研究贝利木单抗的安全性,尤其是对儿童的安全性:对美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中真实世界药物警戒数据的分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2430302
Mingming Li, Ziming Zheng, Jie Li, Cong Wang, Ruxu You
{"title":"研究贝利木单抗的安全性,尤其是对儿童的安全性:对美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中真实世界药物警戒数据的分析。","authors":"Mingming Li, Ziming Zheng, Jie Li, Cong Wang, Ruxu You","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2430302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Belimumab was approved in the US in 2019 for children with Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), making it the only medicine that can treat SLE in both adults and children. The authors retrospectively investigated adverse events (AEs) by data-mining a self-reported database.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>PRR, ROR, and BCPNN were used to assess the association between belimumab and AEs. The definition relied on system organ class (SOC) and peferred terms (PT) by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15,316,605 AE reports were retrieved from the FAERS database, and 19,832 AE reports were identified after the data cleaning process. Based on the disproportionality analysis at the PT level, depressive (<i>N</i> = 420), ill-defined disorder (<i>N</i> = 304), injection site hemorrhage (<i>N</i> = 297), lupus nephritis (<i>N</i> = 198), live birth (<i>N</i> = 96) and proteinuria (<i>N</i> = 77) had relatively higher frequencies than other AEs, suggesting that these AEs are more likely to occur in the real world for patients taking belimumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study explores valuable potential AEs of belimumab at the SOC and PT levels, respectively. To provide a reference for decision-making on belimumab, including its use in children, and to promote rational clinical dosing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the safety of belimumab, especially in children: an analysis of real-world pharmacovigilance data from the US FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.\",\"authors\":\"Mingming Li, Ziming Zheng, Jie Li, Cong Wang, Ruxu You\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2430302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Belimumab was approved in the US in 2019 for children with Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), making it the only medicine that can treat SLE in both adults and children. The authors retrospectively investigated adverse events (AEs) by data-mining a self-reported database.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>PRR, ROR, and BCPNN were used to assess the association between belimumab and AEs. The definition relied on system organ class (SOC) and peferred terms (PT) by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15,316,605 AE reports were retrieved from the FAERS database, and 19,832 AE reports were identified after the data cleaning process. Based on the disproportionality analysis at the PT level, depressive (<i>N</i> = 420), ill-defined disorder (<i>N</i> = 304), injection site hemorrhage (<i>N</i> = 297), lupus nephritis (<i>N</i> = 198), live birth (<i>N</i> = 96) and proteinuria (<i>N</i> = 77) had relatively higher frequencies than other AEs, suggesting that these AEs are more likely to occur in the real world for patients taking belimumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study explores valuable potential AEs of belimumab at the SOC and PT levels, respectively. To provide a reference for decision-making on belimumab, including its use in children, and to promote rational clinical dosing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2430302\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2430302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国于2019年批准贝利木单抗用于治疗儿童系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者,使其成为唯一一种可同时治疗成人和儿童SLE的药物。作者通过对自我报告数据库进行数据挖掘,对不良事件(AEs)进行了回顾性调查:采用PRR、ROR和BCPNN评估贝利木单抗与AEs之间的关联。定义依赖于系统器官分类(SOC)和监管活动医学词典(MedDRA)的首选术语(PT):结果:从FAERS数据库中共检索到15,316,605份AE报告,经数据清理后确定了19,832份AE报告。根据PT水平的比例失调分析,抑郁(420例)、定义不清的疾病(304例)、注射部位出血(297例)、狼疮性肾炎(198例)、活产(96例)和蛋白尿(77例)的发生频率相对高于其他AE,表明在现实世界中服用贝利木单抗的患者更有可能发生这些AE:本研究分别从SOC和PT水平探讨了贝利木单抗潜在的有价值的AEs。为包括儿童用药在内的贝利木单抗决策提供参考,促进临床合理用药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the safety of belimumab, especially in children: an analysis of real-world pharmacovigilance data from the US FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.

Background: Belimumab was approved in the US in 2019 for children with Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), making it the only medicine that can treat SLE in both adults and children. The authors retrospectively investigated adverse events (AEs) by data-mining a self-reported database.

Research design and methods: PRR, ROR, and BCPNN were used to assess the association between belimumab and AEs. The definition relied on system organ class (SOC) and peferred terms (PT) by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).

Results: A total of 15,316,605 AE reports were retrieved from the FAERS database, and 19,832 AE reports were identified after the data cleaning process. Based on the disproportionality analysis at the PT level, depressive (N = 420), ill-defined disorder (N = 304), injection site hemorrhage (N = 297), lupus nephritis (N = 198), live birth (N = 96) and proteinuria (N = 77) had relatively higher frequencies than other AEs, suggesting that these AEs are more likely to occur in the real world for patients taking belimumab.

Conclusions: This study explores valuable potential AEs of belimumab at the SOC and PT levels, respectively. To provide a reference for decision-making on belimumab, including its use in children, and to promote rational clinical dosing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Preserving residual kidney function in persons on peritoneal dialysis: the role of pharmacotherapy. Examining the safety of belimumab, especially in children: an analysis of real-world pharmacovigilance data from the US FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database. Safety concerns of aztreonam: a real-world disproportionality analysis based on FDA adverse event reporting system. Pharmacovigilance insights into drug-induced cystitis: analysis of FDA data from 2004 to 2024. Increased reporting of accidental overdose with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a population-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1