wei Chen, Ashwini K Esnakula, Wendy L Frankel, Stacey Culp, Philip A Hart, Ahmed Abdelbaki, Zarine K Shah, Erica Park, Peter Lee, Mitchell L Ramsey, Samuel Han, Hamza Shah, Jordan Burlen, Georgios I Papachristou, Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate, Mary Dillhoff, Jordan M Cloyd, Timothy M Pawlik, Somashekar G Krishna\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Interobserver agreement (IOA) among pancreaticobiliary (PB) pathologists in evaluating high-grade dysplasia and/or invasive carcinoma (HGD-IC) of IPMNs remains understudied. EUS-guided needle-based confocal endomicroscopy (nCLE) can evaluate papillary architecture in branch-duct (BD)-IPMNs. We assessed IOA among PB pathologists in classifying dysplasia in resected IPMNs and compared the performance of the Kyoto guidelines' high-risk stigmata (HRS) and pre-surgical EUS-nCLE against reclassified pathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects in prospective clinical trials (2015-2023) with resected IPMNs were included. Blinded PB-pathologists independently reviewed histopathology, achieving a consensus diagnosis. The accuracy of cyst fluid next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis, EUS-nCLE, and Kyoto-HRS in predicting HGD-IC was compared with the reclassified pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 64 subjects, 25 (39%) exhibited HGD-IC (17 HGD, 8 IC). Disagreements occurred in 14% of cases with substantial IOA (kappa=0.70; 95%CI: 0.53-0.88) between two PB-pathologists for differentiating HGD-IC vs. low-grade dysplasia. To detect HGD-IC, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Kyoto-HRS and EUS-nCLE were 52%, 95%, 78%, and 68%, 87%, 80%, respectively. Integrating nCLE with Kyoto-HRS improved sensitivity to 80%, with specificity and accuracy at 82% and 81%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of NGS (n=47) to detect HGD-IC was 6.3%, 100%, and 68%, respectively. A unique subset of IPMNs were identified in all (n=8, p=0.01) cases where pre-surgical EUS-nCLE underestimated dysplasia revealing a distinct micropapillary architecture on post-surgical histopathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite substantial IOA among experienced PB-pathologists, a second pathologist's review may be warranted for dysplasia classification in IPMNs under certain circumstances. Incorporating an imaging biomarker such as EUS-nCLE with Kyoto-HRS improves sensitivity for HGD-IC without sacrificing accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interobserver Agreement in Dysplasia Grading of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Performance of Kyoto Guidelines and Optimization of Endomicroscopy Biomarkers through Pathology Reclassification.
Background and aims: Interobserver agreement (IOA) among pancreaticobiliary (PB) pathologists in evaluating high-grade dysplasia and/or invasive carcinoma (HGD-IC) of IPMNs remains understudied. EUS-guided needle-based confocal endomicroscopy (nCLE) can evaluate papillary architecture in branch-duct (BD)-IPMNs. We assessed IOA among PB pathologists in classifying dysplasia in resected IPMNs and compared the performance of the Kyoto guidelines' high-risk stigmata (HRS) and pre-surgical EUS-nCLE against reclassified pathology.
Methods: Subjects in prospective clinical trials (2015-2023) with resected IPMNs were included. Blinded PB-pathologists independently reviewed histopathology, achieving a consensus diagnosis. The accuracy of cyst fluid next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis, EUS-nCLE, and Kyoto-HRS in predicting HGD-IC was compared with the reclassified pathology.
Results: Among 64 subjects, 25 (39%) exhibited HGD-IC (17 HGD, 8 IC). Disagreements occurred in 14% of cases with substantial IOA (kappa=0.70; 95%CI: 0.53-0.88) between two PB-pathologists for differentiating HGD-IC vs. low-grade dysplasia. To detect HGD-IC, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Kyoto-HRS and EUS-nCLE were 52%, 95%, 78%, and 68%, 87%, 80%, respectively. Integrating nCLE with Kyoto-HRS improved sensitivity to 80%, with specificity and accuracy at 82% and 81%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of NGS (n=47) to detect HGD-IC was 6.3%, 100%, and 68%, respectively. A unique subset of IPMNs were identified in all (n=8, p=0.01) cases where pre-surgical EUS-nCLE underestimated dysplasia revealing a distinct micropapillary architecture on post-surgical histopathology.
Conclusions: Despite substantial IOA among experienced PB-pathologists, a second pathologist's review may be warranted for dysplasia classification in IPMNs under certain circumstances. Incorporating an imaging biomarker such as EUS-nCLE with Kyoto-HRS improves sensitivity for HGD-IC without sacrificing accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.