{"title":"从日本 8956 个病例中验证英国胃肠病学会急性下消化道出血指南。","authors":"Ken Kinjo, Tomonori Aoki, Katsumasa Kobayashi, Atsushi Yamauchi, Atsuo Yamada, Jun Omori, Takashi Ikeya, Taiki Aoyama, Naoyuki Tominaga, Yoshinori Sato, Takaaki Kishino, Naoki Ishii, Tsunaki Sawada, Masaki Murata, Akinari Takao, Kazuhiro Mizukami, Shunji Fujimori, Takahiro Uotani, Minoru Fujita, Hiroki Sato, Sho Suzuki, Toshiaki Narasaka, Junnosuke Hayasaka, Tomohiro Funabiki, Yuzuru Kinjo, Akira Mizuki, Shu Kiyotoki, Tatsuya Mikami, Ryosuke Gushima, Hiroyuki Fujii, Yuta Fuyuno, Takuto Hikichi, Yosuke Toya, Kazuyuki Narimatsu, Noriaki Manabe, Koji Nagaike, Tetsu Kinjo, Yorinobu Sumida, Sadahiro Funakoshi, Kiyonori Kobayashi, Tamotsu Matsuhashi, Yuga Komaki, Kazuhiro Watanabe, Takashi Hisabe, Kenshi Yao, Mitsuru Kaise, Naoyoshi Nagata","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>We sought to validate the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 8,956 patients with ALGIB in CODE BLUE-J study and categorized them into four groups based on BSG guidelines. Outcomes included 30-day rebleeding, 30-day mortality, blood transfusion, therapeutic intervention, and severe bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The severe bleeding rates significantly decreased from Group I to IV: 92.1%, 70.1%, 58.7%, and 38.4%. The rate of the need for blood transfusion and 30-day mortality also decreased from I to IV. Although outpatient follow-up was recommended in Group IV, it had high rates of severe bleeding (38%) and 30-day rebleeding (11%). Notably, for colonic diverticular bleeding, the rate of 30-day rebleeding was 25.5%, even with an Oakland score ≤ 8. We identified abdominal pain, diarrhea, and a high white blood cell count as independent factors that differentiate between non-severe and severe bleeding cases in Group IV. Using these factors, the 30-day rebleeding rate in the non-severe group was 3.6%, suggesting the feasibility of outpatient follow-up in this group. Furthermore, a novel, Group X, which deviated from the existing four groups, had a high severe bleeding rate (70.9%) comparable to that of Group II.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BSG guidelines suggest a management approach that can clearly differentiate severity. However, caution is advised when using the Oakland score to triage patients for outpatient follow-up. Additionally, prompt intervention may be necessary for groups not covered by the guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding from 8,956 cases in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Ken Kinjo, Tomonori Aoki, Katsumasa Kobayashi, Atsushi Yamauchi, Atsuo Yamada, Jun Omori, Takashi Ikeya, Taiki Aoyama, Naoyuki Tominaga, Yoshinori Sato, Takaaki Kishino, Naoki Ishii, Tsunaki Sawada, Masaki Murata, Akinari Takao, Kazuhiro Mizukami, Shunji Fujimori, Takahiro Uotani, Minoru Fujita, Hiroki Sato, Sho Suzuki, Toshiaki Narasaka, Junnosuke Hayasaka, Tomohiro Funabiki, Yuzuru Kinjo, Akira Mizuki, Shu Kiyotoki, Tatsuya Mikami, Ryosuke Gushima, Hiroyuki Fujii, Yuta Fuyuno, Takuto Hikichi, Yosuke Toya, Kazuyuki Narimatsu, Noriaki Manabe, Koji Nagaike, Tetsu Kinjo, Yorinobu Sumida, Sadahiro Funakoshi, Kiyonori Kobayashi, Tamotsu Matsuhashi, Yuga Komaki, Kazuhiro Watanabe, Takashi Hisabe, Kenshi Yao, Mitsuru Kaise, Naoyoshi Nagata\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>We sought to validate the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 8,956 patients with ALGIB in CODE BLUE-J study and categorized them into four groups based on BSG guidelines. Outcomes included 30-day rebleeding, 30-day mortality, blood transfusion, therapeutic intervention, and severe bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The severe bleeding rates significantly decreased from Group I to IV: 92.1%, 70.1%, 58.7%, and 38.4%. The rate of the need for blood transfusion and 30-day mortality also decreased from I to IV. Although outpatient follow-up was recommended in Group IV, it had high rates of severe bleeding (38%) and 30-day rebleeding (11%). Notably, for colonic diverticular bleeding, the rate of 30-day rebleeding was 25.5%, even with an Oakland score ≤ 8. We identified abdominal pain, diarrhea, and a high white blood cell count as independent factors that differentiate between non-severe and severe bleeding cases in Group IV. Using these factors, the 30-day rebleeding rate in the non-severe group was 3.6%, suggesting the feasibility of outpatient follow-up in this group. Furthermore, a novel, Group X, which deviated from the existing four groups, had a high severe bleeding rate (70.9%) comparable to that of Group II.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BSG guidelines suggest a management approach that can clearly differentiate severity. However, caution is advised when using the Oakland score to triage patients for outpatient follow-up. Additionally, prompt intervention may be necessary for groups not covered by the guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.020\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:我们试图验证英国胃肠病学会(BSG)关于急性下消化道出血(ALGIB)的指南:我们分析了 CODE BLUE-J 研究中的 8956 名 ALGIB 患者,并根据 BSG 指南将其分为四组。研究结果包括 30 天再出血率、30 天死亡率、输血率、治疗干预率和严重出血率:从第一组到第四组,严重出血率明显下降:分别为 92.1%、70.1%、58.7% 和 38.4%。输血需求率和 30 天死亡率也从 I 组降至 IV 组。虽然第四组建议进行门诊随访,但其严重出血率(38%)和 30 天再出血率(11%)较高。值得注意的是,对于结肠憩室出血,即使奥克兰评分小于 8 分,30 天再出血率也高达 25.5%。我们发现腹痛、腹泻和高白细胞计数是区分第四组非严重和严重出血病例的独立因素。根据这些因素,非严重组的 30 天再出血率为 3.6%,这表明对该组进行门诊随访是可行的。此外,新成立的 X 组不同于现有的四组,其严重出血率(70.9%)与 II 组相当:BSG 指南提出了一种可以明确区分严重程度的管理方法。然而,在使用奥克兰评分对患者进行门诊随访分流时应谨慎。此外,对于指南未涵盖的组别,可能需要及时干预。
Validation of British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding from 8,956 cases in Japan.
Background and aims: We sought to validate the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB).
Methods: We analyzed 8,956 patients with ALGIB in CODE BLUE-J study and categorized them into four groups based on BSG guidelines. Outcomes included 30-day rebleeding, 30-day mortality, blood transfusion, therapeutic intervention, and severe bleeding.
Results: The severe bleeding rates significantly decreased from Group I to IV: 92.1%, 70.1%, 58.7%, and 38.4%. The rate of the need for blood transfusion and 30-day mortality also decreased from I to IV. Although outpatient follow-up was recommended in Group IV, it had high rates of severe bleeding (38%) and 30-day rebleeding (11%). Notably, for colonic diverticular bleeding, the rate of 30-day rebleeding was 25.5%, even with an Oakland score ≤ 8. We identified abdominal pain, diarrhea, and a high white blood cell count as independent factors that differentiate between non-severe and severe bleeding cases in Group IV. Using these factors, the 30-day rebleeding rate in the non-severe group was 3.6%, suggesting the feasibility of outpatient follow-up in this group. Furthermore, a novel, Group X, which deviated from the existing four groups, had a high severe bleeding rate (70.9%) comparable to that of Group II.
Conclusions: The BSG guidelines suggest a management approach that can clearly differentiate severity. However, caution is advised when using the Oakland score to triage patients for outpatient follow-up. Additionally, prompt intervention may be necessary for groups not covered by the guidelines.
期刊介绍:
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.