导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤增生异常分级的观察者间一致性:京都指南的执行情况以及通过病理学重新分类优化内窥镜生物标记物。

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.023
Matthew Leupold, Wei Chen, Ashwini K Esnakula, Wendy L Frankel, Stacey Culp, Philip A Hart, Ahmed Abdelbaki, Zarine K Shah, Erica Park, Peter Lee, Mitchell L Ramsey, Samuel Han, Hamza Shah, Jordan Burlen, Georgios I Papachristou, Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate, Mary Dillhoff, Jordan M Cloyd, Timothy M Pawlik, Somashekar G Krishna
{"title":"导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤增生异常分级的观察者间一致性:京都指南的执行情况以及通过病理学重新分类优化内窥镜生物标记物。","authors":"Matthew Leupold, Wei Chen, Ashwini K Esnakula, Wendy L Frankel, Stacey Culp, Philip A Hart, Ahmed Abdelbaki, Zarine K Shah, Erica Park, Peter Lee, Mitchell L Ramsey, Samuel Han, Hamza Shah, Jordan Burlen, Georgios I Papachristou, Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate, Mary Dillhoff, Jordan M Cloyd, Timothy M Pawlik, Somashekar G Krishna","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Interobserver agreement (IOA) among pancreaticobiliary (PB) pathologists in evaluating high-grade dysplasia and/or invasive carcinoma (HGD-IC) of IPMNs remains understudied. EUS-guided needle-based confocal endomicroscopy (nCLE) can evaluate papillary architecture in branch-duct (BD)-IPMNs. We assessed IOA among PB pathologists in classifying dysplasia in resected IPMNs and compared the performance of the Kyoto guidelines' high-risk stigmata (HRS) and pre-surgical EUS-nCLE against reclassified pathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects in prospective clinical trials (2015-2023) with resected IPMNs were included. Blinded PB-pathologists independently reviewed histopathology, achieving a consensus diagnosis. The accuracy of cyst fluid next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis, EUS-nCLE, and Kyoto-HRS in predicting HGD-IC was compared with the reclassified pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 64 subjects, 25 (39%) exhibited HGD-IC (17 HGD, 8 IC). Disagreements occurred in 14% of cases with substantial IOA (kappa=0.70; 95%CI: 0.53-0.88) between two PB-pathologists for differentiating HGD-IC vs. low-grade dysplasia. To detect HGD-IC, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Kyoto-HRS and EUS-nCLE were 52%, 95%, 78%, and 68%, 87%, 80%, respectively. Integrating nCLE with Kyoto-HRS improved sensitivity to 80%, with specificity and accuracy at 82% and 81%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of NGS (n=47) to detect HGD-IC was 6.3%, 100%, and 68%, respectively. A unique subset of IPMNs were identified in all (n=8, p=0.01) cases where pre-surgical EUS-nCLE underestimated dysplasia revealing a distinct micropapillary architecture on post-surgical histopathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite substantial IOA among experienced PB-pathologists, a second pathologist's review may be warranted for dysplasia classification in IPMNs under certain circumstances. Incorporating an imaging biomarker such as EUS-nCLE with Kyoto-HRS improves sensitivity for HGD-IC without sacrificing accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interobserver Agreement in Dysplasia Grading of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Performance of Kyoto Guidelines and Optimization of Endomicroscopy Biomarkers through Pathology Reclassification.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Leupold, Wei Chen, Ashwini K Esnakula, Wendy L Frankel, Stacey Culp, Philip A Hart, Ahmed Abdelbaki, Zarine K Shah, Erica Park, Peter Lee, Mitchell L Ramsey, Samuel Han, Hamza Shah, Jordan Burlen, Georgios I Papachristou, Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate, Mary Dillhoff, Jordan M Cloyd, Timothy M Pawlik, Somashekar G Krishna\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Interobserver agreement (IOA) among pancreaticobiliary (PB) pathologists in evaluating high-grade dysplasia and/or invasive carcinoma (HGD-IC) of IPMNs remains understudied. EUS-guided needle-based confocal endomicroscopy (nCLE) can evaluate papillary architecture in branch-duct (BD)-IPMNs. We assessed IOA among PB pathologists in classifying dysplasia in resected IPMNs and compared the performance of the Kyoto guidelines' high-risk stigmata (HRS) and pre-surgical EUS-nCLE against reclassified pathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects in prospective clinical trials (2015-2023) with resected IPMNs were included. Blinded PB-pathologists independently reviewed histopathology, achieving a consensus diagnosis. The accuracy of cyst fluid next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis, EUS-nCLE, and Kyoto-HRS in predicting HGD-IC was compared with the reclassified pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 64 subjects, 25 (39%) exhibited HGD-IC (17 HGD, 8 IC). Disagreements occurred in 14% of cases with substantial IOA (kappa=0.70; 95%CI: 0.53-0.88) between two PB-pathologists for differentiating HGD-IC vs. low-grade dysplasia. To detect HGD-IC, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Kyoto-HRS and EUS-nCLE were 52%, 95%, 78%, and 68%, 87%, 80%, respectively. Integrating nCLE with Kyoto-HRS improved sensitivity to 80%, with specificity and accuracy at 82% and 81%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of NGS (n=47) to detect HGD-IC was 6.3%, 100%, and 68%, respectively. A unique subset of IPMNs were identified in all (n=8, p=0.01) cases where pre-surgical EUS-nCLE underestimated dysplasia revealing a distinct micropapillary architecture on post-surgical histopathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite substantial IOA among experienced PB-pathologists, a second pathologist's review may be warranted for dysplasia classification in IPMNs under certain circumstances. Incorporating an imaging biomarker such as EUS-nCLE with Kyoto-HRS improves sensitivity for HGD-IC without sacrificing accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:胰胆管病理学家在评估 IPMN 的高级别发育不良和/或浸润性癌(HGD-IC)时的观察者间一致性(IOA)仍未得到充分研究。EUS 引导下的针式共聚焦内镜(nCLE)可评估分支导管(BD)IPMN 的乳头结构。我们评估了PB病理学家在对切除的IPMNs进行发育不良分类时的IOA,并比较了京都指南的高危标志物(HRS)和手术前EUS-nCLE与重新分类病理的表现:纳入前瞻性临床试验(2015-2023 年)中切除 IPMN 的受试者。盲法病理学家独立审查组织病理学,达成共识诊断。将囊液新一代测序(NGS)分析、EUS-nCLE 和 Kyoto-HRS 预测 HGD-IC 的准确性与重新分类的病理结果进行比较:64 名受试者中有 25 人(39%)表现为 HGD-IC(17 例 HGD,8 例 IC)。在区分 HGD-IC 与低度发育不良的过程中,两位 PB 病理学家在 14% 的病例中存在严重的 IOA 分歧(kappa=0.70;95%CI:0.53-0.88)。检测 HGD-IC 时,Kyoto-HRS 和 EUS-nCLE 的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 52%、95%、78% 和 68%、87%、80%。将 nCLE 与 Kyoto-HRS 整合后,敏感性提高到 80%,特异性和准确性分别为 82% 和 81%。NGS(n=47)检测 HGD-IC 的灵敏度、特异性和准确性分别为 6.3%、100% 和 68%。在所有病例(n=8,p=0.01)中都发现了一个独特的 IPMN 子集,在这些病例中,手术前的 EUS-nCLE 低估了发育不良的程度,在手术后的组织病理学检查中发现了明显的微乳头结构:尽管经验丰富的PB病理学家之间存在很大的IOA,但在某些情况下,IPMN的发育不良分类可能需要第二位病理学家的审查。将 EUS-nCLE 等成像生物标记物与 Kyoto-HRS 结合使用,可提高 HGD-IC 的灵敏度,而不会降低准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interobserver Agreement in Dysplasia Grading of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Performance of Kyoto Guidelines and Optimization of Endomicroscopy Biomarkers through Pathology Reclassification.

Background and aims: Interobserver agreement (IOA) among pancreaticobiliary (PB) pathologists in evaluating high-grade dysplasia and/or invasive carcinoma (HGD-IC) of IPMNs remains understudied. EUS-guided needle-based confocal endomicroscopy (nCLE) can evaluate papillary architecture in branch-duct (BD)-IPMNs. We assessed IOA among PB pathologists in classifying dysplasia in resected IPMNs and compared the performance of the Kyoto guidelines' high-risk stigmata (HRS) and pre-surgical EUS-nCLE against reclassified pathology.

Methods: Subjects in prospective clinical trials (2015-2023) with resected IPMNs were included. Blinded PB-pathologists independently reviewed histopathology, achieving a consensus diagnosis. The accuracy of cyst fluid next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis, EUS-nCLE, and Kyoto-HRS in predicting HGD-IC was compared with the reclassified pathology.

Results: Among 64 subjects, 25 (39%) exhibited HGD-IC (17 HGD, 8 IC). Disagreements occurred in 14% of cases with substantial IOA (kappa=0.70; 95%CI: 0.53-0.88) between two PB-pathologists for differentiating HGD-IC vs. low-grade dysplasia. To detect HGD-IC, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Kyoto-HRS and EUS-nCLE were 52%, 95%, 78%, and 68%, 87%, 80%, respectively. Integrating nCLE with Kyoto-HRS improved sensitivity to 80%, with specificity and accuracy at 82% and 81%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of NGS (n=47) to detect HGD-IC was 6.3%, 100%, and 68%, respectively. A unique subset of IPMNs were identified in all (n=8, p=0.01) cases where pre-surgical EUS-nCLE underestimated dysplasia revealing a distinct micropapillary architecture on post-surgical histopathology.

Conclusions: Despite substantial IOA among experienced PB-pathologists, a second pathologist's review may be warranted for dysplasia classification in IPMNs under certain circumstances. Incorporating an imaging biomarker such as EUS-nCLE with Kyoto-HRS improves sensitivity for HGD-IC without sacrificing accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Management of Patients with Colorectal Intramucosal Carcinoma Compared to High-Grade Dysplasia and T1 Colorectal Cancer. Development and validation of the Open-Source Automatic Bowel Preparation Scale. Digital single-operator cholangioscopy for difficult anastomotic biliary strictures in living donor liver transplantation recipients after failure of standard ERCP: SPYPASS-2 study. Identification of risk factors associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with easy cannulation: A prospective multicenter observational study. Interobserver Agreement in Dysplasia Grading of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Performance of Kyoto Guidelines and Optimization of Endomicroscopy Biomarkers through Pathology Reclassification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1