Integrating natural commensals and pathogens into preclinical mouse models

Fundamental discoveries in many aspects of mammalian physiology have been made using laboratory mice as research models. These studies have been facilitated by the genetic tractability and inbreeding of such mice, the large set of immunological reagents that are available, and the establishment of environmentally controlled, high-throughput facilities. Such facilities typically include barriers to keep the mouse colonies free of pathogens and the frequent re-derivation of the mice severely limits their commensal flora. Because humans have co-evolved with microorganisms and are exposed to a variety of pathogens, a growing community of researchers posits that preclinical disease research can be improved by studying mice in the context of the microbiota and pathogens that they would encounter in the natural world. Here, we provide a perspective of how these different approaches can be combined and integrated to improve existing mouse models to enhance our understanding of disease mechanisms and develop new therapies for humans. We also propose that the term ‘mice with natural microbiota’ is more appropriate for describing these models than existing terms such as ‘dirty mice’. There is emerging evidence that mice with a history of microbial exposures can better model the human immune system than laboratory mice maintained in pathogen-free conditions. In this Perspective, Rehermann and colleagues summarize different approaches that have been used to incorporate microbiota and pathogen exposures into laboratory mouse models. They suggest that the term ‘mice with natural microbiota’ should be used instead of ‘dirty mice’ to describe these systems in the future.